337
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Female veterans and service members are condemning Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth’s comments opposing women in combat roles, calling them outdated and harmful.

Hegseth claimed women in combat complicate military effectiveness, despite decades of evidence proving their competence, including service in Iraq and Afghanistan, where over 300,000 women served, with 179 killed and over 1,000 wounded.

Critics, including Sen. Tammy Duckworth, a Purple Heart recipient, argue Hegseth’s views ignore the realities of modern warfare.

His nomination has sparked backlash, further amplified by past allegations of sexual misconduct.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chozo@fedia.io 95 points 1 month ago

You know what? I'm starting to think that a nazi might not be a good pick for Defense Secretary if he can't respect women.

[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I guess I'm confused but your need to qualify that statement at all.

Maybe we went wrong somewhere...

[-] JoShmoe@ani.social -3 points 1 month ago

I’m starting to think that nazi is short for bad.

[-] SirW00talot@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Naw this guy has literal white supremacist and Nazi tattoos

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

while you're busy debating whether these are Nazis or just sparkling fascists you'll end up in the same spot regardless

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 65 points 1 month ago

If Americans wanted Women to have Rights and Respect they WOULDNT have Voted for a Convicted Rapist!

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

I thought you were supposed to be satirical. This is just a fact.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

A fact apart from the millions and millions of women who did not vote for him.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

53% of white women voted for Trump in 2024.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Hey! He might be a rapist, but he is "their rapist" so it is okay.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

That's nearly a dead even split and it was mostly not the younger ones who voted for him.

[-] whithom@discuss.online 63 points 1 month ago

Sexual misconduct is a prerequisite for the trump administration

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

to be fair the army has historically been quite fond of it as well

[-] whithom@discuss.online -3 points 1 month ago

I thought that was the navy 😉😘⚓️💦👅

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago

You misspelled requirement

[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

What do you think a prerequisite is? If you're going to be pedantic, at least be right...

[-] whithom@discuss.online 2 points 1 month ago

Hah! Beat me to the pedantry! I love that word.

[-] eatthecake@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Most people agree with him and nothing will ever change their minds. We are not living in a world of evidence based beliefs.

[-] homura1650@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

So. The secretary of defense is not an elected position. Most people in the country don't even know who currently holds the role.

The opinion of those he leads and works with is much more important.

[-] eatthecake@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The opinion of who leads the country and his voters are more important. It's like the west trying to install democracy and progress in afghanistan. The locals aren't having it.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"Most people agree with him"

No they don't: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2013/01/29/broad-support-for-combat-roles-for-women/

"Two-thirds (66%) support allowing women in the military to serve in ground units that engage in close combat, while just 26% are opposed. "

Stop letting these fucktards own the narrative by default, dammit.

[-] don@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago

Sorry, ladies, but you were outvoted by the conservatives by a large margin. You could try confronting them, but it’s far too late now.

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 19 points 1 month ago

Well technically white women voted for this too.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago

Not the young ones.

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago

Trump is throwing out rapid fire unqualified pics to force votes against him in the Senate. This isn’t usual politics. He’s just throwing grenades because he can.

No, he's throwing out horrible picks so that the slightly less horrible picks that come after them seem reasonable.

[-] kryptonidas@lemmings.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nah, he isn’t playing chess, he’s just the pigeon shitting all over the board.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

He isn't playing chess because he's not the one doing the chess playing. He's a puppet. Do you think he came up with any of Project 2025?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

That is my theory too. I don't think people understand how much the Republicans controlling Trump have been planning for this.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

That's exactly what this is. It's easier to loot the country when everything is burning and your corruption isn't the biggest problem.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I saw some bonkers rumor about Trump adjourning cogress allowing him to make recess appointments.

So he throws out shit nominees to force the Senate to not approve someone, looking at you RFK, Trump says he cant work with this Senate and adjourns them. Makes even worse appointmemts and bingo bango we have an american despot.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 7 points 1 month ago

What does he gain from Senate voting against him?

[-] TheFlopster@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Chaos? A distraction from whatever else he's up to that night be worse? Idk.

[-] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Maybe, or open revolt from them to block anything he tries to do after. I'm hoping the gop splits at this point and nothing gets done for 4 years.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago
[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I feel this argument has merit:

That Trump is rewarding loyalty with little consequence to himself and at the same time testing senators to see who will fall in line. That also has the effect of making many fall in line (see Dictatoring for Dummies, P. 14). At the same time he gets to soften up the senate for candidates who are almost as outrageous but will seem reasonable in comparison.

[-] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Do we really expect votes against him? They're always bemoaning how bad he is, followed with falling in line to vote as dictated to them.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That and the fact that he thought it was a good idea to throw an ax at a small target that had people behind. And his white supremacist tattoo. And the dude does not wash his hands after he shits. It'd be a shame if he and RFK Jr got cholera and/or hep C.

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Enjoy what you voted for ladies

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
337 points (98.6% liked)

News

23655 readers
2928 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS