113
"How would you like a world class military and worse everything else?"
Quite the pitch.
For what it's worth, given Canada's past elections, they would likely tip the scales of the electoral college to consistent blue.
That was my thought, if Canada came in as the territories are currently divided it wouldn't be good for conservatives in either the house or the Senate.
Ya If Canada was granted multiple states. Otherwise we would be the northern Puerto Rico with no votes
A better idea
Nah we keep Alaska too.
And probably lose Alberta for a few years. It would be like brexit- let us back in please
Updated for 2024/5:
Jesusland includes Wisconsin, Pennslyvania, Michigan, and Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba.
Illinois, New Mexico and Colorado go to USC, but they're basically in a Lesotho situation.
Yes please
I'll never surrender a single decent person to the god-botherers and rapists.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Give Canada statehood, buy Greenland, colonize Mars, and do all of these things under the leadership of a bunch of television personalities, the budgetary guidance of a guy who overpaid for Twitter by at least 25 billion and immediately devalued it, and the control of a geriatric, senial moron President. And the dude hasn't even gotten back in office yet. The Onion doesn't even stand a chance for the next 4 years.
Twitter wasn't bought for its economic value but as a propaganda machine and it turned out it was very effective.
Let's not pretend the that was his original intention or that any real forethought was put into it at all. It certainly worked out that way, but that doesn't discount the extreme stupidity, bravado and ineptitude that went into the Twitter purchase. It became a useful propaganda machine because of Elon, but that is different than crediting him for doing so intentionally.
Nailed it! Also, didn't the SEC basically force him to buy it after running his mouth off?
Yes. He tried to backpedal his offer.
It may not have been his plan, but given who funded him it’s not exactly a wild conspiracy.
I personally believe, especially due to the buyer and the backers of the purchase, that the entire intent behind the purchase was to destroy it so that the global elite could better control the narrative. The purchase of Twitter, and the going public of Reddit, both occurred when online networking and support for global protest was in full swing. A lot of those protests have been squashed since, with some help from not being able to easily coordinate and share globally as easily anymore. It worked, now that you’ve caught the car you were chasing, what do you do next? The very next step is to subvert it.
So, yeah. I do believe this was the next step after destroying the ability of the common person to network, protest, and allow progressive ideals to grow.
I believe he just wanted to take control of a popular public forum that had been recently banning (largely) conservative voices for things like dangerous covid misinformation, harassment, violent rhetoric/threats, etc. and he both didn't want to become the next victim of the ban hammer and wanted to return those far right voices and conspiracy theorists back to the forefront. He also clearly wanted to control the narrative about himself too.
Hey, Donnie, how about granting DC, who actually want it, statehood first? (We all know why not, they vote the wrong way.)
And Puerto Rico
They have to stop voting against it first.
They already voted to become a state, it's in Congress hands now
load more comments
(1 replies)
I tell you what, we'll trade you Alberta and Saskatchewan, the BEEF, OIL, AND GAS POWERHOUSES OF CANADA for your libcucked latte sipping west coast states California, Oregon, and Washington.
That's three of our best states. California is one of our biggest economies, has most of our tech sector (Washington being another one) and has a good use of solar energy. Oregon is beautiful.
You can just have Texas and Florida. No trade required.
That's three of our best states
load more comments
(1 replies)
And no, we won't take them back.
No way in hell that we are taking Texas and Florida!
No, you keep those two
Can't we just form a new country with British Columbia? The four of us are basically the same cultural region.
You're roughly describing "Cascadia"
I'm well aware. I considered excluding southern California because I'm no fan, but they're not all bad. We can always expel them later if we need to.
That's such an American thing to say lol.
No we are very culturally distinct in subtle but important ways. Expats stick out here more than they think, it isn't just about accent or removing your shoes.
I have lived in all four west coast states, so I'm pretty familiar. Obviously they're not all the same, but there are a lot of similarities in culture compared to states I have lived in on the east coast.
Proving my point, eh
Shame we don't have the housing to support mass immigration from blue states.
Our governors are working hard to wall us off from the fascism.
All of it? One state? Strange suggestion.
But I've been saying that the reason Donnie wanted to buy Greenland was so that Putin could connect Russia to the United States and isolate Canada, at which point, Putin would basically control >75% of land and the entire Arctic ocean.
Wut.
We have Alaska.
Controlled by Putins cum sock puppet
The entire US government is now, so...
That connects us very minimally east to west.
Greenland connects us across Canada northwards, putting Canada in the middle of Putin controlled land
load more comments
(4 replies)
There's a mockumentary about Germany becoming one single canton of Switzerland. Life really does imitate art.
It's called Der grosse Kanton, if anyone's interested.
He’s not even in office yet? Is this even legal?
It's absolutely not. See: Logan act.
Quebec isnt going to be happy
Well considering quite a number 500 000 of French Canadians left for the US, I don't believe it would be an issue... There are still a lot of French Canadians American in the US....
Are we in the Fallout timeline? Gonna annex Canada, and then lose Alaska to China right before the nukes get dropped.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
113 points (94.5% liked)
politics
19244 readers
3742 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS