71
submitted 1 month ago by Blxter@lemmy.zip to c/steam@lemmy.ml
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] finickydesert@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago

Why would anyone ddos steam?

[-] atro_city@fedia.io -4 points 1 month ago

Microsoft unhappy about competition and trying to tank during a new release?

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

What happened with this game? What is the controversy surrounding it?

[-] Kaijobu@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 1 month ago

They forced unusual guidelines in the second half to influencers and streamers who have received a key from them.

https://videogames.si.com/news/black-myth-wukong-streamers-feminist-propaganda

Very interesting do's and dont's.

[-] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

Are those themes actually present in game, or is this another "please don't hurt our feelings" from China?

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 month ago
[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

ok, umm... so, i'm a little confused. since none of the verboten themes are actually present in the game, why is the game launch being DDoSed? i'm guessing that online backlash to the restrictions has been... typical, but if the restrictions don't really connect to any actual game content, what gives?

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

The restrictions are on people who are playing the game(and showing it off prior to release).

The restrictions are showing that the company selling the game is kinda shitty.

We cannot say for certain but it’s possible that someone(s) in the first group, the customers, is trying to disrupt the sales for a game from a shitty company.

The people who care about and released the restrictions and the people who would be affected by the attack are the same people. The attack isn’t about in-game themes because if it was they simply wouldn’t launch the game.

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The devs may not be shitty, they just have to protect themselves from their government.

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

To add some context to the other replies you’ve gotten, the restrictions were on streamers and reviewers who would be playing the game, not sure if it was an agreement for prerelease access or not though.

I also don’t know if the DDoS was related, but I think the issue was a Chinese developer trying to force non-Chinese streamers to avoid talking about topics embarrassing to or prohibited by the Chinese government.

The restrictions might not connect to any actual game content, but by even bringing it up the developers created the connection.

What gives is right, but for the developers. They managed to Streisand effect their shit, but over something that didn’t even exist in the game in the first place.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

aha, ok, thanks for the cliff's notes version ;)

[-] Kaijobu@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

I don't know if this has anything to do with the ddos. It's just the controversy I came across before the release. It might be connected, but it also might not.

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The CCP has been doing a pretty big cultural push the past few years. You will see more of it's as time goes on.

Nothing wrong with China and their culture, it is their vile government that is the issue. They were doing so well until Xi Xinpoohbear took over.

[-] bizzle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

CCP has been fucked up and backwards since it's inception.

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Which is so shicking after such a great leap forward. /s

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Really? I'm pretty sure they never allowed owning another human beings unlike some other counties.

[-] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

This is weird.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Why would streamers give a shit about game publisher guidelines?

[-] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Not following the guidelines has potential to damage relationships between them and the publisher. Affection existing and future access to pre release content / review content / sponsorship deals etc... . It potentially could damage relationships between others publishers as well.

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

It was guidlines for the prerelease and free copies, if you buy it yourself you do not need to follow the guidelines.

[-] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Are these really strange restrictions though? Don't be an asshole, don't be an asshole, don't distract from the product that you're reviewing with other crap, don't use their product as a platform for politics.

[-] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

Big game media journalism site claimed the devs were sexist because of a poorly translated tweet. Devs ignored this drama and instead focused on promoting their game. Game media journalists got mad they were being ignored and continued to pump articles bashing the game for months before it's release. Game releases, it's good and people like it. Devs continue to ignore controversies and focus on marketing and promoting their game.

Idk how any of that ties into the DDOS if at all, but that's the main controversy I've seen for the past couple months.

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Rare game dev W

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
71 points (89.0% liked)

Steam

10117 readers
1 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS