351
submitted 18 hours ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 13 points 7 hours ago
[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 26 points 11 hours ago

Third party campaigning is BS. All campaigning should be done by the candidate and all donations should go through their campaign. All donors should be public or the list should be available to the government for auditing. Companies aren't people, they don't have rights from the Constitution, they shouldn't be allowed to campaign or contribute.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago

On one hand this is obvious, on the other hand when I mentioned to my friends that rising inequality leads to a rise in fascism they looked at me like I was an idiot, so the more info is out there the better.

[-] TingoTenga@lemmy.world 40 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Not only governance suffers.

Entertain me for a moment. Imagine a utopia in which you don’t need to distrust technology or guard yourself against the companies that control it. No data harvesting or sharing; your privacy, likes and preferences safe and your own. No schemes to come up with algorithms that enrage you and dominate your attention. Imagine that you could trust LLMs to be trained with only the best, curated sources and where their operation is completely open and transparent. Imagine how we would express ourselves through our tech and through social media. Technology would become deeply, deeply personal, benign, helpful and at the service of humankind... as it should be.

The idea is so crazy that it is borderline unthinkable, right?

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

We're just living in 1984.

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Nah that's was like 40 years ago now /s

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

Me: "DUUUUUHHHHHH!!!!!!!!"

Seriously. How many centuries has this been basic fucking common sense???!!!

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)
[-] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 18 hours ago

I’m going wait for the follow up: showing how CEOs don’t prioritize human welfare over profits

[-] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago

That's unironically a very interesting topic. There was actually a landmark court case which insisted that a CEO must prioritize profits over human welfare.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 14 hours ago

That very page says it's not a must.

[-] bastionntb@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago

Where's that Shockface emoji when I need it?!

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Shock face? You mean like when you get tazered by the police? As you do, in the modern day....

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev -3 points 17 hours ago

What's the point of this book? It's nothing new, and would never change anything about the situation.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Research and organized information on a topic, however obvious it might be, is an important step towards policy changes. We also see those changes from time to time, for example some recent EU decisions

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 13 points 15 hours ago

This situation has come to be, through the ignorance and inaction of ordinary people. Your attitude is part of the problem.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
351 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

58818 readers
4589 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS