623
Ladies, divorce your Republican husband while you still can.
Based and actually good advice
From a hotel in another city or a distant but good friend's place. Avoid the black eyes please.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Ah, but republican men are pushing for laws to make it difficult or even illegal to divorce them without permission.
That's the joke
It’s not a joke, it’s deadly serious.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
See, now if a billionaire would just finance divorce lawyers for this, then I might have a second thing on my list of things that billionaires are good for.
I was about to ask you what the first thing was.
Then my stomach rumbled.
load more comments
(1 replies)
They're preparing to strip women from voting, like in the good ol' times.
We're not going to let that happen. I refuse to go backwards.
I refuse to go backward too, but they overuled Roe, which my aunties told me would NEVER happen. So just not going back isn't enough. We have to move forward.
Well if early indicators are correct, not only will Kamala win, it's possible to retake congress.
To state the obvious... Go Vote, bring your friends, every vote counts. Especially when it comes to down ballot.
Well if early indicators are correct, not only will Kamala win, it’s possible to retake congress.
Don't do that. Don't give me that kind of hope.
load more comments
(7 replies)
It would be the sweetest nectar if a woman beat that misogynistic, rapey carnival barker.
A black woman.
One of my favorite anti-Trump signs said, "God kept Trump alive so he could lose to a black woman."
Early voting is not an accurate prediction of the results of the whole electorate. Very different demographics.
load more comments
(4 replies)
We already have, babe. Bodily autonomy for us is no longer a guarantee.
Already happened /s
https://theonion.com/new-indiana-law-requires-women-voters-to-show-husbands-id/
So I remember hearing in HS US history class that one of the arguments against women's suffrage 100-odd years ago is that married men would now have 2 votes instead of one. This would disadvantage them against bachelors or widowers, who would of course not be able to dictate their nonexistent wives' votes. Unmarried men would only have the one vote, which didn't seem fair.
I guess the idea is not a new worry. It just seems like the fretting has reversed its polarity.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The fact that they're still married to these assholes is beyond me at this point.
I hope that the trend that young people have of not wanting to fuck Republicans hold because seriously, stop fucking Republicans by stop fucking Republicans.
You get into these things when you’re younger and it’s very hard to get out again later.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I wouldn't say don't fuck republicans, but do not marry one without a prenup because there is like a 90% chance they'll go insane because they saw non-white bandaids on a shelf or something
load more comments
(1 replies)
Goddammit, men. Why do you have to always make us all look bad?
Damned Scot's! They ruined Scotland!
Like Republicans and Democrats
Or Republicans and Blacks
Or Republicans and Mexicans
Or Republicans and Muslims
Or Republicans and Immigrants
Or Republicans and Atheists
Or Republicans and Gays
Or Republicans and Trans
Or Republicans and Women
Or Republicans and Single Women
Or Republicans and Cat owners
Or Republicans and people Not Republican Enough!
load more comments
(1 replies)
If they’re scared to tell you they don’t like Donald trump, maybe you should reevaluate how you treat your wife and family. Jesus Christ
bro, people like us, we see our wives as actual people. it's just not like that for them.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I have a suggestion for the "men" who are mad that their wives now have agency
As much of a controversial term as it can be, this is why we need Feminism, with a capital F. Go wives! Do what you know you must! Do not let your husbands control you! Never go back!
Feminism is only controversial to reactionaries.
Everyone else thinks women should be equal members of society.
Wave that feminism flag!
load more comments
(2 replies)
I saw a man push his wheelchair bound wife up to the voting booth, then he pressed the buttons for her, then pushed her out of the way and entered his votes. The whole time the poll workers were just letting it happen.
maga "men"
I don't even think it works in ironic quotations. No man with any true virtue, decency, civility, and honor wants to rob women of their own agency. The concept makes me fucking sick to the core of my being. It is morally reprehensible, and unforgivable. It honestly gets me enraged.
I have lived through reagan, bush, clinton, bush ii, obama, trump and biden...i am frightened for the first time since Nighthorse-Campbell changed affiliation...are we ready to go through this again?
Anyone who lived through 9/11 and didn't feel particularly frightened about what would happen next simply wasn't paying attention
I was worried it might cause anti-foreigner hate that would snowball into the US becoming like Nazi Germany.
Thank goodness THAT didn't happen!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Let's hope!
Don't let crazy stick its dick in you.
They are. Go find the others and be with them. Say, the South Pole?
Why would this be Happening if MAGA was Pro Women like they say?
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
623 points (98.7% liked)
politics
19248 readers
3019 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS