602
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

Surprised pikachu face

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 237 points 3 months ago

So what exactly is open about their ai

[-] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 283 points 3 months ago

It’s called OpenAI because they are open to stealing content to train their AI

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

You made this?

...I made this!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Can't argue with objective truth

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago

Open(your fucking wallet)AI

[-] Jocker@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago

It's criminal they're keeping the name OpenAI

[-] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago

They put open in their name to get good talent, investments and so people would have a soft spot for them when they collect tons of data to build their product.

Their internal chats that were released in musk lawsuit reveals they knew they were gonna switch to for profit model (they here means the top brass). But they still lied to everybody about their intentions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 154 points 3 months ago

reminder, there are localy ran LLMs. Right now is a vital time for open source to fight against closed source in the AI arms race.

https://www.nomic.ai/gpt4all

[-] mayo@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

Another good resource to help people find models https://llm.extractum.io

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago
[-] utopiah@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I like Ollama, and recommend it to tinker, but I admit this "LLM Explorer" is quite neat thanks to sections like "LLMs Fit 16GB VRAM"

Ollama just works but it doesn't help to pick which model best fits your needs.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] bzarb8ni@lemm.ee 117 points 3 months ago

Almost like Sam Altman is just another run of the mill tech bro scam guy.

[-] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 months ago

I don't think he is a "tech bro scam guy", i think he is worse like he is smart and has a documented track record of lying. Unlike other tech bros, he actually knows the capability /limits of his products and he still lies and makes it out to be something it's not.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 106 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I hope OpenAI is going to serve as a radicalizing example to all the engineers, who fell for the "ethical guy/company" rhetoric, that the minority-controlled corporate structures they're used to cannot withstand the push for profit. I hope this will make more of them choose majority-controlled structures for their startups and demand unions in existing corpos.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 51 points 3 months ago

I mean, I was already radicalized in that respect, but it’s definitely reaffirming that radicalization.

But also: I fuckin told you so. This progression was so blindingly obvious from the get-go.

[-] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 months ago

OpenAI on that enshittification speedrun any% no-glitch!

Honestly though, they're skipping right past the "be good to users to get them to lock in" step. They can't even use the platform capitalism playbook because it costs too much to run AI platforms. Shit is egregiously expensive and doesn't deliver sufficient return to justify the cost. At this point I'm ~80% certain that AI is going to be a dead tech fad by the end of this decade because the economics just don't work now that the free money era has ended.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 10 points 3 months ago

It will fall through much faster than that. I'm thinking two years, tops.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jordan117@lemmy.world 75 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The fact that Silicon Valley interests effortlessly shrugged off the non-profit board's attempt to hit the kill switch last year, and now are preparing to take the company commercial despite the deliberate design otherwise, becomes much more interesting when you consider the theory that corporations are a form of artificial superintelligence.

If the AI idealists can't stand up to basic forces of capitalism, how do they expect to control an actually dangerous AGI?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

You give them far too much credit to assume this specific company will ever achieve anything even close to AGI.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

If the AI idealists can't stand up to basic forces of capitalism, how do they expect to control an actually dangerous AGI?

My guess is they don't expect to. I guess that that is one of the reasons they seem to not care about out of control climate change; burn it all down before it all literally burns down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 71 points 3 months ago

Hey, remember when you guys lined up to suck his dick when the board tried to keep OpenAI working for the good of humanity instead of the oligarchy?

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 3 months ago

I hate being right

Why do people keep being fooled by rich assholes

[-] s3p5r@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago

People have grown up reading comic books and watching movies about generous billionaire superhero saviors. They want to believe that exists because it's what they've been taught justice looks like.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 30 points 3 months ago

Yeah, that was a strange moment. Those in the company being for Altman, I can understand. They expected big returns of investment from keeping him around. But the outsiders on the internet cheering him on? Felt like Elon Musk in the beginning again. And yes I also fell for his engineer persona in the beginning. But I learned from that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 61 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Probably has to be renamed to "ClosedAI" then.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

... To the surprise of absolutely nobody

Actually I have a question and I admit knowing nothing of the legal framework here but...

Isn't it absolutely ridiculous that a not-for-profit entity can exists solely for the purpose of developing a closed-source piece of software, demand to train it for free off copyrighted material, just to switch to a for-profit entity??

Sound 100% like tax avoidance. Like me registering a charity so I can throw a mega concert/party privately, secure preferencial treatment on supplies, get discounts on artists or even free performance and then switch to for profit as I start selling tickets

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Originally all their work was supposed to be published and shared with the world, hence the "open" in OpenAI. However somewhere along the way they made a for-profit break off of the original company and started pulling everything in that direction.

[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago

Step 1. Make an AI that hoovers up content.

Step 2. When owners of content complain about privacy violations and copyright infringement, allay their fears. This AI is for the Good of Humanity.

Step 3. ???

Step 4. Profit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

OpenAI: It's not fair to charge us to use copywriten works.

Also OpenAI: Also you have to pay us for using them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 56 points 3 months ago
[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

How exactly does one “outgrow” “AGI for the benefit of all humanity?

OpenAI Charter https://openai.com/charter

Our primary fiduciary duty is to humanity. We anticipate needing to marshal substantial resources to fulfill our mission, but will always diligently act to minimize conflicts of interest among our employees and stakeholders that could compromise broad benefit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

As Ed said, Sam Altman has been a plague.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 34 points 3 months ago
[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] socialmedia@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Just want to point out that it absolutely is possible to train an AI that will keep track of its sources for inspiration and can attribute those when it makes a response.

Meaning creators could be compensated for their parts of AI generated stuff, if anyone wanted to.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] emmy67@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Wild for a company that's never made a profit

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Surely they will be sued into oblivion if they tried right? Them being non profit was the main pillar holding up their defense for scraping the web into datasets.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

How is this going to work while OpenAI currently burns through an absolute ocean of cash to keep improving its services? Alongside this, a good software engineer or applied scientist can make close to $1m a year. While I do think professionals should earn what their value is to an employer, OpenAI still loses a ton of money.

As someone that works in AI, I think most of us know it's full of people trying to make a quick buck while investors will stupidly throw money at it. OpenAI is ultimately the figurehead of this market though, because at least the big companies can prop their AI offerings with the money they make from shopping, cloud, ads, etc. The second OpenAI looks weak and needs money, the vultures will slice off a piece and we'll see the AI market reduce to a wimper - just enough for tech to focus on the next grift.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

........ They weren't before?

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

Yeah, they weren't as synergized. Now they're coordinating with key stakeholders to maximize the efficiency of their aggressive roadmap. Or something, I kinda suck at business jargon.

[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

This is what Ilya saw...

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 12 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] itsathursday@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Much open, very organic, very demure, so mindful.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Them investors got to get paid!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
602 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
2620 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS