Daniel Radcliffe looks terrible now.
More likely this is the Express stirring things up. As newspapers go, it's rancid dog shit.
The article says Buenos Aires as if it's the Argentine government making political statements. Apparently the "tensions" are coming from a union which is kinda weird. But not surprised by the article seeing OPs posting history
But not surprised by the article seeing OPs posting history
Yep, new account posting shit from the Sun and Express is an easy block.
Must be a day ending in Y.
However, his statement provoked a furious response from Argentina's union the General Confederation of Labour (CGT).
I guess a labor union, not associated with the Argentine government, making a statement about the falklands equates to rising international geopolitical tensions. Argentina lives rent free in the head of British nationalists.
Javier Milei would really be a great cast for an Austin Powers villain. The guy looks more cartoonish every time I see him.
The irony here is that Milei would be the last person to stir up territorial disputes against the UK. He is a total simp for the capitalist anglosphere.
I actually know very little about his political agenda. I just can't help but wonder if this strange look is part of his political antics.
Nah, it's Argentinian look. At least the hairstyle. Look up Carlos Menem, another Argentinian president. Wiggy hair and sideburns.
I did not know that either. I mean it's a cool look, just very 70s.
"Las Malvinas" tensions... FTFY
Basically no one who lives there calls it that. I'm pretty sure they get to decide.
Also when the topic comes up for vote, there is an exceptional majority for remaining an overseas territory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_referendum
On a turnout of 92%, 99.8% voted to remain a British territory, with only three votes against.[5] Had the islanders rejected the continuation of their current status, a second referendum on possible alternatives would have been held.[4] Brad Smith, the leader of the international observer group, announced that the referendum was free and fair and executed in accordance with international standards and international laws.
Apparently certain fans of Argentina don't care what the people who actually live on the island think.
Sort of reminds me of their ancestors.
Not to mention...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquest_of_the_Desert
And...
Hahaha glass houses buddy
It's the penguins I feel sorry for.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starrmer
No double "r" on "Starmer".
Unless you're from Somerset
Oi loike Keir Starrmer!
What do the Falklands want?
To remain British.
And overwhelmingly so. There was a referendum in 2013 with 92% turnout and 99.8% were in favour of staying British
Reason for this was the region was and is settled by British sailors. Most of the people are of British descent, people speak English etc. At the end of the day, they are tiny islands with 3k people living on them. They are a great source of saber rattling by Argentina and nothing more.
A great source of oil now it seems. Hence the renewed saber rattling.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/