108
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

They will all be thoughtful genocide supporters.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Who vote against net neutrality?

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 day ago

Im sure plenty of these already exist

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 29 points 1 day ago

They can join lemmy.ml with the rest of the people who have 100 accounts each.

[-] cravl@slrpnk.net 4 points 23 hours ago

Everyone is a bot except you.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 2 points 17 hours ago

You’re not a bot. See how your comment is dumb?

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ironic comment to post in this article.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 21 hours ago

Projection is a hell of a drug I suppose.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 2 points 17 hours ago

I never said they were bots.

[-] disguised_doge@kbin.earth 15 points 1 day ago

What, disinformation from a government? I'm shocked, shocked I say.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Everyone else is allowed to do it, so why not them too? China, Russia, Brazil, Mali.

No wonder the poor western democracies feel left out!

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 17 points 1 day ago

You don't need AI for this, you just need to pay some Russians in vodka and fuzzy hats, Trump learned that years ago.

[-] fin@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago
[-] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

"deepfake" what is this, 2018?

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

this is insane. why can't we vote for them not to be able to do this? isn't this a democracy?

[-] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The US is, as a matter of fact, and never has been, a democracy. It has always been a representative republic. Direct democracy as your comment envisions it is very difficult to implement and results in mob rule. If this is something you strongly believe should be stopped, get in touch with your federal senator and congressional representative to make your views known. Call, email, write paper letters, and encourage others to do the same. Make it clear that they won't be reelected if they allow this to continue. We don't have lobbying money, but it's hard to keep taking bribes if they no longer have a position with which to provide a return on that investment.

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

contacting my representatives is exactly as useful as writing a letter to santa

[-] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Whose deepfake influencers do you "trust" more? US, China, russia and a few lesser players are already working to control the information space / spread propaganda (note: not necessarily/always lies, but there is typically a focus or spin) far and wide.

We know people are highly influenced by propaganda (some more than others, but all of us are) and that quantity and repetition plays a role. Since this is now an established battlefield, I'd like our (western) defences to be strong.

It has potential for abuse, certainly. That's par for the course. There is also the potential for it to be used to debunk fake news, shock people out of false beliefs, and help reconnect people to reality. Let's see how this plays out. popcorn time

[-] Draghetta@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

And the internet keeps getting more, and more dead.

[-] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hah. I hadn't seen that article / heard of the theory, but as far as crackpot theories/hypotheses go, it's one of the more likely (edit: to come about). I doubt it's anywhere near the majority yet, personally.

It was already obvious that propaganda news articles (on obscure websites) had orchestrated releases and promotion on social media, in a massive circle jerk, and I assumed machine generated/assisted content was involved. Then ChatGPT hit the headlines and we all had the power.

[-] Draghetta@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Of course, the theory is exaggerated.

But to be honest, every time I’m watching a video on yourube with more than a hundred comments and any kind of political relevance, I just assume at least 90% of the comments are bots. Same goes for twitter arguments.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

So where will those real people be in my Freenet web of trust?

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -5 points 1 day ago

So they can save money by firing their army of nafo meat puppets?

[-] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

well if they do this, then they're contributing to the poisoning of LLMs which may be a good or bad thing depending on your usage of chatgpt services

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Humanity isn't even "good" enough to not poison LLM's in the first place. I respect the optimism, though.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
108 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

58761 readers
4176 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS