40
submitted 18 hours ago by warmaster@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

My old 4790k finally died, and I need to replace both the CPU & MB. I was wondering if there would be any conflict in having an AMD CPU and an Nvidia GPU.

I want to use Bazzite on it. I'm running the same distro on my main rig and I'm very happy with it.

Any suggestions?

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

I don't need the iGPU, my dGPU is a 3080TI.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 hours ago

I’ve been an intel boy since I first started building computers in 2014.

Buy an AMD.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago
[-] NIB@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Either is fine but i strongly recommend going for amd, especially an x3d one, like 7800x3d(if you care about gaming).

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago

I was wondering if there would be any conflict in having an AMD CPU and an Nvidia GPU.

No.

[-] nyan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

The GPU doesn't care about the CPU, or vice-versa. AMD is probably better value for money right now if you're intending to replace both CPU and mobo, but Intel will work.

The reason you don't see AMD CPU + nVidia GPU in premade machines these days has to do with corporate contracts, not interoperability. Before AMD bought out ATI, it wasn't an uncommon combination.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

Nah, anything will work fine.

Just a quick question, are you sure it’s the cpu that died? Those ivy bridge (?) chips really seem to last. I’d be surprised if it was the cpu and not the motherboard or power supply of something.

You have one of the nicer fourth gen chips. It would probably be worth it to take it to a computer shop or something and have them try to boot it with a good board.

If it’s still kicking, those motherboards are cheap as heck. The ddr3 is cheap too.

No reason not to keep it around to run a file server/seedbox/Jellyfin server/whatever.

[-] ElectronBadger@lemmy.ml 26 points 14 hours ago
[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago

There is basically 1 reason to go Intel cpu: quicksync video encoding. Amd's is fine but intel's is the gold standard.

Otherwise definitely go amd, it rocks Nvidia perfectly.

[-] warm@kbin.earth 10 points 11 hours ago

With AMD supporting their sockets for long periods of time, there's -1 reasons to buy Intel.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Basically.

I like the E and p cores, mostly because I used to do a lot of core architecture for supercomputer chips and this was one of my ideas I wanted to implement, fully heterogenous cores with Linux support for scheduling.

But no, there's no reason to pick Intel, I only got it because it was cheap, and I don't use it for gaming.

[-] lengau@midwest.social 3 points 9 hours ago

I don't have a good comparison for this since my Intel CPUs are from 2014 or earlier, but I was thoroughly impressed with how well my new AMD laptop did video encoding (compared to the only-as-expected bumps in performance otherwise). Do you have examples of how much better QuickSync is than VCN?

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

So VCN has caught up some, but QS is still faster, generally has better support and better codecs before VCN. Also has combinations, vainfo gives me something like 20 encoders on intel, 8 on amd, mostly stuff like 444 for each variant of hevc, etc. Also my 7600xt was more picky with which settings it would take, the intel block seems fairly comfortable with more.

My Xe has AV1 encode (at ludicrous speeds, I get 30x sometimes, it changed my flow entirely, I stream av1 only now), it's had hevc well earlier than amd, and overall it's usually a good bit faster (an intel igpu will usually encode faster than an amd dgpu).

Also quality has been reviewed to be better, feel free to google that, it's apparently pretty marginal to human observers.

But like I said, the difference is nowhere like it was, AMD is catching up, software is coming together so vaapi covers most cases without complaint.

There's no reason to consider the difference between them unless encoding is your primary focus, and you're trying to use very modern codecs.

[-] gray@pawb.social 50 points 18 hours ago

CPU is pretty much irrelevant to GPU choice.

Personally I wouldn’t buy any recent intel CPU with the dishonesty and major flaws in their products as of late, but that’s up to you to decide - AMD’s most recent CPUs haven’t been amazing either, but don’t have hardware flaws at least.

[-] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 9 points 13 hours ago

correct me if I'm wrong, but the performance issues in the new AMD chips were microsofts fault and they work fine on linux.

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

As others said, both work just fine with any GPU and Intel had serious issues lately with crashes. I'd say go with AMD unless you want higher power usage as Intel chips fare worse when it comes to perf/watt metrics. That said Intel CPUs might have an advantage at single threaded loads, but again, at much higher power use. AMD also tends to keep CPU sockets for longer thus less motherboard changes are required if you upgrade the CPU. You might also consider reading reviews on serious technical websites as it might give you inside into what performance and prices to expect.

Update: On more (implicitly expressed consequence) - due to Intel's much higher power requirements, they are more difficult to cool down - more expensive (air) coolers and quite possibly water cooling required.

[-] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Any Linux distribution should work on AMD CPUs, well, Debian based distros can sometimes have issues with particularly new hardware due to the long time between releases. But bazzite is fedora based so you should be fine with anything.

Nvidia GPUs work just fine with AMD CPUs.

Realistically the question is how high end of a CPU do you want, the mid to high end range AMD CPUs tend to be cheaper than their intel equivalents, but the highest end intel chips edge out the highest end AMD chips right now. Realistically, that won’t matter unless you are doing something super CPU intensive and just want the most power possible for your machine.

AMD CPUs also have better integrated graphics, not super important if you have a dedicated GPU, but, there are times when having a second somewhat capable graphics processor could be useful.

[-] dan@upvote.au 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

On Linux, AMD GPUs work significantly better than Nvidia ones. If you have a choice, choose an AMD. Nvidia is mostly fine though. Even Wayland works well on Nvidia now (after the 560 driver release).

Sometimes you'll hit issues with memory management if you have <=8GB VRAM, since the Nvidia driver doesn't support swapping infrequently accessed parts of VRAM into regular system RAM, like it does on Windows and like AMD does on both Windows and Linux. It's a long-standing issue.

You may also need to manually reinstall the driver after kernel updates. In theory, it's improving as Nvidia are moving most of the driver logic into the firmware, and making the driver thinner with the new open-source out-of-tree driver (https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules).

For CPU, I'd definitely go with AMD instead of Intel. Intel aren't having such a good time at the moment.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

You may also need to manually reinstall the driver after kernel updates.

As with any module installed outside the kernel. If you install it via your package manager is should setup dkms to handle that for you.

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 3 hours ago

Doesn't always work, at least on Fedora. On Fedora, it builds the kernel after the package is installed (so you need to wait 5-10 mins before rebooting) and I guess it doesn't work properly sometimes. I've had it happen twice in a few months. It does work properly sometimes though.

[-] fhein@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

On Linux, AMD GPUs work significantly better than Nvidia ones. If you have a choice, choose an AMD

Unless you're interested in AI stuff, then Nvidia is still the best choice. Some libraries are HW accelerated on AMD, and hopefully more will work in the future.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

Even Wayland works well on Nvidia now

Damn lies. Nvidia works like shit on Wayland and newer kernels.

[-] dan@upvote.au 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Working fine for me on Fedora 40 with a 6.12 kernel. You need to ensure your desktop environment is modern and supports explicit sync. KDE added support in Plasma 6.1, so Plasma 6.1 and Nvidia driver 560 or above should have no issues. I don't use GNOME but they added support in 46.1 as far as I know.

One of my favourite underrated things about Wayland is that I could finally disable pasting when clicking the mousewheel. That's so ingrained into XFree86/X11 that it's impossible to disable.
(disabling it only affects apps that use Wayland)

[-] Penta@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

On Arch+KDE Plasma it's nearly perfect for me with a RTX 3070

[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It's actually working mostly fine me now with KDE 6.2.1, kernel 6.11.3, and nvidia 5.60.something. I get janky scrolling in firefox but apart from that it's been fine.

[-] dan@upvote.au 3 points 12 hours ago

I found that Firefox scrolling was janky even with X11 when using a mouse. You can turn off smooth scrolling in the options, and turn off kinetic scrolling in about:config (apz.gtk.kinetic_scroll.enabled).

[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago

Kinetic scrolling off and smooth scrolling on is so much better. Thanks for the hint.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

47782 readers
782 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS