682
submitted 4 months ago by DxK@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

But RFK (In that leaked phone call) said his plan was to drop put and endorse Trump right before the election.

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

Source? I completely missed that part. I just remember Trump’s bullshit anti-vaccine comments

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 12 points 4 months ago

I don't think RFK ever stated any such intentions, Trump on the other hand did insinuate a possible cabinet position for RFK ^[1]. Knowing Trump though, I assume it was one of his many off-hand lies and not reflecting his intention - or indeed anything connected to actual reality, as is his wont.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Fuck this dude one way or the other

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Ohh no... anyway...

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Can anyone explain what those endorsements are for? Is it literally just people that garner clout for a living saying "Hey I would vote for this one" or do they have actual consequences. If the former, why would anyone care?

[-] Euphorazine@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

People listen to other people's opinions. You don't care about joe rogans opinion, so his endorsement means nothing. Other people do listen to him and will take his endorsement into consideration. "I agree with what Rogan says alot, he's probably more well informed than me, so if he says someone is worth the vote, well then I don't have to think about it myself and can trust him"

It's newsworthy when a public figure throws their endorsement around, you just don't care about the news

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

When Tim Pool endorses your decision, you know it is a bad one.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Tim Poole is the dumbest person with a platform. This is not hyperbole. I didn't forget about anyone else that may be mentioned, Tim is dumber.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Brain worms voting for brain worms

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago
[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Nah some of them are enlightened centrists who buy into his slightly right-leaning all sides schtick.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

:hurr durring intensifies:

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Do me this experiment please 🙏🥺. Go to YouTube and every time you see "Joe Rogan" anything, just go to down vote and unsubscribe...oh wait I meant, not interested.

You will find that you can't remove Joe Rogan from your feed. It's just going to come in the form of another video.

[-] 1D10@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I have not seen anything about Joe Rogan on my Youtube in well over a year. and I am literally on youtube for most of everyday.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I listen to a lot of comedy podcasts on Spotify. Haven't listened to Rogan in years. I literally only tune in if it's a guest I really want to hear and can get over Rogan being there for 2-3 hours. Still, if I put on a podcast before bed and fall asleep to it, so many times it autoplays Rogan after I fall asleep. Like 90+% of the time. I legit think the algorithm pushes him at that hour to pump his numbers up, but hey, maybe I'm being a roganesque conspiracy nut.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Transvestigated in 5, 4, 3, 2...

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 4 months ago

Wow, I was wrong. RFK, Jr can split the MAGA vote! President Harris should give him and Rogan a medal...

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Not a shock.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
682 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19260 readers
1958 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS