25
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

This is one of the things I dislike about F1. Innovating withing regulations should be a big part of F1 but every time anyone innovates anything, everyone else goes "THAT'S CHEATING!". Either let innovations happen or turn F1 into a spec series. This constant crying foul is just boring.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Some innovations just aren't good ideas (like using rocket fuel). Some are outlawed because they'll cause a money war at the time (like active suspensions). Still others are outlawed due to the FIAs notion that it ruins the sport (like movable aerodynamic devices).

Clearly, Hamilton seems to think that this falls outside those categories.

[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Of this was used its enabling a setup change from qualy to race, which can be enormously beneficial if its ride height like this due to fuel load differences. Setup changes like this are banned to make teams compromise between qualy and race trim or accept performance losses for one or the other. It's meant as a small balancing measure for team performance and a reduction in costs .

In the old days, we had qualifying engines (not modes, entire single session engines), so it used to be full on extreme changes, I'm glad we don't anymore.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I have seen so many changes that I just accept them, but the days of qualifying engines were dramatic. Of course, there was a different way of qualifying at the time too. The whole idea of building an engine that would only last a short period of time was kinda cool. But, also very expensive.

In this case, your first Para is correct. Parc ferme is broken. But the problem is that with new materials being developed all the time, I can't help but thinking that the FIA is chasing their tails.

[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

But this sort of adjustment is very strictly against the rules, it was just another clever trick to work around the rules that were clarified as being illegal. We've had all sorts that are clearly against the intent of a rule while not always againstthe letterof the rule, and this is a big part of the fun with the engineering part of the sport. Taking that away and you lose a big part of the sport.

Only reason RB aren't completely in the shit is it's impossible to prove if they did actually use it. From the description, it seems possible to change it on the grid if you take the nose off and another cover. I would be surprised if they never used it tbh.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You should think of it this way. Why engineer something that can that can be adjusted from inside the cockpit, if you don't intend to adjust it there.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
25 points (87.9% liked)

Formula 1

9026 readers
66 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 18-20 Oct
πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ Mexico 25-27 Oct
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Brazil 01-03 Nov
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 21-23 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS