134
submitted 3 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 31 points 3 months ago

Option to allow browser extensions to run only on specific websites

This actually sounds pretty awesome. Now I want that feature. Good job Mozilla, now I want a feature which I may not get soon enough. ^^ Sometimes I wish to be an ignorant.

[-] mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 months ago

Just noting: If one develops a firefox extension one can already restrict it via URL. That should be the first application one develops within the official tutorials.

You could even change this as a non-programmer as long as sources of the software are available.

[-] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 7 points 3 months ago

At the expense of having to either hope devs do it or only use extensions that give the source, having to do it for every extension individually, having to redo it every time you want to add or remove a URL, no longer getting automatic updates, and having to redo it every time you want to update.

I get the sentiment but it's not worth the hassle, especially when it would be trivial to have this as a browser feature that would solve all of those problems.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago

Would be a great feature for online school websites...

Though that also depends on them not using Honorlock (or Honorlock adding firefox support...)

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 17 points 3 months ago

Funny how people were interpreting the survey itself as a way to pretend that everybody wanted AI even when they didn't - yet somehow it was possible that it didn't end up in the top 10 😅

(Also understandably, this won't be 1:1 the roadmap, for the caveats they mentioned in the post. Still helpful!)

[-] MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org 8 points 3 months ago

Amazing, it's almost as if most of us aren't techdudebros with our heads up our own asses :)

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago

Who'd have thought!

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago

Because people don't understand statistics. The survey was very well made.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Agreed, the survey was pretty decent. My biggest complaint, however, was that there wasn't an option for "don't want," only "want least." Sometimes I got three options that I actually do want, and sometimes I got two that I definitely don't want, and I think it would be useful to communicate that.

[-] firewood010@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

How do you weigh a Don't Want with Want Most? A 0.1 weighting is much more useful than a negative weighting. And it is rightfully phrased so.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I would weigh a don't want the same as want least. I just had a couple situations where two options were both "don't want," and I wish I could have communicated that instead of picking one to be in the middle. I don't think the same should be true of "want most" though, I should be forced to rank those. But for two things I really don't care about, ordering doesn't convey any extra useful information.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

The view tracker is an interesting proposition I currently use uMatrix to have fine-grained control over what is getting loaded amd some sites are downright unholy in how much thrid-party stuff gets loaded to display a site.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

I'm surprised "Customizable UI" was so high, I'm pretty sure I was one of those who marked it down as "want least." I guess it's cool, but I prefer the browser to get out of my way instead of being something I spend time messing with.

That said, I'm happy and not particularly surprised that AI didn't show up anywhere in the top-10.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 5 points 3 months ago
[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Guys, can't seem to find split view. Search hasn't been helpful nor going through the settings. Any tip on how to find/use it?

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Yes, that's it. Didn't realise it's an add-on. Thanks, Charmain Meow (spare the sparrows this time 😄 ).

This is gonna be very useful! 😃

[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Unfortunatly this wasn't Android exclusive. The Firefox Android App sucked ass in the past and will probably suck ass for the foreseeable future. There are currently multiple support and Reddit threads going about insane battery drain and heat build-up caused by the Firefox App (even when suspended and battery optimized). The UI is barebones and lacks basic features like closing tabs from the navigation bar or opening new tabs by scrolling left on the rightmost tab. Even something as simple as having actual tabs akin to the desktop version is not present, instead you have a tab list or grid view that barely manages to load previews for each open website. The native video player also hasn't been touched in a literal decade.

All in all Firefox Android is a horrible experience that has only the ability to use extensions going for it.

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

Really? Performance-wise, Firefox on Android runs great for me. No battery drain.

It is lacking in a lot of features though.

[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

At least for me, it does. It got so bad that watching a Twitch stream caused my phone to overheat to the point of freezing up and turning off. In comparison, the offical Twitch app doesn't cause the same issue, neither does Brave. Watching YouTube on Firefox drains the battery basically 2% per minute. OK, my phone is older and runs a custom rom, but other apps run flawlessly.

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
134 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

18079 readers
553 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS