24
submitted 11 hours ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world

You can’t really gauge its Steam reviews because there are only 13(!) total so far, reflective of a game that has launched with just a few hundred players. 224, as I’m writing this article. Sub-Concord levels. Yes. Concord is a unit of measurement now.

The Concord legacy lives on.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FatherGascown@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago

Anyone that employs Sweet Baby deserves to fail. Good thing people are waking up to that.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

Besides the actual quality of the game, it seems like (stupid) people are complaining about DEI in this game? Why?

People are the worst.

[-] PunchingWood@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

From what I know Sweet Baby Inc. is involved. Which is a studio that focuses a lot on DEI when it comes to narratives/story in games.

They already did not have the greatest track record, some good games, but a lot of mediocre and even bad games. It doesn't necessarily mean that the game scores are related to DEI, but the fact it keeps happening to games they're involved with says at least something.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

The good games they've worked on have included some of the most praised games in recent years. If you want to ask why this keeps happening, you have to have massive blinders on to ignore the likes of God of War: Ragnarok and Alan Wake II, both firmly in recent memory, and also realize that basically no writer on earth could save something like Suicide Squad from its criticisms.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

No…TRUE Scotsman uses Sweet Baby Inc!

[-] PunchingWood@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Like I said, some good games. Which by the way still received criticism from people about certain DEI related involvements, whether you agree or disagree with that is different thing, but the criticism was there too.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

Anything not about straight white men will have people complaining about DEI bullshit. It's never a reason a game has failed. They fail because they're bad games. They might also include DEI stuff, but it's not the cause.

Edit: correction, those games listed are about straight white men. Anything that includes a character that is not a straight white man will have those people complaining. They're the most fragile people in the world.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

"Criticism" is a charitable word for what that is.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago
[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago

Remember that when Indiana Jones comes back with 8s and 9s.

[-] PunchingWood@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

That feels like very optimistic wishful thinking.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Does it? It's the people who made two very highly regarded Wolfenstein games making another game like those but with Indiana Jones.

[-] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Fuck I hope not, Indiana Jones absolutely should not be a shooter.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 58 minutes ago

I think it's pretty clear what the game is from the trailers, and it looks awesome. Hopefully the temple puzzles are actual puzzles, as opposed to something like Uncharted where Drake always has the answers in his deus ex machina book.

[-] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 26 points 11 hours ago

I follow gaming news pretty closely and I've never even heard of this one. Wouldn't be surprised if the low engagement, at least in part, comes down to poor marketing.

[-] PunchingWood@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

I remember it from one of the recent game conferences, but basically only because of the actress that played in the Witcher show too. Pretty much forgot about it immediately.

[-] Renacles@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

The article honestly reads like they are glad the game failed.

I haven't played it but, from reviews, it seems to be a pretty decent AA game with poor marketing.

[-] simple@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago

The article is tongue in cheek, but I'm not sure where you're getting "pretty decent AA game" from. It got scathing reviews and has a worse average score than Forespoken. It's currently mostly negative on Steam so from what it sounds, it seems like a bad game that got zero advertisements because the studio gave up on it.

[-] sgnl@midwest.social 2 points 6 hours ago

Forespokens hatred train was beyond-the-pale ridiculous. If every game was judged / brigaded as harshly as Forspoken was, the AAA game industry would collapse.

And honestly, Forspoken was a really fun game if you focused on what you were doing 99% of the time, which was traversal and combat. The story, quest design and characters were lackluster, but it wasn't nearly as horrible as people made it out to be.

People robbed themselves.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 4 points 5 hours ago

I had Forspoken on my wishlist for quite a while, as I wanted to form my own opinion on it. Then I tried the demo they released and removed the game shortly after. The combat and travel was so boring, clunky and badly over the top (like a Saiya-jin powering up for 30 minutes to release a wet fart), which just piled on top of the rest of its "mediocrity", which I feel is still generous. The story and characters were just not interesting, nothing really hooked me, which is odd since the trailer and idea of it sounded like it would be completely up my ally. That being said, the amount of woke ragebait posts I've seen were definitely unwarranted and clearly caused by the main protagonist.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

"Scathing" feels like too strong of a word for this game or Forspoken's reviews. The majority of them seem to be right around that 7/10 range, and even the 5s share similar language more often than not.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
24 points (83.3% liked)

Games

32191 readers
1040 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS