88
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kvasir476@lemmy.world 122 points 3 weeks ago

Almost like the goal isn't taking out Hamas leadership. Hmmm...

[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago

Nor do they want to rescue the hostages. It’s all an excuse to carry out death. In Gaza and the West Bank.

[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 97 points 3 weeks ago

Israel loves Hamas. Let's them justify their persecution of the Palestinians and the ongoing genocide. They don't want to end Hamas until after they end the Palestinians. That way they get more land to colonize.

[-] Naich@lemmings.world 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Israel helped with Hamas funding for a while. They have always been useful to Israel.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/

Edited for clarity.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] aasatru@kbin.earth 5 points 3 weeks ago

Not all all of Israel loves Hamas, obviously. There are huge protests against the genocide in Israel by people who very much see things clearly.

Netanyahu and his fascist crooks love Hamas.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 81 points 3 weeks ago

Because it's a genocide. The point isn't to just take out Hamas and say "mission accomplished", it's to take out the entirety of Palestine and say "we tried our best to save them". Hamas has to continue existing in order for Israel to keep justifying every extension to this war.

[-] crashfrog@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

But then why commit any ground troops at all?

If they just wanted to wipe out Gaza they’d have done it on Oct 8th. Could hardly take more than an hour.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago

If I had to guess, I'd say funding and plausible deniability are the big reasons. The longer the war wages on, the longer the US and other allies keep sending them money and weapons. And killing them off slowly makes it easier to argue to the ICC that you weren't trying to commit genocide, it just kinda happened as an oh-so-unfortunate side-effect of defending themselves.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 53 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Because Israel's goal is the kill all Palestinians. According to the 3000 year old fairy tales they believe in, anyone who is not an Israelite must be killed driven off from their promised land.

Israel is a religious theocracy run by crazy genodical maniacs.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Currently it is very heavily run by the genocidal religious nuts. Netanyahu needs them to stay in power, which is the part that he cares about. The only part he cares about probably, though I doubt he cares about Palestinians or even believes that they're human. Like most religions, their divided opinions. But since the nutjobs have the keys right now, Netanyahu will do absolutely everything they demand if it keeps him from being ousted (and likely arrested).

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

the genocide did not start with netanyahu. take this example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deir_Yassin_massacre

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago

The goal is not to eliminate Hamas. The goal is to depopulate Gaza.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 18 points 3 weeks ago

Look at what they do, no need to listen to what they say.

Israel is a bad faith actor.

[-] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 3 weeks ago

The goal is not to destroy Hamas. This is a ridiculous excuse. Their true objective is to remove all the Palestinians from their homes, so they can occupy the land. Israel is a fascist, imperialist actor that tries to manipulate everyone through propaganda distributed through international media.

[-] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 3 weeks ago

Because the genocide is the goal.

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago

Because the genocide is the point.

Israeli leadership have admitted to funding Hamas' displacement of the secular moderates with predictable results - the only credible explanation for this is that it was to manufacture the pretext for their current actions.

#justautocraticfascistethnostatethings

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

Wrong question and framing.

Israel's goal is not to get rid of Hamas or their leadership.

Their real goal has been to continue the genocide of the Palestinian people so as to take 100% control of the Palestinian land and to kickout the natives.

[-] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The intention is to "liquidate" Gaza like the Wermacht liquidated the Warsaw ghetto in 1943. It is an annihilation. Hamas and the hostages are just the excuse.

Zionists did the same thing to the rest of Palestine in the Nakba of 1948. Israelis now call this the Gaza Nakba.

[-] CerealKiller01@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

Err... did I misunderstood the question, or do (nearly?) all commenters have no idea what they're talking about?

You're asking why Israel doesn't assassinate Hamas's top leaders, right? Or did I misunderstood and you asking Israel doesn't ONLY assassinate Hamas's top leaders? Or are you asking why Israel responded differently to Munich?

To answer the first question, well... they are. Hamas's top leaders according to BBC are:

  • Ismail Haniyeh - Killed.
  • Mohammed Deif - Probably killed.
  • Marwan Issa - Killed.
  • Mahmoud Zahar - Alive. is 79 years old and might not be active/influential in the leadership.
  • Khaled Meshaal - Alive.
  • Yahya Sinwar - Alive.

Also, keep in mind that the response to the Munich massacre took about 2 decades.

As to why Israel dosen't ONLY assassinate Hamas's leadership, the simple answer is that it won't solve anything. It won't bring the hostages home (It will probably have opposite effect as a. it will leave Israel without a centralized entity with whom to negotiate and b. Sinwar might be using hostages as human shields, which also might explain why he's still alive), and it will still leave Israel with a terrorist entity next door. The official Israeli version is that the assassinations, among other things, serve as leverage on Hamas leaders to secure a deal. Obviously, this is only effective if there is some leadership left.

If you're asking why Israel responded differently to Munich, it's because the situation is totally different in numerous ways. But the question itself is also factually wrong - Israel didn't only assassinate the leaders of Black September. Firstly, the goal was to "assassinate individuals they accused of being involved in the 1972 Munich massacre", not just the leaders. Not only that, Israel also responded with raids and bombings (for example: 1973 Israeli raid in Lebanon).

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Even according to Netanyahu's own statements, the Israeli war aims are the complete destruction of hamas. That's more than leaders. Before this began, estimates put the al-Qassam Brigades at 30-40k strong. So if we take Netanyahu at his word (which I don't recommend) then that would be the minimum for killed/captured before he could declare victory.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 weeks ago

The "war" in Gaza isn't meant to take out Hamas. It's meant to eradicate the Palestinian people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think this one has a clear cut answer.

In other words, it'll come down to opinions rather than facts or truths.

There's at least three likely possibilities, in my opinion.

First is that hamas is decentralized well enough that taking out leadership only is kinda pointless.

Second, the goals of the current actions aren't solely about hamas, and taking out leaders would weaken the goals as they appear.

Third, mossad may not be able to achieve the goal, and failing would be too risky considering how much pressure is already building against israel. If they try to assassinate people in other countries, and they fail, that's going to make more enemies than they already have, despite those countries themselves already being less than friendly to Israel.

I suspect that the matter was considered, but discarded quickly. It just wouldn't achieve anything useful for them, despite the purported goal of destroying hamas.

Now, there's also the chances that the real goal is purely to destroy Palestine, and take full ownership of the land. That's a distinct possibility, imo. If that's the real underlying goal, doing anything to take down hamas before that's achieved would not happen.

I don't think that anyone can trust what a world leader engaged in a military action of any kind, so taking the stated goals as truth is a bad idea. But they could be, and if that's the case, then using assassination as a tool would weaken their position. It's kinda frowned on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

There’s some valuable real estate in those hills.

[-] Furball@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

A ton of the Hamas leadership have been assassinated since the war began, there’s always replacements though

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

Because most of the Hamas leadership isn't in gaza. They're protected in other countries that are funding and arming Hamas.

[-] Don_Dickle@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Yea but that didn't stop Mossad from assassinating the people who were responsible for Munich all over the globe.

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

My guess is that assassination isn't as easy as it is made out to be in the movies. The CIA, the best funded intelligence agency in the world, tried to take out Castro hundreds of times and failed. They couldn't find Osama for a decade, either, and even then the US used Seals, not the CIA. Sure, killing some rando is probably easy, but not a government leader who is actively avoiding assassination, as I'm sure Hamas leaders are doing.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
88 points (87.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35473 readers
914 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS