57

My father is convinced Elon is an idealist but I'd like to show him he's been misled

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sprucie@feddit.uk 21 points 4 hours ago

There was the classic case where he said he was such a free speech absolutuonist that he wouldn't ban the person who was tracking his plane. Guess what happened shortly afterwards

[-] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 27 points 5 hours ago

you would have received more relevant responses if you had titled your post as, "there is absolutely no evidence that musk is against free speech. what are you folks on about, anyway?"

[-] PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 13 points 4 hours ago

Ah, that's de Morgan's law.

[-] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol 1 points 33 minutes ago

Actually...

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago

I wouldn't bother. People who arrive at any opinion without using logic can't be reasoned out of that opinion using logic. It's an emotional thing.

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 36 points 8 hours ago

As for your original question: Musk helps oppressive states enforce censorship on his platform .

His passion for free speech is only for white supremacists and conspiracy theorists now running rampant on his platform (there is a John Oliver segment about it).

He opposed an anti-hate-speech law in Ireland, although the law makes clear that it is still allowed to express unfavorable opinions and offend others, but forbids incitement to violence.

This shows he is not interested in defending "unfavorable reasoning" against the "woke" inquisitors, rather than advancing hate-speech and white supremacist causes in particular. This is not only a hypothesis, but a reported outcome of his actions with X/Twitter, which is now a nazi bar.

Don't forget Russel's tolerance paradox: If you tolerate nazis in order to defend freedom (of speech, political association, and the like), they will overtake the state apparatus and verbot freedoms for everyone, not only speech, but freedom of life as well.

He is doing exactly that, not only permitting, but promoting white supremacy, and at the same time treating the term "cisgender" for example as a slur.

This shows he is not all in for defending free-speech for all sides, but he is out to "destroy to woke mind virus" because it "stole his son from him".

Musk is a nazi apologist, a big cry baby, and a media gatekeeper who enforces censorship both as a platform owner and as a service to totalitarian states.

He is a national security risk, according to Wired.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

He is a national security risk, according to Wired.

He is a member of the national security state. He and the security state are deeply in bed with each other. Much of his income is from the military-intelligence-industrial complex, coming straight from the federal government. The US is an oligarchy, and he is one of the most powerful & influential oligarchs. He’s literally the richest person on earth at the moment, and already has enormous influence on the state.

Why did he buy Twitter? To control the conversation, to manage public opinion. He bought it to 1) censor it and 2) inject propaganda into it.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

I still think Twitter was just a fuck up on his side

Else it would be A+ psyop role playing and looking at all those bright minds, I don't see a possibility for them acting accordingly to a sinister plan.

I just want to make clear, that I don't think it's some kind of dark deep state issue, but much more a systematic issue, caused by Imperial capitalism - not saying you implied it, I just wanted to clarify

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

Very good point indeed.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 9 hours ago
[-] Vanth@reddthat.com 14 points 9 hours ago

Assuming your intentions are genuine and this isn't a trolling attempt, I would suggest you start with a web search for "musk free speech hypocrite". Plenty of articles out there.

Good luck with your father.

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 hours ago

The Hyperloop still hasn't happened in an age where we can grab rockets from the sky.

It was just a great idea to stop development of high-speed rail so cars could still make sense for longer.

Hopefully USA seems to be realising already: https://techcrunch.com/2023/12/22/hyperloop-one-elon-musk-high-speed-rail/

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

I mean hyperloop is just "train, but bad". No clue what people ever saw in that "tech".

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

The more useful framing might be someone like Ford.

I'd be hard pressed to argue Musk hasn't had some sort of a hand in a couple significant technological movements (Tesla, SpaceX) but that doesn't make his political positions worthy of respect.

Similarly, for all his flaws, Ford revolutionized the factory. That didn't make his Brazilian city work, his shitty anti semetic views right or his "meh" attitudes on ww2 correct.

Musk's successes don't particularly quality him on everything.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Meh attitudes to ww2, puts it lightly.

Hitler loved him and afaik Ford was also invited over and got some medal or something

The USA was a fan of Hitler for quite some time. So if course there were people sympathetic with Nazi Germany

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago

In a society that values money above everything else, his status as richest person for lots of people makes his views seem relevant, even if unconsciously so. Then there come the fanboys to idolize him. But let's consider the obsession with wealth that creates this halo effect even in the "non-fan-boys". Musk, Trump, Tate, should all be irrelevant, but they're not, which is in fact a systemic problem.

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

This man likely wants to be president, but cannot, so he’s riding the Trump train instead. As such, I suspect you can find him bending on free speech and leaning into incitement of more Jan 6 treason quite a bit in regards to that personal motive.

[-] walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz 2 points 9 hours ago

You can't reason with an irrational opinion. I applaud you for trying, but don't blame yourself if it doesn't work.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I doubt you'll find any proof that he is against free speech. More like, he cares about other things more than he cares about free speech. Such as his bank account.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
57 points (82.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43611 readers
1182 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS