314
submitted 4 months ago by xc2215x@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 104 points 4 months ago

The only polls that matter are ones where physical votes are cast. Vote!

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago

For the election itself, yes. But we’re likely to have major issues after the election if most of Trump’s supporters don’t believe he lost, and polls like this are critical for getting them to accept that.

[-] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago

They're not gonna accept it regardless. We wouldn't be in this position if MAGA cared for facts.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There are some who won’t accept it regardless, and some who will be swayed by what they think everyone else is thinking.

Edit: Also, a lot of the decisions will be made by Republican officeholders who may be happy to play along with the die-hard MAGA faction as long as it doesn’t threaten their own re-election chances, but could get cold feet if Harris polls too high in their own states.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

That's an important observation. A big part of the "authoritarian follower" personality is a desire to be "normal", to be like everyone else. If they think everyone just accepts Harris won they may not be happy about it but they'll be more likely to accept it.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

I was hanging out with a group of conservative dudes last night. They are convinced that Trump is going to win and the Democrats are going to refuse to certify the election, which will result in a civil war.

I really hope that Harris beats his ass so badly that her victory is undeniable. Even then, I'm worried they'll see that as further proof that the election was stolen. Having media bubbles is incredibly dangerous to our democracy.

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I just don't understand the projection. Trump is the one that didn't ensure peaceful transition. The first in history. Trump is the one that staged an attempted coup.

I went on a deep dive researching delusions, though, and I suppose calling people out in the throes of one isn't usually fruitful.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

I just don't understand the projection.

I don't get it either, but it is what the P stands for in GOP.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

I thought the P stood for "Potty-mouth".

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago
[-] kofe@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Ooo thank you, I'll edit

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

They'll believe anything that's convenient for them to believe.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe not. The GOP is losing enthusiasm. They'll still vote for Trump, but it takes more than that to be willing to do violence in the man's name.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Are there really people that think "She's doing so well on the polls! I guess I don't need to vote"? I feel like if you're paying any attention to polls, you're the kind of person who's already going to vote. The kind of people you need to reach are ones that don't care about politics.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 97 points 4 months ago

As usual, national polls mean nothing since we don't have national elections.

But let's see where it stands in the states that count, all of these numbers are from before the DNC and Kennedy dropping out, so we'll need a re-run in a week or two. I'm also adding some states people have been talking about.

Arizona: Toss up. Tie, Trump +1 +2
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/

Nevada: Harris +6, +8, +10
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/

New Mexico: Harris +8, +9
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/new-mexico/

Texas: Trump +5, +6
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/texas/

Georgia: Trump +1, +4
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/

Florida: Trump +5, +8
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/florida/

North Carolina: Toss up. Tie, Harris +1
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/north-carolina/

Virginia: Harris +3
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/virginia/

Pennsylvania: Toss up. Harris +1, +2, Trump +1
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/pennsylvania/

Michigan: Harris +6, +7, +8
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/

Wisconsin: Harris +6, +7, +8
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/

Minnesota: Harris +5, +7, +10
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/minnesota/

Huge shifts in Nevada, New Mexico, Michigan and Wisconsin which, under Biden, were a loss to Trump and shortly before the official shift were still barely Trump.

Trump is up in Texas, but only +5 or +6 which is consistent with the +6 win in 2020 and +9 in 2016.

Florida and Georgia are not the toss up states people are making them out to be.

The Muslim Pro-Gaza vote has had 0 impact in Michigan. Still Harris' race to lose there.

Overall, this is the best showing for the Democrats so far this year, let's plot it on the map:

Of the three toss up states, a win in either PA or NC puts Harris over the top. Arizona does not. She's 2 short if she gets AZ but not PA or NC.

Trump needs BOTH PA and NC to hit exactly 270. PA + AZ he's at 265. NC + AZ he's at 262.

This is really the first time in months that the electoral math has been going away from Trump.

[-] citrusface@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago

As a North Carolinian I have to say it feels really bad knowing your state is actually blue, but it's gerrymandered so hard that it's red and that it will likely stay that way. I will do my best to make it blue again.

I'm terrified of Mark Robinson winning the governor race.

[-] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Gerrymandering has nothing to do with the presidential election.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

No - they have other methods of voter supression for that

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

...Which do directly relate to being gerrymandered.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Oh no I mean shitty practices like shutting down polling stations, throwing people off voter rolls, etc.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I'm agreeing with you

[-] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 4 months ago

What a wonderful "democracy". The candidate with +7 is still a maybe to win.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

The State polls change about a week after the national polls. Give them time to catch up.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

High quality post.☝️

Norh Carolina is the state I'll be watching most closely.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

NC and PA should both be closing and reporting at the same time, but PA has a higher population, so should take longer to get the counts.

Actually, by population, PA is the 5th largest state, behind California, Texas, Florida and New York. North Carolina is #9.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_population

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I really like those numbers! Last time I looked at a polling map, it was Trump needing to win just one battleground state. Now it looks like Harris is in that seat.

As a great example of your point, my vote for Harris-Walz will be one of an overwhelming majority in my state. But that majority we contribute doesn’t really count past that 50%. MY state is predictable, just like the popular vote seems to be trending g bluer again, but what happens in Pennsylvania has so much more impact.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yeah, there was a point where Biden needed PA, MI and WI and was behind in all three. Losing any one was enough to lose the election. That was just before he dropped out.

Harris is up in MI and WI and PA is a tossup.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It looks like they don’t even care enough to poll in my state. At 538.com, the last listed survey still puts Biden in the lead by 18-21 points. I wonder if that will change with Harris, LoL

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Quite a few states are just a given they're going to go one way or another so there's no point spending money on polling there.

My state is the same, nothing in a month:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/oregon/

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

We can infer some things from the national poll though - of course this is all fuzzy statistics but they're always saying something like a +5 for dems in the national polling is roughly equal to an electoral victory.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

The problem is if the poll over or under represents California or New York the numbers might not actually mean much.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cignul9@lemmy.world 54 points 4 months ago

The only poll that matters is on Nov 5. Vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 41 points 4 months ago

Let's make it double digits. Maybe he will cry on national camera.

[-] almar_quigley@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

It really needs to be indisputable because otherwise we could get a repeat of w bush having the Supreme Court hand the victory over to him.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

You know they're ready and waiting to do a repeat performance of Bush v Gore. It doesn't even need to be close, just take long enough to finish the count (see: PA being notoriously slow and probably quite important this time) that the Court has time to invent a decision.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 29 points 4 months ago
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago

It’s surprising that Trump still has the support he does.

The guy is too old and he can’t form a coherent sentence.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Make it 10! Make it 15! We don't stop until Harris is sworn in!

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

How much are points worth?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

The headmaster always spoils the result by giving extra points to Gryffondor

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

We play one point per point.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Can Donald Trump count that high?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yes. He has that many fingers. I'll feel better when he as to take his shoes off to count that high.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

He probably needs help tying his shoes when he eventually gets them back on

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure he can see his feet.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Like seeing that 50% five more points and it'll be a rout.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
314 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2110 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS