443
submitted 6 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Last fall, out of public view, the North Carolina Supreme Court squashed disciplinary action against two Republican judges who had admitted that they had violated the state’s judicial code of conduct, according to three sources with direct knowledge of the decisions.

One of the judges had ordered, without legal justification, that a witness be jailed. The other had escalated a courtroom argument with a defendant, which led to a police officer shooting the defendant to death. The Judicial Standards Commission, the arm of the state Supreme Court that investigates judicial misconduct by judges, had recommended that the court publicly reprimand both women. The majority-Republican court gave no public explanation for rejecting the recommendations — indeed, state law mandates that such decisions remain confidential.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] teft@lemmy.world 66 points 6 months ago

The other had escalated a courtroom argument with a defendant, which led to a police officer shooting the defendant to death.

Wait, what happened? That seems like as crazy of a story as this one.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 42 points 6 months ago
[-] scops@reddthat.com 16 points 6 months ago

Your third source also includes a transcript of the conversation which led to the defendant rushing the judge. Very helpful for understanding the story here.

[-] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago

Seriously. He said his defense attorney was inadequate and asked for a different attorney. The judge said you take this one or you decide to represent yourself. And then the defense attorney asked to withdraw.

He never chose to defend himself. He never got the option to continue with his (to his mind) inadequate attorney. They made him defend himself for even questioning if he could get another attorney.

And then instead of explaining or trying to rectify the situation, she just yelled at him and sicced her goons on him.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 6 months ago

Kind of proves his attorney was inadequate though

[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The article seemed intent on hiding the names of the judges but, thankfully, there aren’t many court shootings per year, per state. Could be this’n

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 43 points 6 months ago

One would think secretly squashing disciplinary action that was based on admitted violation of the judicial code would itself be a violation of the judicial code. WTF?!?

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 34 points 6 months ago

It is, but just like Clarence, Alito, etc on SCOTUS. Who holds them accountable for violating ethics or impartiality?

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 17 points 6 months ago

I read somewhere or other that 'no one is above the law', apparently that's a goal to be attained, rather than the current situation.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago

"yeah, that's true, but I'm not no one I'm ALITO! I do what I want!"

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 months ago

Thank you Propublica!

I'm so impressed by their work!

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 months ago

Just little artifacts of fascism setteling into the fabric of American society.

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

And it seems to be always tied to the conservatives / republicans.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 6 months ago

Intake bias

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

If they had let it happen to those two, it could happen to any of them.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

As it should.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 6 months ago

Disgusting behavior by GOP is no longer surprising and that, in and of itself, is deeply troubling.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

North Carolina citizens massively fucked up by sitting out the election for the state supreme Court seat and letting the incumbent Democrat get removed

Hope you do better in a few decades (hopefully sooner if one drops dead or has the fate they deserve)

[-] titus_w_blotter@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I like the article, but are we giving up on the difference between "quash" and "squash" or has that train sailed?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

AI isn't as smart as we are. ;)

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Yay corrupt justice

[-] Veraxus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Wonton and brazen corruption and misconduct by GOP agents at all levels, you say? Must be a day of the week.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

And Repub like to say they're not corrupt.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

And they are probably still judging 🤔. What are we? Retarded sand rock? Not just motionless objects, but practically useless ones?

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

Not "probably". The court literally declined to take any disciplinary action at all.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
443 points (99.1% liked)

News

23669 readers
3570 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS