386

Stacey Williams says the ex-president, whose spokesperson denied the allegations, touched her in an unwanted sexual way in 1993, after Epstein introduced them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] don@lemm.ee 61 points 2 months ago

He sexually assaulted you. Call it what it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Plus he rapes. So. It’s a rich tapestry of evil.

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wish they’d interviewed her months ago.

All the MAGgots are going to question the “timing“ of this.

[-] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

They'd say the same thing if they interviewed her 3 years ago.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But at least early voting wouldn't have started and maybe they could have shaved off a few people who have now already voted for Trump.

Edit: Sorry. Reading back, this was more callous than I meant it to sound. I was just speaking in the abstract and did not make that at all clear. She has the right to come forward whenever she feels ready. Or never if she never felt ready.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

Maybe look back harder yet, damn. It’s obvious you’re 100% ready to cheer the political effects of this insofar as they’re convenient for your side. If it’s not obvious to you, or you think it’s some fluke utterance that doesn’t actually reflect your position on this, I encourage you to look harder and how and whether you’re willing to use victim advocacy as cover for your politics.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You might look at literally every other comment I have made in this thread where I have said that it's up to her to come forward and politics are irrelevant.

Or my edit to this post where I said that I was speaking in the abstract and not specifically about her.

If you want to get mad at people, there are people literally berating her in this thread.

I mean there's someone slightly below my comment saying the timing is suspicious. You didn't bother replying to that comment despite them not saying they were speaking in the abstract.

One wonders why.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

It won't make a different for those dickheads, they've already made it clear they're more than comfortable supporting a rapist.

Hopefully a few of the more sane ones will take this on board though.

[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 3 points 2 months ago

Unfortunately that's not as bad as being "a socialist" in their eyes.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

This is IMPOSSIBLE because Trump and Epstein WERENT friends even though there's Video and Interview Footage of them being the Bestest of Friends until Jeffrey Epstein bought a Bigger Mansion then Trump!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Epstein likes to tell people that he’s a loner, a man who’s never touched alcohol or drugs, and one whose nightlife is far from energetic. And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges. “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

https://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Evangelists..it's what God wanted. God wanted Trump to rape you so as to bring pleasure to an otherwise depressed and sad person. Luckily you can along as a usable thing for him to feel better. Anyway, this is great. He will need some more of you next Wednesday at 7pm so be available. Hey Man! Amen! And so is the word of the book of Trump and his trumpets.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Well, uh, the bible isn't really that opposed to rape. You just have to pay the family of the woman the bride price. As long as you've got the money, it's all good.

And no, that's not a joke. An unmarried man that rapes an unmarried woman has essentially committed a civil infraction under the book of the law. OTOH, a woman that commits adultery should be stoned to death, and a man that rapes a married woman is also put to death. Because according to the bible, women are property.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

At Costco 12 A.D. "hello, I would like there two women in my cart"...."Sir this one, did you get it from the unmarried isle?"...."yes. That one is for humpin. The other looks good for chores around the house, she's from the married isle" ...."just remember, thou shalt not hump from the married isle!"...."understoodeth!"

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
386 points (98.7% liked)

News

23649 readers
2534 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS