598
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MTK@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don't like the idea of AI giving me "facts" since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

So what about open source self hosted search engines? If it requires some hardware I'd gladly team up with a small group of people to finance a bigass server that just gets us our personal search engine

Any good ones out there?

[-] LonelyNematocyst@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

There's stuff like Searxng or whoogle, but these aren't "real" search engines, merely "search aggregators" - they relay requests to a bunch of actual search engines, like bing or google, and aggregate the results. That's why they don't require tons of compute and scraping, and also why they often fail to work (since the search engines in question don't like or allow this). I believe it's not feasible to run a "real" search engine alone or even as a small group of people - according to this comment you need a powerful server with terabytes* of drive, hundreds of gigabytes of RAM and a lot of compute - and all of this will just let you crawl some top domains, nowhere near a good chunk of the internet.

*which sounds low actually, I would have expected more for this

[-] MTK@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Searxng, but there are plenty of instances already

[-] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Perplexica is interesting too, but it uses a moderate amount of ram because of elastic search.

And of course you need to have ollama running

[-] MTK@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[-] vxx@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

You only tested Google and Bing.

Qwant and DDG both use the Bing architecture.

I agree though, search engines have become noticeably worse the last 2 years.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

It's intentional.

Obviously, Google makes money showing ads during search. But they have finally bit the bullet and starting tarpitting users in search in order to show more ads.

A quick, useful, and accurate search means that you're on their site for the least amount of time, perhaps mere seconds. That's not what's best for revenue growth.

PS: Go try Kagi and be reminded what good clean search results look like. I use it because my time has value. It's very good.

[-] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

There are no search engines besides Google and Bing, because everyone else just uses Bing under the hood.

Kagi is great. It’s a paid service but you can try 100 searches for free.

You can use the Orion browser on iOS and set Kagi as the search engine.

[-] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You know what I miss? Search engines that honored Boolean operators. I am often looking for niche results and being able to -, ! and NOT is incredibly useful. But that's just not a thing anymore. I know part of it is that SEO includes antonym meta data that ruins this but it would still be helpful on occasion.

[-] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago

I’ve been using Mojeek lately and it looks like their advanced search can do some of that.

https://www.mojeek.com/advanced.html

Reminds me of early Google search.

[-] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I have it a test with some operators from the search bar instead of using the form and it did exactly what it was supposed to. I'll keep this on hand. Thank you.

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

It becomes more and more true every day.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Jesus, the "plandemic" explanation for why the Internet is dying. The Internet IS clearly dying, but this is stupid. Even if we got rid of all the bots and AI, the Internet would still be dying, because open protocols are not as exploitable as walled gardens. The value of capital in the world overwhelms the value of human labour and human interest, and all our social structures conform to the needs of capital over time.

[-] sandbox@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

It doesn’t really, it’s just that human activity on the internet is more and more taking place on platforms without any search indexing. 20 years ago, internet forum are where you’d go for advice online. Nowadays, it’s more and more becoming discord servers and similar, which just aren’t indexed by internet search.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Whats funny and kind of sad, is that they know exactly what you're searching for, and don't give any fucks about showing you that, and instead will show you this cool other thing that they're getting their beak wet on thats like, eh... kinda related to what you typed in. Google didn't get dumber, they just don't have any meaningful competition which would force them to deliver high quality results, and instead of enshittified their results to the point where they're practically useless.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 24 points 1 day ago

Kagi is working very well for me! and honestly i like that it's a paid service.

[-] darreninthenet@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Another vote for Kagi here as well... except for searching for local businesses near where I live, I revert to Google for that, but I Google through Kagi so privacy is somewhat protected

[-] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I know there's some controversy but its spoiled me now, it just works

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 7 points 23 hours ago

Infinitely worse. I barely use search engines for issues these days and no longer recommend that people "Google" things.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 3 points 19 hours ago

Besides be sad and hit my head against a wall? Depending on the query, I'll sometimes use ChatGPT or find an associated Discord, subreddit or somewhere and hope for the best.

I'm disappointed a lot.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago

I bang my head against search engines. Normally I can find something decent after multiple searches, but it never used to be this way.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] Hasherm0n@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Lately I google for someone that should give me a direct, exact result. First five links are fucking paid ads.

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I just use chatGPT to search now. I have a super-prompt in its memory telling it how to search and to cite sources and provide links and it is so much better than Google even though it's using AI, too.

*The future is now, old men!

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Kagi is pretty awesome

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

It's not just you. At some point, search's primary purpose went from "finding the information you're looking for" to "getting paid to put links in front of you". Then they kept iterating on it, quarter by quarter, for a very long time.

[-] detective__mcnulty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I agree with you. It has gotten worse.

[-] Shape4985@lemmy.ml 0 points 14 hours ago

Brave has their own search. There is also meta searches such as metager, searx and mojeek. I hope more search engines enter the market

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 120 points 1 day ago

It's not just you. Search got worse, and it did so intentionally.

Ed Zitron lays it all out really well, with all the receipts, but the basic version is this; Google has an incentive to make you search more for the same things, because then they can show you more ads. And google is, first and foremost, an ad delivery company. Every "product" they own is an ad delivery vehicle. It's not just AI slop that made search based; Google made search bad, and everyone else followed suit, to a greater or lesser degree.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

The whole internet is in the process of being filled with garbage content. Search engines are bad but also there's not much good content left to find (in % of the total)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

theyve all been bought and paid for and not by you.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 61 points 1 day ago

It is, and it's not just the search engines to blame.

The content out there is incredibly spammy. It doesn't pay to create good content. It pays to make a pool of AI gunge based on what people search for and then stick ads on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The other day I googled how long should I broil a ribeye steak and the google AI told me to broil it for 45 minutes.

Broil is the hottest setting on the oven and you’re supposed to broil the meat as close to the burner as possible. This would probably burn down your house.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago

Its not AIs fault, its advertising based SEOs fault. Search has been broken for years for many topics.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Zink@programming.dev 37 points 1 day ago

My experience is that search engines are still decent at finding niche information that would normally be hard to find. But for anything mainstream, for instance any household product that should be easy to find information about, instead how about these 300 pages of top 10 lists of Amazon affiliate links buried under AI generated filler?

[-] JollyG@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I often have the opposite experience when looking for technical documentation about programming libraries. For example I will be dealing with a particular bug and will google the library name plus some descriptive terms related to the bug, and I get back general information about the library. In those cases, it seems google often ignores the supplemental information and focuses only on the library name as If I were looking for general information.

What is worse is that the top results are always blog-spam companies that just seem to be copying the documentation pages of whatever language or library I was looking at.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Arkhive@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

4get.ca

Has been very refreshing to use. It’s a bit slow, and you need to do a captcha periodically because they get hella bot spam. It’s got a clean interface, no sponsored results and other junk, and so far it’s felt like “old google” more than anything else. Plus they have my preferred color scheme as a built in option!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 152 points 2 days ago

they're pretty bad, but ddg at least feels like I'm getting actual results.

load more comments (48 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
598 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

58591 readers
4433 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS