256
submitted 1 month ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 140 points 1 month ago
[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago

I can’t believe they used this as a pro for their distro…

[-] dRLY@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

I am currently only on Linux on my Steam Deck and I do have two RPi's (though I don't actively use them) so I don't have personal current knowledge of differences between Snap, Flatpak, and App Image beyond that A: Snap always brings up lots and lots of hate in comments and B: is from Canonical.

But is it possible that they might choose to use Snap for having more program options due to Ubuntu being such a "mainstream" distro? I know lots and lots of programs do release Flatpaks, but are there more of them or does Snap have more? Real question since I am aware of how heated some threads get with folks being really "fuck Snap" or "it is fine." Mostly just curious since I am more and more likely to move my main PC to Linux as my main OS after Windows 10 is dead.

[-] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Snap doesn't just bring lots of hate in comments it also brings a lot of bloat in your system which is a big no in Linux community. Another thing is canonical is going out of their way to force snap. In Ubuntu even if you do apt install it is installing snap packages.

I'm not sure if there are more snap packages than flatpaks or .deb/.rpm but most Linux users are competent enough to either add custom repos or follow simple build instructions to build from source.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org 15 points 1 month ago

It says possibly snap, so we can hope...

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

What is so hated about snaps? I’ll admit I haven’t used Ubuntu since they started using snaps, but I don’t understand the hate about them in the Linux community.

The place to get snaps is proprietary and exclusive.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Oh… yeah I see the issue.

[-] leisesprecher@feddit.org 51 points 1 month ago

I use Karch, btw.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Burn Snap out of there and I'm in.

Edit: looks like they're not putting much towards snaps, it's mostly Flatpak and systemd-sysext. I'm good with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eldain@feddit.nl 25 points 1 month ago

This article is far too hypey. One dude has started this initiative and needs people to work on his concept to get it off the ground. I'm not opposed to a red-hat free immutable system, but this one is so far from maturity this article is selling a first drawing like an almost finished product. Remind me in two years how this went.

[-] justin@lemmy.kde.social 8 points 1 month ago

Harald, the main architect behind it is already running it as his daily driver. Many others (myself included) are already testing it in VMs and on spare hardware with only very minor papercut issues to be resolved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The distro is designed to be a bulletproof, highly user-friendly operating system that showcases the best of KDE technology—a system that KDE can confidently recommend to casual users and hardware manufacturers.

So it looks like there will finally be a distribution that Windows, Mac, and ChromeOS users can jump to and just start using without having to learn much and with a much better and more familiar GUI than GNOME.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Quail4789@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Everybody's bashing snaps but you can literally package drivers as snaps. If you don't think that's cool af I don't know what is.

[-] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 month ago

So you're telling me that if snaps take off and become a standard there's a good chance I'll have to use them just to get my drivers? Now I hate them even more!

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 month ago

No but you see the drivers will be (must be) approved by Canonical which surely makes things better :|

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 9 points 1 month ago

what's the benefit of packaging drivers that way? surely not permission separation

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 month ago

I think gnome is working on the same sort of thing, read here.

I'm glad to see both going for an immutable os with flatpaks. It's so much more user friendly for the average person and if you are more technically inclined distrobox makes it a breeze to use it like a regular linux desktop.

I hope both do well

[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ooo damn that sounds exactly what I'd like to try.

On the other hand I feel like I'm too old for this shit. My system works fine, I understand everything, and things rarely break and never in an unrecoverable way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I thought we all agreed that "immutable" is a confusing term and that we should call it "atomic"

edit: I was wrong

[-] Unquote0270@programming.dev 20 points 1 month ago

What does atomic mean in this sense? That seems more confusing than immutable.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It means a change either applied completely and successfully, or not at all (think "atomic transactions" in databases).

[-] priapus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Atomic in software refers to an operation that cant be interrupted because it happens in one step. This one of the big selling points of atomic or immutable distros. Your system will not be left in a broken state by cancelling an update because updates do not take multiple steps, unlike traditional distros.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I disagree, because they are not the same thing.

Immutable means read only root.

Atomic means that updates are done in a snapshotted manner somehow. It usually means that if an update fails, your system is not in a half working state, but instead will be reverted to the last working state, and that updates are all or nothing.

I create a btrfs snapshot before updates on my Arch Linux system. This is atomic, but not immutable.*

There is also "image based" which distros like ublue (immutable, atomic) are, but Nixos (also immutable and atomic) are not.

*only really before big updates tbh, but I know people do configure snapshits before all updates.

[-] Lemmchen@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago
[-] priapus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Fedora has pushed for the change by rebranding their immutable distros as Fedora Atomic Desktops, and these are likely the most popular immutable distros. Bazzite's homepage also describes the distro as atomic, but never mentions the term immutable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago

Not all. Red Hat started this by naming their immutable distributions with "atomic" (but then not consistently...). Some people agreed, but not everyone.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Maybe they'll fix the sddm custom theming? It's currently broken on all immutables and doesn't allow custom themes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Ingl, this sounds like exactly the thing I want. Immutability aside, this is how I use EndeavourOS right now, but more sophisticated.

I'm sold on it.

[-] petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] that_leaflet@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Makes sense that it includes snap given that KDE officially supports their apps packaged as snaps, unlike Gnome.

If I recall correctly, aren’t they going for an Arch base? I assume they’re going to be enabling AppArmor so that the snap sandboxing is mostly working, except for the patches Canonical have failed to upstream so far.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I use Fedora KDE but this one sounds like exactly what I need. I primarily use Linux for software dev and web browsing and Windows for gaming and Office.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Alright I am installing this

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Ehh to snaps. That would 100% be the first thing of support to drop if I were them. That said it cool to see more immutable distros experimenting, I wonder how much overlap there is the Kalpa since it is btfs based.

Honestly there definitely still seems some good space for innovation in the immutable space before we "figure it out", so the more smart people experimenting the better!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
256 points (97.1% liked)

Linux

48700 readers
2226 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS