But you realize that's not what's in the headline, right?
Like, if you're trying to actually learn I'm down to clarify, but it feels like you just want to argue the line as close to dehumanizing these people as you can...
I always just ate it too.
Way lower sugar, lots of fiber, it's probably the best part of a pineapple for you.
If you're expecting normal pineapple it's going to suck, but if you know what you're getting into they can be good.
Every once and a while I'll give it to the dog if it's too hard. As a bonus pineapple has bromaline naturally, you can buy it as a powdered supplement to put on their food, and for whatever reason it stops making poop taste delicious. They don't notice it the fast time, but the second go around they're not interested.
At one point I had to put it on a kittens food because the dog wouldn't stop raiding the litter box.
Edit:
Obviously look into if dogs should/can eat it first before feeding your dog a pineapple core. I think it's cool but you should never just do something from social media before verifying.
The source doesn’t change the facts
The sky is blue
Faux news could report that as saying when the sun goes away it's because God is punishing us for eating meat on Wednesday after 2:00pm.
The sky is still blue, but all the other shit doesn't magically also come true.
That's why no one will read faux news. Even in the rare case a headline is true, the article will completely misrepresent it.
It's common among all the far right news networks
What's wrong with "people who immigrated illegally"?
People aren't illegal
They can illegally be places they shouldn't, but they're two completely different things and even tho this is likely due to translation it's always good to point out
Thanks for the example!
Whether an individual determines AI "smart" depends on how smart the person is. We're all all our own frame of reference.
I have no doubt AI impresses you every day of your life, even stuff that's not AI apparently, because not all of your examples were.
Another idiot who thinks "prompt engineering" is a real skill and not just another step those companies are using idiots for free AI training.
You ask AI to draw a ninja turtle on a skateboard, and that "effort" they put into phrasing their request well enough for the AI to understand makes the AI learn the 10 past attempts were looking for what the 11th got
And now it won't take ten tries to go that route
Any "skill" by the user has a very short expiration date because the next version won't need it thanks to all the time users spent developing those "skills".
But no one impressed with AI is smart enough to realize that. And since they're the on s training the AI....
Idiots in, idiots out
12/15.5=77%
18/22=84%
Saying that 18 million more registered voters is more I formative than the percent of registered voters has increased 7% is just ridiculous to me
One shows real useful to information, the other doesn't fucking matter.
If you think that's "wrong" then I'm not sure how to explain this in a way you can understand.
But I'm pretty sure youte assuming I'm saying something else
Eh...
In the 1960s it was like 50%, I don't think we're there yet
And people talk about how today's violence, extremism, and division is new like the Civil Rights movement never happened and Malcolm just had that AK for a photo OP.
You're "than ever" isnt accurate.
Point being percent is the metric to use here. Not total number
The headline:
But in case you're honestly trying to learn:
Use an adjective to describe a person. Don't use a noun to label to them.
Christian's are the exception because they "took it back" like over a thousand years ago when they became the majority, it's perfectly fine for them to prefer that. But it doesn't effect any other group.
And it's not just religions, literally every group in every conversation;
Use adjectives.
Not nouns.