1344
submitted 2 months ago by sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

You will go straight to jail 😡😡😡

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 30p87@feddit.org 141 points 2 months ago

12ft.io almost never works for me tbh.

Also, appending before something is called prepending, similar to how a prefix after something is a suffix.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 71 points 2 months ago

Archive.is is definitely not an alternative that people should use in this situation

[-] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nor archive.ph, which appears to be the same site? Idk how that works. Definitely not a site anyone should go to, though.

[-] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago

Nor archive.md nor archive.today, which appear to be run by the same rogue actors and serve the same content as archive.is and archive.ph. Beware.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 20 points 2 months ago

I'd like to prepend that this dude is correct.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago
[-] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I got my prependix taken out as a kid due to an infection.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

Yup. They went full OG AdBlock and got WaPo and other major publications to prevent them from working.

You can mimic what they did by adding the Google Crawler user agent to your browser but I just use archive.is

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 89 points 2 months ago

Definitely don't use uBlock Origin's zapper mode to get rid of elements on the page that are blocking your view.

[-] janNatan@lemmy.ml 36 points 2 months ago

Disabling JavaScript through ublock origin also does the same (horrible) thing, frequently.

[-] Furball@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

I’ve used ublock for years and only recently discovered the zapper and it’s my new favorite thing on the internet

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I often forget YouTube shorts are a thing because i zapped them away.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

cocks the element zapper Say hello to my little friend!

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have been using inspect element to manually remove ads and other annoying things

Thanks for reminding me that i can just use ublock origin!

[-] don@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

^ This person adblocks

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 55 points 2 months ago

And God forbid if someone uses archiving sites like archive.is!

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Truly awful. How will the news megacorp get its money? You wouldn't steal the information required for you to be aware of world events? Right?

[-] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

<please sign up for £2.99/month to read cRazi_man's comment and receive an invite to the Discord channel>

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Metostopholes@midwest.social 47 points 2 months ago

Back during prohibition in the US, there was a product called Vine-Glo that was a brick of grape concentrate. It came with a warning: "After dissolving the brick in a gallon of water, do not place the liquid in a jug away in the cupboard for twenty days, because then it would turn into wine."

[-] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 months ago

Doesn't NYT cut off most of the article now? I used to just be able to disable JS but that didn't work anymore last I checked.

[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I use this extension and it lets me bypass pretty much every paywall including NYT's

[-] hunt4peas@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Best extension along with uBlock Origins!

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah the article stub doesn't link to the article. It links to a login flow with the article id. If you go directly to the article you get redirected if you don't have a session.

It's incredibly easy to make an impossible to get around paywall. Porn has done it since the Internet existed.

In this very particular situation I'm glad most companies are lazy and stupid.

I don't particularly care if a company does pay only content. I think its legitimately ok. I hate companies that don't make you pay enough for the service to cover their costs thus leading to complete enshitifaction.

[-] ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

I thought the issue was they wanted search engines to be able to see the content, but not non paying viewers? Hence slightly shitty paywalls.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 27 points 2 months ago

I just hope nobody clicks the reader view button in the top right, it would be just terrible if they got an ad free, paywall free version of the site

[-] TedZanzibar@feddit.uk 6 points 2 months ago

I do that a lot on my phone but keep forgetting it's a thing on desktop for some reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

"Append...before", AKA "prepend"!

[-] abbenm@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wow, I feel like the most upvoted solutions here don't work, and meanwhile some obvious and widely known alternatives are being completely overlooked.

❌ Inspect Element - many modern sites don't even include the full article in the paywalled html, so this wouldn't work. Also sitting there and mousing over elements and deleting them one by one, is tedious, it's easy to accidentally delete an element that encloses the content you intended to keep, or to drive yourself crazy trying to figure out how elements are nested.

❌ Ublock Zapper - a similar to the above, won't work on stub articles, and just janky because you're manually zapping things

❌ Disabled JavaScript - Similar to the above, same problem because many articles are stubs anyway. And the HTML layers that block your view don't have to be done with JavaScript.

❌ Rapid copy and paste of the article to notepad or rapidly printing the screen - similar problem to the above, lots of places just post the stub of an article, and besides nobody should live their life this way rapidly trying to print screen or copy everything. If you're trying to do a quick copy you're going to grab all kinds of gobbledygunk from the page and probably have to manually filter it out.

❌ Reader Mode - Your browsers reader mode will be hit and miss because, again, many sites post stub articles, and it's possible the pay wall stuff will just get formatted into the reader mode along with an incomplete article.

✅ Archive.is - works!

✅ Pocket and Instapaper - amazingly, nobody has mentioned these even though they're probably the longest running (dating back to 2007-2008), possibly most widely known, and most consistent solutions that still work to this day. They keep their own local caches of articles, so it's not depending on the full content being visible on the page.

✅ Other dedicated extensions - Dedicated browser extensions seem to work, but be careful what you're signing yourself up for.

🤷‍♀️ Brave - It works, but, it's a Chromium supported browser, so ultimately Google controls the destiny and can drive Chromium to incorporate fundamental frameworks supporting DRM and pushing their preferred web standards.

[-] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

12ft hardly works for anything for me anymore deeper-sadness

[-] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

Yeah, unfortunately 12ft.io didn't keep up with the paywall arms race. It's too bad because it was one of those things that a lot of people knew about, many of whom may now just give up when it doesn't work even though there are other options out there.

As one example, there's now also the 13ft ladder: https://github.com/wasi-master/13ft It's like 12ft but self hosted. Sounds really good but I can't vouch for it yet.

I mostly would just archive a paywallrd page with archive.is (aka archive.today, archive.ph, etc.) and that worked great and also helped take traffic away from asshole sites that paywall content. Unfortunately, archive started requiring a cloud flare captcha when archiving a page. This is a deal breaker for me since captcha totally deanonymizes you and is used for tracking purposes and even to train AI. So it defeats a good chunk of the purpose of using an archive site.

Still, there's a good chance that someone else already archived the page you want to see, so putting the url in archive.is search can be enough to bypass the paywall.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

I always break the ctrl key right off my keyboard when I get a new computer so I don't accidentally do this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

Archive.ph >12ft.io

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

not NOT use firefox' reading mode.

[-] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

Firefox has a button that shows up in the url that kind of turns the webpage into an e-book-esque view that pops up for most articles (especially Pay Wall)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

DO NOT DISABLE JAVASCRIPT USING AN EXTENSIONS BECAUSE THAT WILL MAKE TRACKING STOP WORKING AND BYPASS PAYWALLS.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] trespasser69@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thank you so much! I already did it! (Smash Ctrl+P as fast as possible)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Absolutely do not inspect elements and start deleting stuff! Leave them alone!

[-] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

If a website sends all the data of an article to you, it's yours. They can't take it away. There's no basis to make the argument anything is owed to the website at that point.

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Many sites don't work like that and don't even load the content from the server before the paywall check.

But I have a trick that work 100% of the time. Just don't read those sites.

I get that journalism and entertainment magazines have workers and need to be paid BUT:

They were getting paid when I could pay a cheap physical newspaper if I want to read it and usually had those for free anyway. As you'll get newspapers on most public places and one single newspaper would serve a whole family. In my house we didn't really paid more than 4€ a month and got physical things that you could just keep. Now with digital distribution you own nothing and it is far more expensive. So... No. Also they get a ton of public money through institutional advertisement, so I'm already basically paying for them without getting access to their content.

So unless they are willing to change their model I'll just refuse to read them. I'm happier without their clickbaits anyway.

[-] abbenm@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

So unless they are willing to change their model I’ll just refuse to live.

Wait what

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

And never, EVER disable JavaScript on that website and reload the page! Not even if your Ad blocker lets you selectively do it.

[-] tilefan@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

my browser always asks if I want the simplified view which always bypasses the paywall

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago

I just use Bypass Paywalls Clean, or failing that, archive.vn.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
1344 points (99.3% liked)

Memes

45902 readers
1354 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS