283

You always hear the phase “9 to 5” and also the song with the same name. Assuming you include 1 hour worth of breaks (30 minute lunch and two 15 minute breaks), you’re only working for 7 hours a day which comes up to 35 hours a week.

Now it feels like you have to work 8 hours a day (for a total of 40 hours of actual work), plus your other time off meaning you’re really there for 9 hours each day (for a total of 45 hours). Am i looking at that wrong, or did expected times change, and if so, when?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] weariedfae@lemmy.world 238 points 2 months ago

Everything changed. You're not crazy. If you watch movies made before the 2000s about office culture, including the movie 9 to 5, you can see that the hours included a lunch break. Which was paid.

Yes, those of the older generation had it easier in every way.

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 99 points 2 months ago

Is this a US thing? Do you not get paid for your lunch hour? That's wild.

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 62 points 2 months ago

Most people don't. So, for an average employee, it would be 9-530 to account for their unpaid 30m lunch required by law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

In the US, you're lucky if you get paid for the hours you work. And many don't get all of their hours paid.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago

I live in Canada. We get a half-hour lunch that isn't paid in my province.

Also, if you take more than 3 sick days a year, your boss can fire you. And the 3 sick days are unpaid. The government lowered the number from 10 to 3 shortly before the pandemic, and didn't raise it again! Oh, and to count, your boss can demand a doctor's note. Which cost money to the patient.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 8 points 2 months ago

Ha! Hour. You’re funny. Federal law only gives half an hour.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago

Those old tv shows where they casually eat breakfast before work make more sense. They weren't up at 6, rushing to get to work by 8. They had a whole hour more.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 months ago

They also had someone to make it for them. One income was enough for the household.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 96 points 2 months ago

I am 51. When I started working my job was 9-5 with a one hour lunch an unofficial 30 minute coffee break and about four unofficial ten minute smoke breaks.

[-] pulverizedcoccyx@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago

What's it like for you now?

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

Retired in a 3-bedroom home paid off that was purchased for $57,000.

/kidding

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You're thinking boomer so you are off by ~20 years.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago

My company went full time "work from home" in 2012 and we are specialists that are only brought in when everyone else has fucked up. So basically, I am on call 24/7/365.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago

You're thinking small-time, like an hourly worker. Good office jobs are generally salaried positions and the idea of clocking in and out is... not a thing. Some days you work more, some less, whatever needs to be done. The idea of 9-5 is just a general time frame. And no one gives a shit when you lunch or break. In a real profession the yardstick is, are you getting it done or not?

I'll catch grief for saying that, so I'll preempt by saying, if your job isn't like that, you likely have a shit job.

[-] radroot@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

Gentle reminder that without "small time", hourly workers doing real labor your easy, sweatless, office job would disappear overnight. Perhaps some gratitude? Maybe even some solidarity?

As a former IT professional turned baker, I dislike the condescending attitude too many white collar workers have toward the actual wheel turners of the world.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago

"doing real labor" "easy, sweatless, office job" "the actual wheel turners"

"I dislike the condescending attitude"

It never ceases to amaze me how often people see and hate shit in other people that they epitomize themselves.

And honestly, my experience has been the opposite and I see the condescending attitude, at least more openly, coming from blue collar workers more often.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lepsea@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 months ago

Me laughing in salaried 9-5 with clock in and clock out. Pay deduction if i forget to do clock in or out even if everyone know i work that day. Got paid 50% less than people who did the same job same position who didn't need to clock in/out.

I have a shit job and the only thing that keep me going is the job close to where i and my family live so i can check on my sister (found out that she do self harm once and I'm scared to go faraway from her ever since).

Desperate people make a good cheap employee.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have a salaried position. I don't clock in. But it's typically only used to deny us overtime pay. If I work 35 hours a week, I'm paid 12.5% less than my colleagues who do 40. And if my lunch break is too long, I'm expected to stay late sometime within the month to compensate.

And while I do have a shit job (save me) I've never seen someone whose employer didn't mind their hours as long as they got shit done.

[-] JamesFire@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

You cannot be salaried and deducted hours you don't work.

Either you are hourly, and paid for the hours you actually work, or you're salaried, and paid regardless of how many hours you work.

What your employer is doing is illegal, and wage theft.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago

You're not an exempt (salaried) employee if they deduct your pay for working less in a given week. I've never had an employer who cared about hours as long as work got done.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bilbo_Haggins@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Lolol what kind of fantasy world do you live in? Salaried worker here and although my job isn't 9-5 strictly if I don't work at least 40 hours a week my pay will be docked. So I get to choose between 8-5 or 9-6 or I can work while I eat and get that cushy 9-5 life. Or if I miss work I can make up those hours by working at night. It's a real luxury to be able to do that compared to shift work, but the hours are still being counted.

Also stop being so entitled. Most of your life necessities come from industries (groceries, power plants, gas stations, hospitals, etc) where people work on a timecard/shift basis so don't you come out here and pretend timecard or shift work isn't a "real" profession.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 38 points 2 months ago

USA. Been working 20 years. Every job has been 8 to 5, unpaid 1h lunch, 2x15min paid breaks. :(

[-] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

The last time I worked hourly was the late 90s. We got a paid 15 break per 4 hours worked. If we worked more than 6 hours, we also got an unpaid 30 minute lunch. I got no benefits because I was part-time at 37.5 hours per week.

[-] spongeborgcubepants@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

37.5 hours

part-time

crazy, in my world that's pretty much full time

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

Yes. And if you interview for an 8 to 5 job, you tell them that it sounds like a crock of shit and you don't want the job.

So sick of that shit. Fuck any employer who pulls this shit.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

I don't WANT your crock of shit job! I'll go live on the streets!!! I'll give blowjobs for $20! And hey.....you want a blowjob? Got $20?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not to mention commute time, time spent getting ready for work/bed, and time spent sleeping. I don't consider any of that to be free time.

I work 10 hour shifts, so once you factor in all that stuff, I get about two full hours for myself each day to do whatever I want, before I have to start the process all over again for tomorrow.

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 24 points 2 months ago

As a guy with an actual office job. It's usually 8-5 or 9-6 with an hour lunch, plus whatever time you spend on coffee or whatever.

It's pretty standard, and it's been that way for a couple decades at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago

Where are you working where you are expected to work through your breaks? 9-5 should include your break times as well, yes.

[-] Steve@communick.news 63 points 2 months ago
[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago

Most jobs I've had will schedule 8-430/9-530/etc, so that you work a full 8 hours but you have a 30min mandatory unpaid lunch break. The two 15 min breaks are paid, but they were also "discouraged."

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Sundial@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

Sounds like you've been taken advantage of. Assuming you live in a western country they should have some kind of department for labor violations you can escalate to if it comes that.

[-] Steve@communick.news 31 points 2 months ago

I'm in the US.

I've never had a job tell us we can't take our 15s. But most places keep staffing tight enough, and busy enough, that people feel guilty taking a 15 unless they have a real reason to.

Personally, I find them kind of frustrating. By the time I begin to calm down, it's time to head back. It's not even like a real break. Where I am now, 30min is auto deduced for lunch, so we take 45min lunches most of the time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] superkret@feddit.org 9 points 2 months ago

I'm in Germany. I'm 40 years old. And this year, for the first time in my life, I work in a job that is 9 to 5 with an hour of breaks.
Which counts as 7 working hours. Because the breaks are not included as work time. Never have been. In none of the official, unionized jobs I ever worked.

[-] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Raffster@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Hour long mandatory lunch, no pay. Switzerland.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] seppoenarvi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Having worked in a couple of European countries, I thought 7.5 hours of work plus a half an hour lunch break is the norm everywhere in the western world. So the 9 to 5 did totally make sense to me. I was honestly surprised reading all these comments.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] azdle@news.idlestate.org 13 points 2 months ago

It has definitely changed, I don't know when, but it's been like this for at least the last decade.

Though, in my experience (NB: I'm a software engineer, which is a notoriously lax field.) only what the piece of paper says has changed. Hell, most of my employee handbooks have claimed that "full time" is 50 hours a week. They get away with it because I'm classified as a "computer employee" (lol) and make more than $35k/year (super lol) which means my employment is exempted from minimum wage and overtime pay laws.

Nobody that I know actually works that consistently. Most people I know don't even do 40. I do 9-5 (or 8:30-4:30 usually), I take breaks when I need them and nobody has ever complained to me about the amount I'm working.

My only guess for why it's this way is that having that be the official working time means it's easier to fire anyone for no reason because they're not working their "contractually obligated" amount of time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JackLSauce@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Different jobs are different

Sorry for rambling

[-] urquell@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Dutch law describes a mandatory break of 30 minutes (or 2 15 minute breakes) if a working day is longer that 5.5 hours. Break is not work, thus not payed.

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/werktijden/vraag-en-antwoord/wettelijke-regels-pauzes-tijdens-werk

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

This neglects that the breaks are not free time spent as desired and is entirely constrained to the circumstances of employment. You would not eat or do the same tasks in the timespan. Therefore it is not your time and should be compensated for. Like owning a vehicle, you still own it even when you are not driving it or it is broken down. Pretending ownership is only limited to the time the vehicle is in gear and moving is delusional logic for any such pro slavery State. Employment must include far more ethical responsibly than this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
283 points (99.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36199 readers
562 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS