428
submitted 3 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Susan Horton had been a stay-at-home mom for almost 20 years, and now—pregnant with her fifth child—she felt a hard-won confidence in herself as a mother.

Then she ate a salad from Costco.

Horton didn’t realize that she would be drug-tested before her child’s birth. Or that the poppy seeds in her salad could trigger a positive result on a urine drug screen, the quick test that hospitals often use to check pregnant patients for illicit drugs. Many common foods and medications—from antacids to blood pressure and cold medicines—can prompt erroneous results.

If Horton had been tested under different circumstances—for example, if she was a government employee and required to be tested as part of her job—she would have been entitled to a more advanced test and to a review from a specially trained doctor to confirm the initial result.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 158 points 3 months ago

And let me guess, she paid for the privilege of being forced to stay 5 days and having her baby taken away from her? Unless she’s got amazing insurance?

Honestly, I’m so glad to live somewhere with public health care.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 37 points 3 months ago

Yes. However, she will get a payout in the end

She will, but many MANY more won't be so privileged.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 months ago

Tbf I don't think she wants a payout ... she just wants her kid back (and maybe have the testing protocols updated to follow the science instead of the stupidity).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 135 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 90 points 3 months ago

There was even a Mythbuster episode where they confirmed it. IIRC, their test popped reliably after two bagels.

[-] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

Yeah it was a good episode. They were blown away.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 months ago

I remember myth busters testing this

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 130 points 3 months ago

A lot of this article is about drug testing, but this also should remind people how much chaos one shitty, or overworked, nurse can cause.

[-] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 69 points 3 months ago

Omg yes! I perform drug testing and I've had instances where nurses called CPS before we could give them a confirmation result causing mayhem for all involved. It makes me want to scream whenever I see screening tests used as evidence against people. Any hospital or government agency making those kinds of decisions based on a screen should be sued to high hell. Also fun fact really high levels of Benadryl will cause you to pop positive for PCP on most drug screens. I've had to talk a handful of pediatricians down about that over the years too.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

I had a fun event a year ago where I woke up in a Covid ward after surgery because a nurse saw antibodies on a pre-surgery Covid test.

I had covid about a month before, that’s why I still had detectable antibodies. The doctors all knew that. That’s why they admitted me and performed the procedure.

You should have to clear something past an actual doctor if some things are going to get escalated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com 60 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm sorry but anyone who thinks people with thc in their urine are less valuable than people that don't, is a worthless piece of human trash themselves. It's appalling that this is even a thing but more so how many people actually support it staying the way it is.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I was listening to a podcast today or yesterday talking about huge recruiting shortfalls in 3 of 4 military branches in the US. The biggest factor was that the available pool of recruits are 75% ineligible for a variety of reasons, but the biggest factor is past/current drug use. The most common drug: cannabis. Even if someone has used it only once, even if they just tried it, they are ineligible for military service.

It seems pretty foolish, in the biggest recruitment shortfall in American history, to discount your largest possible pool of recruits just because they might’ve smoked a doobie once.

[-] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Even if someone has used it only once, even if they just tried it, they are ineligible for military service.

Well that's just false. You'll get denied if you pop hot on a drug test at MEPS, but they don't tend to care if you've smoked in the past, except as a barometer for if you'll smoke in the future. And, like almost everything else in the DoD, there's a waiver form you can fill out for it too

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Can confirm. I signed said waiver. I told them that yeah, I smoke weed, but if my job requires me to be clean, I'm clean. Except Adderall. They gave me 30 days to get clean, sent me to MEPS and made me a Nuke. Then nuke school wouldn't let me leave and they made me an officer and an instructor.

I joined the Navy to see the world, ffs. I'd already seen South Carolina :/

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Lmao I'm picturing a series of comedic events like guy enlists to quietly do his service and sail the world, but keeps getting promoted and sent to the most boring places.

"Congrats Chief, were sending you to West Virginia"

"Congrats LT, we're sending you to South Carolina"

"Congrats Commander, we're transferring you to... Montana"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I hope every employer that continues enforcing thc testing in the workplace collaspes. Many of them are already on the brink. I just want to have a normal life and still get to smoke weed sometimes. All I know is that I will continue working towards that goal until I succeed, deal with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago

Hack writing but yeah, this is possible and I'm surprised there isn't a better test.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 months ago

I think there is a better test. The cheap and fast one is tricked though. The fact they didn't do a more advanced test before taking her child is pretty fucked.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

This is a long, long article, but it's 100% worth it. The entire thing is infuriating.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 24 points 3 months ago

Agreed.

It sucks for everyone involved too. The mothers, the doctors, the hospital, the caseworkers, all seem to be locked into a ridiculous position because of poor testing equipment, and overly protective laws.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

So what happened?? There's no conclusion after her kid was taken

[-] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 3 months ago

I heard her talking about it on NPR earlier today. She did get her kid back, but it was a whole fucking ordeal she and her family should have never had to go through in the first place (and thank god she had the resources to fight it)

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 18 points 3 months ago

Also lovely way to start a childs life. Instead of being at the chest of its mother, it gets to be with some overworked strangers, not getting breat fed and not feeling the physical closeness necessary to build a healthy sense of security.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

For decades, state and federal laws have required hospitals across the country to identify newborns affected by drugs in the womb and to refer such cases to child protective services for possible investigation. To comply, hospitals often use urine drug screens that are inexpensive (as little as $10 per test), simple to administer (the patient pees in a cup), and provide results within minutes.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 months ago

If Horton had been tested under different circumstances—for example, if she was a government employee and required to be tested as part of her job—she would have been entitled to a more advanced test and to a review from a specially trained doctor to confirm the initial result.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
428 points (96.1% liked)

News

23655 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS