1644
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 162 points 5 months ago

We said thoughts and prayers, isn't that their custom for victims of gun violence?

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 104 points 5 months ago

Brilliant. The only issue is conservatives don't make arguments by logic. Using logic against them does nothing. The people who need to see this likely can't even read.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago

I’ve been saying this for years, you can’t do good faith with a bad faith person.

Imo the correct solution is some light trolling, light enough that you still have the moral high ground.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 97 points 5 months ago

you got to love how they turned the tables and are blaming democrats for fostering an environment of violence lol. Is this what a logic lapse looks like?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

And Democrats are gonna buy it and become even more milquetoast.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And further alienate any actual people that might support them. They have to condemn political violence because it was an attack on their class, and their class solidarity overrides any political rivalry. But even my very liberal friend said "dang, it's too bad they missed." Idk what my Christian grandma feels about the shooting but when Trump got covid she did say he deserved it.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Most if not all. Would not put is past Bernie to show up to the next congressional hearing with an MP5K under his jacket and say “just in case.”

Basically I’m saying we need more Bernies

[-] madjo@feddit.nl 25 points 5 months ago

Welcome to the Post-Fact world of the Alt-Right... They don't care that their arguments make no sense, it's about the feeling behind it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ludicolo@lemmy.ml 93 points 5 months ago

The conservative subreddit is losing their mind rn. They say calling Trump a threat to democracy is violent rhetoric.

Grasping at all the straws in the world.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They say calling Trump a threat to democracy is violent rhetoric.

They aren't strictly wrong. When Republicans insisted that Clinton, Obama, and Biden were a threat to democracy, they absolutely intended it as a call to violence.

The hiccup in their reasoning is that the shooter was one of their dudes. The "Trump is a threat to democracy" line isn't just a GOTV message among Dems. Its an ear-splitting dog whistle from the secessionists and white nationalists who see Jared Kushner as a shadowy (((puppet master))) working Trump's strings. This call came from inside the GOP's own house.

Grasping at all the straws in the world.

Not at all. This is pure projection. Republicans shooting at Republicans, while everyone points at the other and shouts "Double Secret Antifa Infiltrator!" They've drunk their own Deep State kool-aid and now they've got the long knives out for one another.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago

They're also upset that the shooter was apparently one of their own and not an evil lefty liberal. Clearly they would have liked that.

[-] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 84 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

“If [Hillary Clinton] gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Mr. Trump said, as the crowd began to boo. He quickly added: “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”

[-] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

He was just joking though. You can tell because he always speaks plainly.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Fucking hell I totally forgot about this shit. Thank you for reminding us.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 34 points 5 months ago

it's been a while since i've heard them whine about BLM burning the entire country down

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I have been stuck swamping in a truck for days with the driver blasting right wing radio. They never stopped whining about BLM, they just pepper it into everything because they no longer feel the need to talk about it on it's own anymore.

When something becomes that ubiquitous it's always there but as a supporting member of the chorus, not the one in the spotlight

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Is Portland still actively on fire? I heard after all the immigrants murdered everyone in Chicago they went north

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

From the first few paragraphs about fascism on Wikipedia

Fascism rejects assertions that violence is inherently negative or pointless, instead viewing imperialism, political violence, and war as means to national rejuvenation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

[-] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Yes but they will gladly act like violence is bad to gain the sympathy of the average person when it's against their own people.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

We don't even really need to check who has been defending or denouncing what if you want to see who's committing violence, there's an even more damning statistic.

Number of People Killed in Deadly Attacks in the Post-9/11 Era, by Ideology

  • Far Right Wing: 134

  • Jihadist: 107

  • Ideological Misogyny/Incel Ideology: 17

  • Black Separatist/Nationalist/Supremacist: 13

  • Far Left Wing: 1

It should also be noted that Jihadist terror attacks have almost as many victims as far right terror attacks because the former are just more efficient, but far right terror attacks are far more common. Check the graph in the article.

The fact that the far right candidate has been under a murder attempt by another far right loon is just the cherry on top.

[-] jupiter_jazz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

Doesn't even count the OKC bombing, which would shoot up those numbers

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

The shooter was a right wing nutjob apparently?

Personally I think that the whole thing was staged

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

I absolutely do not think it's staged and hate conspiracy nonsense in general.

But, I like this conspiracy because it's basically doing to Republicans what they do to all victims of actual tragedies. These monsters called Sandy hook crisis actors...

So yea, all of this was definitely staged and is fake news 😂

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I prefer the theory that he was a radical centrist.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 months ago

My personal suspicion is he was a high school libertarian who then realized it was not what he thought. I called myself a libertarian in high school for a short time before I realized what that group was really about (basically freedom to hate, not freedom to love, unless it's loving children). I now call myself an anarchist.

At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter. He was a kid who lost his life probably doing something he was convinced was important, as so many kids do. Is he better or worse than the kids who were told that people in Iraq were evil and a threat to America?

Trump, and the whole MAGA movement, have done so much to erode trust in our institutions. The fact someone felt the need to put everything on the line for their (likely futile) attempt to stop it sucks. Even in success it likely would have failed. It would have galvanized support for that faction and someone else would have taken up the position. We need something more powerful than a bullet to kill the movement.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] unwaveringegg@endlesstalk.org 5 points 5 months ago

And the same party that cries about stochastic terrorism now doesn't believe it either.

Well done.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
1644 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

5403 readers
527 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS