49

The king’s visit, his first to an overseas realm as sovereign, comes amid revived debate over whether Australia should cut ties with the royal family and become a republic instead.

King Charles III has expressed "deep love and affection" for Australia, a former part of the British Empire. As he visits the country this weekend, he may find that Australians don't feel quite as much affection for him.

Charles and Queen Camilla arrived Friday evening local time in Sydney, where a tribute on the sails of the city's iconic opera house displayed a four-minute montage of images from previous royal visits.

Charles, 75, is Britain's first reigning monarch to visit Australia in 13 years. His Oct. 18-26 trip to Australia and the Pacific island nation of Samoa marks his first visit to overseas realms since becoming king and his first major foreign trip since his cancer diagnosis.

Australia is one of 14 countries outside Britain where he remains the head of state, a role that is largely symbolic. All of them are members of the Commonwealth, a voluntary group of 56 independent states that were almost all formerly under British rule.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 16 hours ago

King Charles arrives in an Australia with mixed feelings about the monarchy.

Why should the King have mixed emotions?

!titlegore©lemmy.world

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago

Fuck the monarchy, god isn't real and nor is your power

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago

Funny that’s how I feel about all authority figures.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Sorry mate but bezos is the actual ruler

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 15 points 1 day ago

There's no mixed feelings, we liked your mum, we don't like you, that's all.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

Why did you like his mother? Was it her dear love of colonialism or her dear love of her racist husband?

[-] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

Who's "we"? I want all the parasites-in-chief with the idiot hats to fuck off.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

👍👍👍👍🕺

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

They were all in a position if power because came out of the right vagina, fuck em all

[-] Balthazar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

What, in particular, do we not like about Charley?

[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

We generally sided with Diana over here.

To me personally, the Queen had a lot of wisdom in consulting the government from a life of many experiences. Charles seems like a bit of a silver spoon baby. I just don't think the monarchy has any value beyond celebrity gossip.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 16 hours ago

Which is a shit rationale frankly. Dude had an arranged marriage that didn't work out and only got to marry the person he wanted to much later in life.

Given the guy has always been a proponent of environmentalism and sustainable industry I think people should give him a lot more respect as an individual, regardless of what you may think about the institution.

[-] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

"....arrives in an Australia" there are more than one?

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 3 points 20 hours ago

There is one in Europe, next to Germany.

[-] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Yes, but not in matters of space, but time. It speaks to the current state of Australia's view on monarchy.

Well, yeah, there's Western Australia, South Australia

[-] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Sure everyone knows about the east coast, but less talked about is the Republic of Westralia

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
49 points (85.5% liked)

World News

38859 readers
1731 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS