397

Democrats suspect Netanyahu attempting to tilt Trump-Harris race (thehill.com)

submitted 1 day ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] formergijoe@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago

[-] leftist_lawyer@lemmy.today 17 points 6 hours ago

Gee Whiz ... pretty easy way to solve that problem. STOP SENDING THEM AID AND WEAPONS!!!

[-] leftist_lawyer@lemmy.today 9 points 6 hours ago

I mean seriously, it's like complaining about stepping on rakes while continuing to sprint through a field of rakes.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 8 hours ago

They gonna do anything about it or continue to bend over backwards?

I'm betting just more finger wagging while competing to be the most pro zionists in Washington

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The DNC as a whole have been trying to remove PACs and undo Citizens United, which alone would gut Netanyahu's influence in the USA.

EDIT: Since this is somehow controversial, the AIPAC is a pipeline of campaign funding directly from Israel. Democrats have on several occasions pushed bills that would overturn citizens united which fail to pass both chambers of congress including HR1 For the People Act

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

AIPAC is a pipeline of campaign funding directly from Israel.

Direction and Policies come from Israel, bit does money come directly from Israel?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

Semantics but I suppose its fair criticism of my poor wording. The direct source of AIPAC funds comes from American Donors, and how or when those organizations or inidividuals got the funds isn't publicly disclosed.

But it is a lot of fucking money for sure.

[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I'm waiting for the strikes on Iran.

Because they don't want another nuclear deal.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

Oh! Which candidate does he prefer??

[-] Chill_Dan@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

duh.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 39 points 16 hours ago

Damn, full support for a genocide that is unpopular with their own electorate, and this is the thanks they get? If you're willing to lose due to principles, at least make them good principles.

load more comments (21 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024

397 points (96.7% liked)

World News

38744 readers

2330 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.