101
submitted 5 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 70 points 5 months ago

... while still opposing estate taxes. It's fucking amazing the lengths Americans will go to to avoid actually solving a problem.

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 34 points 5 months ago

No kidding.

This is like healthcare, which every other nation has mostly solved, but the Americans bend over backwards to find the most byzantine “solutions “ for just to avoid taxing the rich and/or implementing a functioning welfare state.

The latest hysterical example was importing drugs from Canadian pharmacies because apparently buying from a (barely) socialist country is okay, but basic bargaining is somehow immoral.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Don't forget that paying taxes to help others while they don't necessarily benefit from it horrify most of them

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 24 points 5 months ago

Oh yes, let's do another special loophole kinda bullshit thing instead of restraining capitalism, breaking up monopolies and providing for the social good.

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 18 points 5 months ago

Can't wait to read the headlines in 20 years:

"My 401Kids account was hacked and now I start with nothing"

And

"Dad uses 401Kids account used for hookers and blow"

And

"Buy now, save later, 401Kids account available for lay-by purchases "

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Also:

"Need money now? Get a low* interest loan using only your child's 401Kids as collateral! Turn that theoretical money into actual money!"

*And you better not miss a payment, you fucking deadbeat.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I'll start my own 401k. With blackjack, and hookers!

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

“hey, it’s your 18 birthday: hot single women in your area want to help you celebrate. Just send $53,000 to book your cabin on our exclusive birthday extravaganza cruise!”

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

All families would be eligible to contribute up to $2,500 per year.

Most of us don’t have $2500 per year to save !!!!!

[-] scoobford@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

That's good, it means the cap won't restrict what you can save for your children.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee -3 points 5 months ago

You are not required to contribute the maximum. Some of the programs only required $5 for an count. Saving some, even a little, is better than saving nothing.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 5 months ago

But it doesn't do anything about inequality. Rich kids will have an even bigger tax shelter to retire on while poor kids will have nothing. This is a tax break for the wealthy.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago

The income cap for it is pretty low so wealthy people would not be able to put into it.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

But they already don't need it lol

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That's the point the poor kids stay poor and the rich kids stay rich. How does this solve the issue it's trying to fix?

Another way systemic inequality is given an individual solution so America can continue to pretend poor people deserve to be poor.

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 11 points 5 months ago

It starts before birth. Low socio-economic status affects the health of pregnant people, which in turn has consequences for foetal development. Stress is a big trigger for various latent congenital issues, and that's one reason climate change is going to result in increased rates of disease.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is a giant SMH

this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
101 points (98.1% liked)

News

23207 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS