807
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 169 points 6 months ago

Music to my ear and I wonder how much it costed them to comb through all of that.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 171 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Fun fact, costed is a word but has a slightly different meaning than the way you have used it.

Costed means to get the details on the cost of something complex. Like "I costed the three projects and the last one is cheapest"

You tried to use it as the past tense of cost, but the past tense of cost is also just cost.

[-] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world 93 points 6 months ago

I love free English classes..

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 83 points 6 months ago

Free education? Hell yeah brother!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Chozo@fedia.io 150 points 6 months ago

So not only was it hateful, but it was wasteful, too. Good job, Utah.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] m13@lemmy.world 103 points 6 months ago

People should keep submitting fake reports, and make them somewhat plausible. Just so they don’t get instantly discarded and can actually tie up more resources by actually getting investigated.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 77 points 6 months ago

This is something an LLM is actually very useful for. It can make it sound both legitimate, be verbose and generate many submissions with little human effort.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago

The employment of a large language model, such as the one utilized in this scenario, can prove to be remarkably advantageous. It possesses the remarkable capacity to transform the provided text into multiple submissions that convey an aura of authenticity, while adhering to the principle of verbosity. This approach allows for the generation of a substantial quantity of content with a minimal investment of human resources and effort.


Engaging the services of an advanced language model represents a highly valuable asset in this particular context. Such models exhibit the remarkable ability to reformulate the given input in a manner that not only maintains an air of legitimacy but also embraces the principle of verbosity. This capability enables the effortless generation of numerous unique submissions, thereby optimizing the utilization of human resources.


The utilization of a large-scale language model in this scenario can be deemed a highly effective and efficient approach. These sophisticated systems possess the remarkable aptitude to transform the provided text into multiple submissions that uphold a sense of legitimacy and authenticity, while simultaneously adhering to the principles of verbose and detailed expression. This approach allows for the generation of a substantial volume of content with a minimal investment of human effort and involvement.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 months ago

Thank you for the support, fellow human.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Worth noting, Russia agrees very much and is flooding social media in a very similar way. The LLM makes it more effective now than in 2016

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

But like, how would they even investigate them? That's the part I don't understand. Whoever was peeing in there, they're gone by the time the cops show up. It doesn't take that long to pee.

[-] androogee@midwest.social 49 points 6 months ago

Republicans show up and taste the toilet seat. They claim they can tell the difference.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 months ago

I love/hate how I can't tell anymore if comments like this is sarcasm or real.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] crab@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

Can we submit on a website? I can submit a million per day

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 97 points 6 months ago

only five were investigated

Can one sue Utah for gross neglience now? I mean, they got thousands of complaints from concerned citizens, and they only cared for investigating five of them? Or do they profile those complaints into "we are not investigating certain types of people", e.g. politicians that have been reported?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago

I want to know how they "investigate" this bullshit. This is a complete waste of tax payers money...but since it's from the party of small gov. And saving money its ok cause we have to know who's got what equipment and going into what bathrooms.

All business's should just swap all their signs over to unisex and be done with this bullshit.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

This is a complete waste of tax payers money

A lot of those rulings are. But this would be fun to exploit to the bottom just to make it really hurt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 6 months ago

It's only 5 so far, reading the Bee Movie script takes a long time, especially when they have to keep stopping to sound out every other word.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frezik@midwest.social 18 points 6 months ago

Well, a huge chunk of those probably came from patriotic LGBT+ citizens cramming the reports with junk. Which is a good thing to do, but we wouldn't expect them to do more than a cursory check.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Well, a huge chunk of those probably came from patriotic LGBT+ citizens cramming the reports with junk.

Of course. But they opened that snitchline with so much fanfare and claimed people using the "wrong" bathroom the end of the world. And then they only investigate five out of 12k reports. Now that sounds lame even for Republicans. What if they opened a snitchline on corrupt politicians? Will they only investigate five cases out of 12k reports? Such a snitchline would be much more important for society than reporting people using the wrong door. But chances are that they won't open such a line for a number of reasons...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 75 points 6 months ago

This is outrageous. They're not even going to attempt to investigate my report about an alien beaming into the bathroom and touching my peepee? Just for that, I'm filing 10 more complaints.

[-] Leg@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

On this planet, you don't just leave a guy hanging like that. When you start a job, finish it dammit!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 73 points 6 months ago

I’m struck by the fact that as a trans woman I look more cis than some women I know who’ve given birth. I’m actually worried about a cis friend of mine if we ever get bathroom laws here.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 55 points 6 months ago

I've been trying to explain to my less enlightened family for years that requiring a trans man to use the women's bathroom only makes it easier for men to just walk in since having a beard and a dad bod no longer means you have to use the men's room.

These laws just don't make any sense and can only make whatever they are afraid of (men hearing their wives and daughters tinkle, apparently) worse.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 months ago

That's what has always stumped me. They do realize that trans men look like... men. Right? Like, they want some dude to just stroll into the women's bathroom? Like, legally want that dude to be forced to stroll into that women's bathroom?!?

The dude doesn't want to be in there. Women don't want the dude to be in there. Why do these politicians want the dude to be in there?!

[-] interrobang@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 months ago

and the trans person gets assaulted in the bathroom they are 'supposed' to use! Its just an excuse to banish us from public, there is no right answer.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Exactly. It’s like telling black people to use their water fountain. But there isn’t a fucking water fountain for them.

Regression of society sucks to watch in real time.

Edit: hope this isn’t an offensive correlation. 💀

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've been saying that for a while. Not only does this open up many trans women to additional harassment, it also opens it up to any cis woman someone decides looks too masculine to be a "real" woman.

[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 months ago

Let's cut to the chase.

This bill, and many like it, are created with a clear purpose: to subjugate women. Harming the LGBTQ2+ community is almost secondary, since they can do that just fine already.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] dumples@midwest.social 24 points 6 months ago

Based on that numbers it will be mostly cis woman who get harassed. There have been plenty of cases of it already. There was a few big ones in my state when people complaining that their daughters lost in sport

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Conservatism has only ever been about the most superficial of ideals.

Many of them would have no issue at all with extending laws about gender to laws about appearance and I'm not even kidding. We have plenty of examples from right-wing governments and social trends of the past absolutely leaning into ideas like phrenology or inherent, essential qualities that go alongside things like hair and eye color.

You should be concerned for your friend, everyone should be concerned that if allowed to mature, conservatism in the US would throw us right back into a time when people can face legal penalties for what they choose to wear, for how they express themselves, for the shape of their face and a thousand other ways they would want to police the world around them so it continues to look the way they want it to look. And too bad if you don't look like someone who should live in that world.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

I would definitely let Utah know that you saw a great many of these people use the "wrong" bathroom:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64th_Utah_State_Legislature

[-] homesnatch@lemm.ee 28 points 6 months ago

Only 12000? Those are rookie numbers! Get back to work!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

I suppose decades of misandric conditioning would create the opinion that all men, trans or not, are sexual predators and closet perverts. This needs to change.

[-] androogee@midwest.social 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And misogyny conditions to believe that all women are victims. They really aren't separate forces, they work together.

Eerybody needs feminism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Shou@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

As long as transwomen sit down when using the loo, they are more than welcome. I'm glad that snitch line drew up nothing. Imagine if they used those funds to fascilitate free hygiene products? But noo, they gotta harass a minority...

[-] snapoff@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Why does sitting matter? I’m honestly asking because I remember my twenties and about half my friends (women) would just hover over the toilet seat. We’re all in our 40s now so I can pretty much drop the percentage to 10% hovering based on complaints about knee pain lol

Editing to add: I’m actually too short to have ever hovered over a toilet seat, I’m not advocating hovering, but that’s not even my point. Splashes can happen for any number of reasons. Y’all want to say only those who sit down should use the women’s bathroom and I’m here to tell you women are just as gross as men in their capacity to urinate onto the seat, regardless of plumbing.

[-] Shou@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Hovering is just as bad. Because standing causes small deoplets of urine to splash out of the toilet. Not unlike the mist at the bottom of a waterfall. By cleaning the toilet seat and just sitting down, a stall gets nasty slower.

It's fine if the stall is horrible already, but if it's clean, it's better if we keep it that way.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

As a straight guy, I have just walked into the wrong bathroom or chaises a kid into the wrong bathroom more times than I want to admit.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 6 months ago

Looks like they took the form down. If anyone has a new link, please post it. I've got some creative writing to share with the bigots in Utah.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

I'd rather my Tax Dollars go to THAT instead of feeding Starving American Children!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Preface: I don't care at all what bathroom anyone uses, just a silly lighthearted comment:

But I do find it a bit funny that the headline mentions 12,000 complaints, but leaves out that only 5 of them were even looked into, lol.

Sensationalism is everywhere, I guess, lol.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Censored@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I think we need to start breaking the law and self reporting. We'll send in pictures of our junk spewing urine in the wrong room so they'll be sure it's a legitimate complaint.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
807 points (98.7% liked)

News

23655 readers
3241 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS