56
submitted 2 days ago by Quail4789@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I have a WebDav server that contains some movies and shows. I use Infuse on Apple stuff and NOVA Video Player on Android to watch these. The directory is not organized, file names aren't manually adjusted, and the movies and shows are mixed together. Yet, both of these programs are able to index recursively, get metadata, create a library and let me watch my media without issues.

Kodi, on the other hand, seems to be unable to index nested directories, requires you to tell it what type of media is in the individual directories and cannot identify anything correctly unless I go and manually rename directories/files. It also is exclusive for TV usage and not very suitable for desktop.

So, are there alternative programs to Kodi, ideally better suited to desktop usage or extensions I can install to make it work properly?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

Idk if this is actually a good idea, but I would try using a media server like mediatomb to index the files and serve them to Kodi. It's been a while so I don't remember if it was mediatomb that did the organization or not.

[-] Majestic@lemmy.ml 1 points 29 minutes ago

The real answer is organize your library. There's no reason to have it like that.

At least create two folders "Movies" and "TV Shows" or however you want to name them. Put movies in the movies sub-folder, ideally in named folders that match the name of the movie (so Movies/The Godfather (1972)/moviefile.mkv) and TV shows in the other folder again with a subfolder for each show with year included.

The best way to do this is to use a media manager when adding files. Something like mediaelch or tiny media manager and scrape your films and ideally tv shows as well and create local metadata for them that you save. Both can do renaming though tmm does it slightly better if you pay for the subscription version and it can automatically scrape and rename your library along with creating the relevant nfo files and things like posters so Kodi just works.

I guess you could try connecting Kodi to another service. If you're okay running Plex on some other machine or Jellyfin you can connect Kodi to that if they scrape it all properly but most likely they'll have issues as well because the only real solution is organizing your library. There are paid tools as I mention as well as free ones. Filebot is another paid tool that does organization and such.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 8 points 13 hours ago

The directory is not organized, file names aren't manually adjusted, and the movies and shows are mixed together

Disgusting

[-] Meeper@reddthat.com 2 points 15 hours ago

Stremio, stopped using Kodi ever since.

[-] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Is there a reason you don't want the files organized? Id suggest using radarr or something else to organize them first.

As an alternative to kodi, jellyfin is great.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 11 hours ago

Kodi is a frontend.

Jellyfin is a server.

Jellyfin is not a replacement for Kodi. Jellyfin would replace OPs WebDAV server, but that's not the question being asked.

[-] LucidBoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 13 hours ago

can't go wrong with jellyfin + this way you help out by seeding if you go down the tracker route too

[-] Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

I use Jellyfin in conjunction with Kodi. Basically I only have Kodi as front-end, as it treats subtitles better than the Jellyfin client does. Works great.

[-] Templa@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago

The directory is not organized, file names aren’t manually adjusted, and the movies and shows are mixed together.

Sounds like a nightmare for me

[-] Psiczar@aussie.zone 11 points 1 day ago

I was a long time Kodi user from back when it was called XBMC.

About 5 years ago I got tired of messing about with managing media, editing config files and installing addons. Moved to Emby first, and now I am on Jellyfin. No media management required, the backend server does it all for me and the front end is great, never gives me any problems and plays everything. I run the front end on multiple Nvidia Shields with no performance issues.

I’d manage your media better with movies and TV in separate parent folders and not all mixed together. When you setup Jellyfin, you point it at a folder and tell it what media type it is. Mixing up different media types in the same folder structure just makes things harder than they need to be for no gain.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] utopiah@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

I used Kodi with LibreElec for years in a similar setup. It was nice... but in practice I didn't really use the "cool" functionalities (like indexing, image preview, Web remote control, etc) so instead I checked how Kodi works and noticed DLNA. I saw that my favorite video player, namely VLC, supports DLNA. I then looking for DLNA server on Linux, found few and stuck to the simplest I found, namely minidlna. It's quite basic, at the least the way I use it, but for my usage it's enough :

  • install VLC on clients, including Android video projector, phones, XR HMDs, etc
  • install minidlna on server (RPi5)
  • configure minidlna to serve the right directory with subdirectories ( /var/lib/minidlna by default )
  • configure few extra software that get videos to push them (via scp script and ssh-key) to rpi5:/var/lib/minidlna/

voila... very reliable setup (been using for more than a year on a daily basis.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 2 days ago

kodi is best as a front-end for an already curated library. ive used it extensively since the xbmc days...

i use mediaelch to scrape, generate metadata files and rename files and folders into a standard way. it [can] generate things in a kodi-compatible format. kodi is set to just pull in that data. i concurrently use emby (jellyfin) to access that same metadata.

your problem is conflating the curation of your library with the applications that will use it.

kodi does need a full computer to run. thats where emby comes in. its for viewing the same shit on any other device

[-] Quail4789@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

your problem is conflating the curation of your library with the applications that will use it.

This is not some extremely hard job that's way out of the scope of a media center. As I said, other platforms already have applications that can do this without breaking a sweat. I've never had to manually organize my files in years in any other platform.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 2 days ago

i cant even imagine wanting a mess of stuff as you describe, or expecting some media app to manage that mess on the fly. but hey, if thats how you want it. good luck.

ive got 2500 movies and > 35,000 episodes in my library.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the mediaelch tip !

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 9 points 1 day ago

Just organize your library properly and pretty much every software will manage it better. There are options for organizing and renaming them mostly automatically, like EastTAG or filebot. Some people use Sonarr and Radarr to organize shows and movies, but those are probably overkill for you. The various *arrs will be more useful if you're consuming new media through a server hosting Plex or Jellyfin. Kodi is also a waste if the library isn't already meticulously organized and you don't need a 10 foot interface.

If you're only consuming on desktop and you insist on being disorganized, then why even bother with anything other than VLC? It runs on Linux, Windows, iOS, and Android.

[-] blackbrook@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

People keep talking about needing to "organize your library" but what do you mean by that? Is metadata tagging sufficient? Or does Kodi care about filenames and directory structure?

[-] Lem453@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Sonarr puts shows in

  • show folder
  • season folder
  • show name - S01E01 - episode name.mp4
[-] klep@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Wait, is this not standard practice?

I've always organized media files this way; I index my music similarly.

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Which is why most people don't even realize this is a requirement. Also lots of us come from a time before these fancy players, so we needed to sort things out this way in order to find what we wanted.

To me, having a library be just files thrown in a folder regardless of show/movie/etc seems very messy.

[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Long time Kodi user, since it first came out on the original xbox.

Assuming you are a watch and delete person then for films you really do not need more that a seperate folder than you dump films AND only films into and make sure that the film name is correct AND it includes the accurate year for the film. Vast majority of downloads will already have this in place, I never have to bother to rename or move films about as they just go straight into my download folder that Kodi is looking for my watch and delete films. Older versions of Kodi used to be much more annoying for film scanning requiring proper spacing and so on. However its very very important that only films go into this directory otherwise it will fuck up if you start dumping TV programs into here.

TV is much more complex if Kodi is doing the metadata scanning as it normally relies on the top level folder name, and a proper season and episode numbering scheme. If you watching TV I would just switch to a managed downloader like sonarr, its a PITA to manually manage weekly show downloads anyway and sonarr will sort everything out for you.

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago

Is there a reason nobody is mentioning PLEX?

[-] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Because Jellyfin is free and not corporate.

[-] Zanathos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Plex is a taboo topic anymore because of their recent business-focused changes. I personally use Plex as I've been a user since the early 2000s with no intentions to learn the nuances of Jellyfin, and get my remote streamers moved over to it.

Plex mixed with Sonarr, Radarr and Overseer fits my needs perfectly.

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago

Thanks for the answer!

[-] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

The main alternatives to Kodi are Jellyfin and Plex but I suspect those will have the same problem if your library isn't organized. How well are NOVA and Infuse handling your library? Like are they able to tell queue up the next episode of a TV show? Because Kodi is basically trying to be more like a local Netflix than "just a video player".

Jellyfin and Plex are web-based so you'll get a a far more consistent experience across devices than Kodi. But they'll generally expect Movies to be in one folder, TV shows in another, and will have some expectations of the file name. They won't open the file to figure out what movie it is.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago
[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

None.

If somebody is using Kodi they're probably running in a kiosk style. On my install I don't even have XOrg or Wetland installed. Kodi is just running on kernel level graphics buffers (GBM).

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

I was asking the op what desktop environment they’re running, in response to their question

So, are there alternative programs to Kodi, ideally better suited to desktop usage or extensions I can install to make it work properly?

Kodi seems to be the wrong choice for what they want to do, but zeroing in on the right choice needs more information.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
56 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

47764 readers
862 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS