45
submitted 1 month ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 12 points 1 month ago

scientists can now download the software code and use the artificial intelligence (AI) tool for non-commercial applications

(emphasis mine)

Which means that this is an open core code, not open source proper due to the non-commercial restriction, unfortunately.

[-] thejevans@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also, just a sidenote, while AlphaFold2 training data is available for download (unsure if AlphaFold3 will follow suit), the OSI recently released its definition for open source AI models, and there is no requirement that the training data needs to also be open for a model to be considered "open source", which is extremely disappointing and will degrade the meaning of open source.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago
[-] KasTasMykolas@river.group.lt 7 points 1 month ago

@yogthos it would seem that it's rather "open" to download the source code and access some data after signing in as a scientist. Far from fully open-source for an AI tool, by most of the definitions.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

unfortunately looks that way

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

31746 readers
133 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS