Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant.

I think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogs

Are these elephants in the room right now?

You either are crabs or have crabs

All the other numbers can be written wit 0/1

Does the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.

“Non-binary” only means there are not-two-states.

The state of having two states and the state of not-having-two-states is itself a two-state solution.

Unfortunately, once you rule out non-binary as a third state, you collapse back into the original binary state. Thus, non-binary exists as a quantum superposition between states, as we fluctuate between whether or not being non-binary is politically correct.

I want to upvote the OP for presenting an interesting discussion but downvote them for being wrong. This presents a case for a non-binary voting option.

A singular like button would still only express one portion of my sentiment. A third option could be many things, none are sufficient: a none or 0 or neutral option is effectively not voting, a sideways arrow or maybe state, or mixed state would express indecision or indeterminism rather than mixed feelings.

Therefore, I propose that a second positive-negative axis is required. The addition of these "sideways" arrows allow expressing 2 kinds of sentiment: towards the post content, and towards the poster themselves. I will not specify whether left or right is positive nor will i clarify which axis (x or y) corresponds to which kind of sentiment. I'm sure this undefined behavior will cause no problems.

Here is your composite vote in the new system: ↖️

Can I identify as NaN?

I float!

You'd think so, and yet...

That's so sad to me. From my POV being non-binary isn't aggressive. It's just that there are more important things to worry about than gender.