419
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 79 points 5 months ago

Ah yes, the party of 'keep the government out of my business!' is all for sticking their noses into other people's business. Fucking hypocrites.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Hey now that’s not really fair. They’re also traitors to democracy.

[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 10 points 5 months ago

With business they mean their corporate businesses.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

And rich people's private business.

[-] Nom@lemm.ee 53 points 5 months ago

How the hell do republican women even exist not to mention all the republican women in government. Does none of these affect them or are they always pregnant?

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 35 points 5 months ago

Some are white and wealthy enough that the rules don't apply. Some are in abusive relationships and feel forced to vote a certain way. Some are in traditional marriages where the husband controls everything, especially what's on TV and see nothing but Fox news. Some are older and in social circles that completely avoids politics, so they just vote how husband says to vote. Some are incredibly religious and only vote the way the pastor says, because they truly think God wants that.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 24 points 5 months ago

Abortion is wrong but if I needed one then mine is ethical because I had a good reason. /s

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 months ago

Republican women are no different than Republicans generally: they think the rules are for everyone else.

They aren't going to be affected because they are special. And Christian. After all, God is behind them!

See, if brown and/or poor people would just accept JEBUS into their hearts, they too would know the love that a child would provide! God only hurts sluts. He would never do that to a god fearing woman.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

God is behind all of us. He's just non-consensually railing us day in and day out. I for one don't appreciate that dick.

[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

They must simply lack all critical thinking skills, and be so brainwashed that they really believe God wants it this way...

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

The right wing media machine, coupled with poor education

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Republicans: We need a federal database to track pregnant women!

Republicans: Putting gun owners into a federal database is a violation of personal freedoms!

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Making sense isn't their thing

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago

People are freaking out about the database thing but check out the zinger on the last 3 pages of the 23 page bill.

It looks like this law would allow a woman to accuse any man of being the father of her unborn child, force immediate child support payments while she's pregnant, and the accused man would not be able to question or confirm he is the father with a paternity test.

‘‘(35) provide that the State will establish and13 enforce child support obligations of the biological fa-14 ther of an unborn child (and subsequent to the birth15 of the child) to the mother of such child provided16 that—"

(skipping unrelated sections A-D then comes section E)

"‘(E) any measure to establish the pater-9 nity of a child (born or unborn) shall not be re-10 quired without the consent of the mother; and"

source (PDF of the text of the bill)

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Haha so they never had any intention at all of passing it.

Seriously crazy.

[-] ReiRose@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

This is horrible, thank you for the share.

Patriarchy negatively impacts men and women.

[-] space@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 months ago

Your local politicians should start having a lot of children right now.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 5 months ago

I guess a lot of billionaires will be on the hook for child support if this passes.

[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 5 months ago

They want the health records of trans people as well. They want to make lists of people, so they know who to prosecute when they make being on the lists illegal.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago

I think they have worse things than prosecution in mind for trans people. We are talking about fascists here.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Yes but who will they come for first? I wonder if it will be a similar order to last time.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 5 months ago

It’s a completely normal idea. /s

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago

Small government, not interfering with people's freedoms, just as they always preach.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Remember how much gaslighting the fascist party was doing about this just about 2 years ago?

[-] Dreizehn@kbin.social 15 points 5 months ago

The Government of Putin can shove their agenda up their damn a-hole.

[-] Maiznieks@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

The hell is wrong with republicans, can they stop being dumb for once?

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 5 months ago

You mean evil

And no, they can't stop

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

You’d think this was something new.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

Government Databases are BAD! UNLESS it's a database putting a target on my Daughter's back! That's OK!

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

They want to keep track of those future soldiers!

[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

All you have to do is glance at the crusader pendant around this zealots neck, to know she will kill for "the will of God" who she pretends has personally spoken to her. Any person claiming to know, or act on the "will of God" is a fraud.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

That seems pretty messed up.

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago

Time to add username "Tab Comma Return" to their database.

[-] ParabolicMotion@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, it’s called every pregnant woman’s blood draw sample for testing gestational diabetes. Not to mention all of the other blood draws. Does she believe that DOJ isn’t sent dna off of nearly every blood draw that doctors, and hospitals, make? Considering how many surnames and faces repeat in politics, I bet the feds all keep track of who is breeding so well, that they can predict when the next baby will be born to which family. The only ones they probably can’t forecast, after so many decades of watching families breed in this country, are the migrants that cross the border while pregnant.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I don’t work in the lab but I guarantee where I work, none of our samples go to the government lol

this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
419 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4009 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS