You're not wrong, also you must consider it's because of all the people who don't vote. They would have no clue about any of the choices you are talking about because they didn't have to make the choice. Can't forget something you never knew.

I was a super volunteer for both Bernie campaigns and everything that I ever looked at or heard regarding strategy, voting districts, and simple math, all said that the way to win on election is to get just a handful of those non-voters out to the polls, and then our ideas win handedly. I can't remember the figures, but that second time around we had a million people sign up to volunteer and figured that if all of those people could get three traditional non-voters to the polls and vote for Bernie, we would have handedly won the early primaries, which was the priority that we had literally four years to organize and plan for. We didn't realize we would win in Iowa but the media was going to declare former CIA asset Pete Buttegieg the winner anyway.

People have a lot of theories about what what stopped Bernie from winning and most of them are at least partly true, because we were up against everything. I remember feeling like every project or team I worked on or with was continually running into walls, mostly media walls, where our messages got spun and flipped against us. And I remember that last run, coming in hot to the primaries with massive fundraising, in February and March, before the other contenders dropped out and backed Biden, and I don't know wtf Cornell West is up to right now, but at that moment in Bernie's campaign he said something that has stuck with me: "RFK was shot in June."

Man, that's what people who are engaged in the process are up against; most of America has literally no clue about any of this happening. They live their life day to day, a quarter mile at a time, paycheck to paycheck, with zero time for politics, policy, law, and government. The engaged, undecided voter is like a unicorn, I've never seen one, and I'm pretty sure they're only myth. And that's my rant, thanks for sticking around. See you at the dinner buffet.

Well there is a wide range of experiences and perspectives.

For me personally, while theres a bunch of awful stuff going on, its not like those things didnt exist before. We have been dealing with nationalistic terrorism for at the very least since the end of the Vietnamese War.

I hate to sound all silver lining or whatever, but the reason I'm not worried is that over time, in general, it seems the majority slowly moves forward as fast as they can comfortably do so.

Objectively bad things like violent crime, unequal rights, tribalism, religion to an extent, have all declined consistently over my whole life.

And I will add that the republicans who are saying that their way of life is under attack, it absolutely is. I dont know why people expect these groups to just hear a well argued position and just decide to change their mind.

Its very rare for people to change against their local community without a strong driving factor, and a loud democrat is never going to be that.

And for the record, I dont care about Biden's problems right now because even he is changing as fast as possible given his own biases and past experiences, and the fact that the democrats lead as a party leads me to being comfortable with the VP taking over if he dies or goes senile.

In fact I'd much rather a senile Biden to any version of Trump. Ive also yet to hear anyone say that the next election cycle is going to be more of the same since. I hear about optimism for our next possible choices.

I don't think it's credible to say that The pier was built for the Israeli rescue operations.

In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary