531
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 249 points 5 months ago

Get ready, if the Project 2025 freaks get their way this kind of shit will happen nationwide as a full ban on pornography across the board. It's just another way the party that claims they "stand for freedom" will turn this country into a puritanical dictatorship one small step at a time

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 138 points 5 months ago

First they came for the kinky porn, but I didn't speak out, because I didn't like kinky porn.

Then they came for hentai, and I didn't speak out, because I don't like hentai.

Then they came for the vanilla porn, but I didn't speak out, because I don't like normal porn.

Then, all that was left was yiff. And the furry porn stayed because AI cannot recognize furry porn, and it appears even on Google and Bing Safe Search.

And hundreds of millions of people started looking at the only porn left.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

All we are going to have left is Al generated porn. Home grown ai porn.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

The Christian Church.....no! One must not teach our kids to d d d d....raw! And burn all books with pictures or photos. Because gad fore-bid they might be porn... Catho-licks.....yeah burn all the evid....books! One of them might contain a photo of a priest and a kid...we mean porn....

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

The elite is trying any way they have to make people have babies, including banning abortion, porn and LGBTQIA+, they know the birth rate it's going down and they need cannon fodder for their wars.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Jokes on them, I was wanking it to the JC Penny catalog long before internet porn and I will do it again. Porn doesn't make less babies guys still want the real thing but we need to jizz for our prostate health.

[-] azl@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 5 months ago

I love that this sounds like a threat and I cannot stop laughing

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

I will masturbate 10 times a day if it pisses of a religious nut job.

[-] lung@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Don't lie to us, you'd do this for free

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago

It’s hilarious that they think banning porn will suddenly lead to women having sex with men and getting pregnant.

It will just lead to millions of really angry men between the ages of 18-75.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

Next up, social credit. Welcome to Republikkkan Amerika.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago

I am thinking the next thing they go after is the 2A. Might sound crazy, but I can see the SCOTUS deciding to enforce the “Well Regulated” part.

Except it will only be registered republicans who can be considered part of the “well regulated”, and they will add some measures in there that if someone is registered to a party affiliation they automatically vote straight ticket and cannot change it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Putting this out there.

If you are educated, in demand or have the financial means to do so GET OUT. Globalization means most jobs can be worked anywhere and those that can't are often in demand.

My uni is struggling with student numbers and I still don't understand why we aren't advertising to every single American high-school. One mass shooting in living memory, mostly understanding culture in regards to LGBT, low religious control, low corruption and great views 15 minutes away.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 5 months ago

Wait. Is the world going to have to deal with a flood of American immigrants now? That's going to be delicious.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

The good thing is that immigration is meant to be selective- we can pick and choose.

I feel like Mexico may need to put up a border wall shortly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I don't want to be overly offensive, but as someone who has watched the US slowly turn to chum over the decades, I'm not in favour of a mass immigration of Americans to other Western countries. How about you just stay at home and fix things. Most western countries don't experience the same sort of weird and dangerous political problems that are now your way of life.

Just copy what others do. Dump guns as a social artifact, tone down the worst aspects of capitalism, perhaps compulsory voting, adopt a fairer taxation system, and strengthen social security. All other western countries do this to a smaller or greater extent and none of us are perfect or have any less problems in other areas.

I'm definitely not saying that other countries are better, we are not. It's just that you definitely have particular problems and if you can't change them, you better just build that wall.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] rimu@piefed.social 12 points 5 months ago

"only one mass shooting recently" 🙃

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In living memory.

I can't guarantee America has had less than 2 in the last 48 hours.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 20 points 5 months ago

Its much like turning their seasonal "cheap labor" into "illegals", once you make it so they cannot report you, then these monsters feel emboldened to exploit them. It also probably doesn't make much difference to a lot of these monsters as they are interested in girls (not women) to young to legally do porn to begin with.

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 13 points 5 months ago

What's even worse is they're doing it to ban anything they label porn, aka anything they label "obscene". Those penalties they list are to imprison their ideological enemies: anyone not straight or "Christian".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 141 points 5 months ago

I remember when there was all kinds of brouhaha about how america would never ever turn into another islamic state or taliban. Seems that has been decidedly forgotten

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 62 points 5 months ago

they hate us because of our freedoms!

remove freedoms = get less hate.

taps on head

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

No this was always intended. It's the same exact people that screamed about Barack Hussein Obama bringing Sharia law. They were always worried that he was going to introduce Islamic religious law before they could introduce Christian religious law. It was never hidden, the statements were literally along the lines of, "This is a Christian country, Sharia law is not right for us."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 119 points 5 months ago
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 80 points 5 months ago

Fuck me I posted it and just got the joke

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 89 points 5 months ago

nice work gizmodo. i see what you did there

[-] traches@sh.itjust.works 80 points 5 months ago

Yes, “It’s us or the porn”, yes this will certainly go well for the republicans, no notes

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 37 points 5 months ago

Just wait until Grindr pulls out of red states. GOP already helped destroy Craigslist, so now the only place they can meet the cute boys will be at GOP conventions and family reunions.

[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago

You're damn right pornhub pulled out.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 38 points 5 months ago

Eventually you'd think the right would run out of toes to shoot off.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

Don't worry, Congress already created a full mirror of the site beforehand so they can still watch it

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

There is a reason VPN providers are doing so well these days

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Just the gay half though

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

You know who else bans porn? The Taliban, Saudi Arabia and other religiously lead hell holes. GOP is our version of religious extremists. These people are deranged.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SauceBossSmokin@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

They'll be fine. They mostly go to Cornhub anyway.

[-] dephyre@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Pull out game strong.❤️

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CPMSP@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago

Did it leave a stain on South Dakota?

[-] LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 5 months ago

Yeah, the same for Kansas is true! We've got to beat those Republican freaks who are desperate to police the freedoms that everyone else enjoys without guilt.

[-] art@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

The party of small government and free speech strike again.

[-] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Yes, it pulled out but did it pull out fast enough?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
531 points (98.4% liked)

News

23655 readers
2654 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS