145

A million users last I checked

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

Maybe those people should have done it when everyone sane did it: when musk bought it.

[-] whithom@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago

It’s hard to convince people to leave their doom scroller. It took some convincing to get me off Reddit. I should have come over here way earlier.

[-] odelik@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago

I'm glad that Bluesky is seeing a boost in user registration and X is loosing users. Great news for the fediverse, even though Bluesky is fediverse-lite.

However, the editor that chose that headline should be fired.

The ambiguous wording and lack of commas for the "of unhappy x users" probably boosts engagement though. So I guess TechCrunch's bottom line gets boosted and they'll get praise instead.

[-] Vipsu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Honestly it's probably better this way as Fediverse is likely ill prepared to host all these people. There's likely still a lot work to be done to make instances more efficient, scaleable, sustainable and easier to moderate.

[-] glowinfly@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hadn't thought about that.. when there was an exodus last year or 2022 I think? Mastodon received a lot of users and mastodon.social temporarily closed sign ups, probably because of this. It's also a lot more convenient and easier switch to BlueSky, official app very Twitter-like web UI also Twitter-like, it certainly provides a more convenient switch to people who just don't to stress on the smallest things, also just create account with a default instance pre-selected (which a lot of those migrating there are confused why usernames contain the instance after the username). Pixelfed does a lot better in those terms comparing to what it aims to be an alternative of (Instagram) than Mastodon does with too many choices most people will be lost even more the people who know very little about tech and don't even know the difference of centralized and decentralized. I've came across this post on Mastodon (from another Lemmy post) which is very concerning though.. but again, these people won't care about that, it's all about convenience for most of them and BlueSky is doing it well.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Yay, keep eff'ing up corp.soc.media. We'll gladly absorb your disgruntled users.

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
145 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS