256
submitted 1 day ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

The Supreme Court will begin a new term on Monday, in which it is set to hear pivotal cases for transgender and LGBTQ rights, for our environment, and gun violence. But the term’s biggest blockbuster could be a case that not only hasn’t yet been filed, but is still just a concept.

That’s because in the next three months, the justices may be asked to inject themselves into the late stages of the 2024 election. If presented with such an opportunity, this could be the term that the Supreme Court elects Donald Trump.

The high court has already been a player in this election. Last term, the justices ensured that Trump’s attempt to steal 2020’s election could not disqualify him from the presidency, issuing a decision assuring he would appear on every ballot. The court delayed Trump’s criminal trial over his attempted coup, then granted him broad immunity from criminal prosecution, preventing damaging courtroom revelations from emerging before voting. In August, the court used its shadow docket to allow Arizona, a key swing state, to require proof of citizenship with voter registration forms at the request of the Republican National Committee.

But perhaps least known—and yet, most important—was Moore v. Harper, a 2023 ruling in which the court set the stage for the next Bush v. Gore scenario by holding that the justices themselves would have the last say when it comes to questions over state-level election rules and disputes.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Serious question: Is there a non-violent solution to fascism?

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Probably not, the level of violence might be minimized though

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Education, so, no.

[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago

I'm so sick of everyone trying to normalize this. Accept it before it's even happened. It's up to the American people whether this is tolerated or not. Accepted or not. Everyone can either roll over and accept the end of our democracy or they can take to the streets and do something about it.

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

I'm not accepting it, but I'm expecting it. I'm also expecting there to be a few quiet protests followed by silence.

[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Be the change you want to see if that happens.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago

if they had no shame in 2000, let alone 2024

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

And this time one of the parties personally appointed 1/3 of the court.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They didn't overthrow 2020 though, maybe they understand if they push it too far the house of cards will fall.

[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The complacent generations that have allowed the erosion of our freedoms and liberty allowed it. Will the younger generations of today do the same?? I think not.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

Thomas, Roberts, Kavanagh, and Barrett all had involvement in supporting the Bush side of Bush vs Gore in 2000. It's more than a little likely that Kavanagh and Roberts owe their current positions for their roles in that case. Barrett seemed to have much less involvement, but likely still a plus for her in her nomination process.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 43 points 1 day ago

Denying the will of the people has historically had some pretty ugly outcomes, I really hope they don't.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago

I hope the American public has the will to make it ugly for them, if necessary.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 29 points 1 day ago

I'm going with no.

We'll all rush to social media, post about guillotines and then go back to work like we always do.

I'm generally not one to advocate for violence, but if they pull this shit again we better fucking get violent. :(

[-] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 18 points 1 day ago

The average person has no clue how to deal with simple anti-protest tactics like tear gas or pepper spray, so I doubt they'd be willing to risk their actual lives fighting against trained police officers or military forces.

An arrest likely also means being fired and 1/4 of US residents have less than $1000 in savings.

To the first, yep, it definitely won't work. It's too bad we know the addresses of the actual assholes doing all this, but (nearly) all protesting is carried out in... some other stratosphere of the vicinity.

As for the second? Yup. I've got three dependents to take care of and various other people who I help out. There's no way I can contemplate letting them all suffer if something happened to my income. We're wage slaves.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

It's not gonna happen. We still have McDonald's and Netflix. (Bread and circuses is kind of dated at this point.)

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Trump is ineligible to hold office.

SCOTUS ruled he can be on the ballot, not that he is eligible to hold the position.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago

If they ruled he can be on the ballot, they're ok with him holding office. Don't fool yourself.

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

I'm ready for a Tyson v Supreme Court. 10 rounds anything goes.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

He would take a bite out of crime

[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I ear what you’re saying.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah, IDK if I'll be sticking around for that. I hear Canada still has the rule of law though!

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

How do you intend to move to Canada?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Personally, I married a Canadian. It worked out great - I get two Thanksgiving turkeys a year!

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

That's awesome, but not typically an option for most people.

[-] Irremarkable@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Not with that attitude

[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Pierre Poilievre is going to have to add “stop the invasion on our southern border” to his stump speech.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

He's already stumping on it to the Canadians so caught up in the fucking fox news bubble that they think Mexico is on our southern border.

Why the fucking hell is Trudeau going to hand the election to such a fucking clown.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Same as many think we have a 2nd Amendment.

Like, wtf Canada???

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Driving is the easiest way.

;)

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Doesn't really work that way.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That's why I put a wink after my comment.

;)

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
256 points (98.1% liked)

News

23051 readers
3053 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS