740
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Soooo noone here even read the article? Just see Elon and start shitting everywhere? The company suing X was dealing with Twitter before Elon. There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order they are claiming is all custom made and cant be recouped, "the social media platform had not made any firm purchase order when the server dealer went ahead with its purchases and deliveries."

How about we read an article before we start spewing shit everywhere?

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 13 points 15 hours ago

When you read the article, it also points to another article that goes further into this case.

...in 2014 it contracted with Twitter to provide "unique, custom-designed IT infrastructure products including rack solutions."...

Seems it was already approved in 2014 for such a long-term relationship in writing. It seems that Elon just didn't want to pay for it even though Twitter was contractual bound to pay.

[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Which is the whole point. If they had 1 email, 1 PO, 1 documented proof of agreement, this would never be a fuckin court case. What is more likely, that X is risking liability for the $20M + legal costs in court trying to renege $20M down to $18M? All this suing company has to do, as I stated above, is show one acknowledgment and confirmation between the two parties and its an open and close case.

There was a judge (I'm going off memory from hearing it on the radio a year or so ago) in Canada who held a farmer liable for responding to a text with a thumbs up to a contractor asking if he got the contract he sent the farmer. Farmer went into court with the defense he was acknowledging that he received the text but it wasn't enough to convince beyond reasonable doubt there wasn't an understanding between the two.

If Twitter and Elon were trying to weasel out of paying this company, THEY WOULD BE SUING THEM for some made up breech of contract BS like they're doing to advertisers.

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 0 points 8 hours ago

They have one, the contract signed in 2014. As is mentioned in the quote I shared.

[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Contracted =/= Court approved documentation

Ever heard of a verbal contract? It's a legally binding agreement unless everyone from the contracted party was fired and you don't have any fucking proof of the conversations with people no longer employed by the company you are suing.

So for the third time THE COMPANY SUING DOESNT HAVE THE PROPER DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THERE WAS A PURCHASING AGREEMENT. THATS WHY THEYRE SUING AND NOT GOING FOR A SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Like what the fuck are you even arguing for or against? That this company is going thru this expensive and lengthy court process to get judgment for the money they are owed for shits and giggles?

Here is another article that says they assumed Twitter accepted liability:

The complaint also says that Wiwynn, which makes servers and storage systems for data centers and cloud providers, had amassed $120 million worth of parts to fulfill Twitter's existing orders, under the assumption that Twitter had taken liability for them.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order

You think that companies just slap down 20mil without a contract in place?

[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Hahaha yeah otherwise they wouldn't be trying to sue to recoup losses. It happens all the time in sales. I can't even tell you the amount of times I have told new sales reps, I will not place anticipatory PO's without payment confirmation or full compliance with not just the purchase order's parameters for payment on large orders but also an email or otherwise documented acknowledgment of our sales order confirmation. Especially in any case where:

  1. The sales rep has a PO from customer but no payment confirmation/information OR

  2. If it's an order over, let's say $10,000 OR

  3. If it's the first time customer is purchasing from us and they want to make a blanket order OR

  4. If they're an international customer placing ANY orders over $500, or have seperate countries for billing and shipping address, or they're shipping to a country on our "fuck shipping to these countries" list

All those scenarios happen and happen often. Theyre not 100% of nepharious lost revenue cases but I'd say they make up 80-90% of the shit companies have sitting on a warehouse top shelf. Only getting moved to make room for other stuff.

Any business doing fabrications or custom fuckin anything, also will 100% of the time have a signed drawing or print, payment in full before it's released to production floor, usually a +/- 5% runoff or shorting stipulation for any qty over 1,000-3,000 custom anything, and constant communication through out the entire process.

For this exact very real very common shit storm.

So and so's cnc machine broke down we can only make 1,000 of the 10,000 you ordered.

It was a government contract to redo the electrical work at Governor Cuomo's house, how should I know he was going to be removed from office?

Everything this lawsuit outlines, fuckkn screams new business, 1st large contract. All the need is one email, one purchase order, fuck even just a sales order from Twitter and they wouldn't ever make it close to a court house before the Twitter boardmembers looked at the liability, the legal costs and the very slim liklihood they would come out better than if they paid the $20 million. And anyone who argues that $20 Million is enough to try and skip out on and risk letting it go to court has no fucking idea to the quantifiable difference between $20 million and $8-$20 Billion (what im guessing Twitter is still worth assuming it was about $40B when Elon bought and estimates have it between 50% and 80% the value when it sold. Even at the middle $14B, $20M is only 0.14285714% of $14B. No that's not a mistake the decimal is where it should be lol. Check it by multiplying $14B*0.0014285714

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 15 hours ago

How about we read an article before we start spewing shit everywhere?

Good luck lol. The top comments are almost always people that didn't actually read the article, just the headline. I see it on practically all social media sites, not just Lemmy.

[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

If you've been in IT since '98 you ought to know this isn't a social media site lol. It's a social forum for communities of users with like minded interests. Most daily social media users get weeded by any UI that isn't 1-3 giant app buttons to sign you into everything on every device you ever did and will own.

Lol plus not many people here are absolute fucking psychos like you with your Lemmy profile pic hahaha fuck you are a madman lol.

[-] dan@upvote.au 0 points 9 hours ago

Forums are social media, especially so for sites like Reddit and Lemmy where the subforums are community-created.

Wikipedia:

Social media are interactive technologies that facilitate the creation, sharing and aggregation of content (such as ideas, interests, and other forms of expression) amongst virtual communities and networks.

Merriam-Webster:

forms of electronic communication (such as websites for social networking and microblogging) through which users create online communities to share information, ideas, personal messages, and other content (such as videos)

Britannica:

forms of electronic communication (such as Web sites) through which people create online communities to share information, ideas, personal messages, etc.

[-] 5paceThunder@lemmy.ca 19 points 19 hours ago

Lol, Elon is the new Trump, what a mooch. Take away message, Never do business with these types, you will never get paid.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

Strip "Leon" of his US citizenship, use a court order to take the money from his account and ship his Dork MAGA ass off to Moscow or Johannesburg.

[-] Tire@lemmy.ml 6 points 16 hours ago

Could you imagine how upset Republicans would be if some random Mexican immigrant used $61m of resources and didn’t pay? But if it’s a rich white guy that owes that much they are fine with it.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago
[-] Baggins@feddit.uk 79 points 1 day ago

That's how his Department Of Government Efficiency will save billions.

[-] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 12 points 21 hours ago

Which is what Trump wants, as he also publicly admits he just doesn’t pay bills if he doesn’t feel like it.

Looking forward to all the lawsuits between the two should he lose.

[-] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Seems aligned with Trump's habit of shafting his sub-contractors.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 72 points 1 day ago
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 day ago

Paying bills is for poor people. Rich people don’t need to do that. How would they stay rich?

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 160 points 1 day ago

Never give these rich assholes credit unless there is an airtight contract for payment.

[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Payment up front, in non negotiable bearer bonds.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 148 points 1 day ago

There is no such thing as an airtight contract when dealing with Musk. He simply ignores it until you sue.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 110 points 1 day ago

Same thing as Trump.

Doesn't matter how perfect your contract is, as long as they can afford to fight the lawsuit longer than you you're gonna lose.

You'd think people would learn to not contract with these assholes at all.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago

You just have to work in legal costs to anything you do. Call it an asshole tax

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 day ago

Never give these rich assholes credit ~~unless there is an airtight contract for payment~~.

[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Cash on delivery is extremely rare in the business world, especially when dealing with enterprise customers. While I have no doubt many of Twitter's vendors have recently switched to COD, that is not the norm.

These types of relationships typically work on anywhere from 30 to 90 day terms, depending on the vendor, client, and their history.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago

“Your Honor, the board voted to pay this guy a salary of nearly that amount - per day. If it would please the court, fuck this guy and the board and please make them pay their bills.”

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Different board. That was Tesla, not Twitter.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Your honor, rather than pay his outstanding debts, this shiftless f***wit used 75 million dollars to fund a SuperPAC to bother people at their homes for the benefit of the Trump campaign."

[-] _core@sh.itjust.works 85 points 1 day ago
[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

X/Twitter has its own data centers, this is for physical equipment under X's control. They need to get a judgment (which the article indicates they're working on) before they can do anything. Presumably after months to years of litigation they can then repossess the servers, but then X would probably at the last minute pay the bill.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 21 hours ago

They ship servers to customers, don't think they have access anymore.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago

Didn't he just donate 75 mil towards fascism? But can't pay his bills...

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

They should seize and sell his private jet.

You misspelled "harvest" and "organs".

[-] swab148@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Harvest his private organs? No one wants those.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
740 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58792 readers
3725 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS