Whenever you have applications were implementations are plentiful the only real differentiation you can do without creating a different user experience is the technologies used to develop it. The importance of which in people's perspective is several things, mostly supporting technologies they like and want to see grow and possibly being skilled in the underlying technologies to actually contribute back.

Certain technologies are also just hot garbage, I swear to God if I have to install another electron app for some messaging platform I will shit myself.

Actually... I do :/ Even though I have no idea of the programing realm, most of my self-hosted service via docker written in Go tend to be more "reliable", faster, easy to use?

I'm always happy to self-host somthing written in golang. But I do agree, its the new age "I use arch BTW" meme for programing language !

Some user see Rust or Go as safer Languages. That's all. Also, I don't have anything else to add in Title xD.

When I use open source software, I'll usually attempt to fix any small bugs I run into. I prefer to use an app made in a language I'm more familiar with to make this easier.

It's a sign of modern approach to solve a problem. Languages like Go and Rust have by definition and by principle less memory and security issues (not talking about other problems), which is otherwise a huge problem in C in example. So it's good to know the language being used.

The language itself can play a huge role for non programmers as well. In example Python can be a pain to use in some environments or it can get slow (although for something like RSS reader speed would be fine). For people using software from source in example, to compile themselves can have an impact too. It gets even more interesting for people who might want to look at the code itself, audit or edit it. In example if a program is written in Python, I know that I can read and make changes to it. In C, I would not be that confident.

Overall for most people it does not matter. That's true. For people like you, you can just ignore it. Not every title is for you. The title is for those who care about the language.

Yup. That alone is enough for me to just ignore a software and keep moving.

While I agree that there are not enough good local RSS readers, I also think that some kind of state syncing should exist. I understand why all these hosted server side RSS readers exist, but what I really want is some kind of standard way of doing local first RSS (and not just RSS, this could apply to everything we use «as a service», but let's keep this about RSS for now).

Imagine an RSS reader that keeps its state in a standard, well documented way, like having a folder where plaintext files keep a list of subscriptions, list of articles that are marked as read, tagged and starred articles etc., and you could just use syncthing or git to keep this folder in sync on all your devices, and you could use any RSS reader you want (be it on an android, windows, linux or anything else that follows the standard) and be able to seamlessly read your feeds and have the same state everywhere.

A man can dream I guess…

Every single open source and linux related blog has an RSS feed. A reader groups all those in a single "inbox", I save / share what I find interesting. It's an awesome way to condense news.

Despite not being easy to find, most news sites still have RSS feeds. They are great for just getting the news from sources I trust instead of big tech algorithm recommend blogspam. It is also possible to get RSS feeds from subreddits and Mastodon.

Use it to get info on new torrents mostly movies and games. And I hate reading gaming articles in a browser so rss is the only best experience for me.