18
submitted 4 weeks ago by mwguy@infosec.pub to c/politics@lemmy.world

I tried to make an AI summary of the article but it somehow thought that Biden beat Trump in 2024 so I'm throwing that away.

This is part 1 of a ongoing 3 part series looking at the Harris campaign. Mostly based on her campaign management's recent podcast appearance(s) and statistics from the election results.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago

Know what helped to re-elect Trump?

American's inability to responsibly inform and engage themselves in our political affairs.

Talk to an average American. They're clueless. The vast majority couldn't give a factual 2 minute speech regarding their party/candidate preferences without regressing to emotional outbursts not based in fact.

We can keep analyzing what the Democrats did wrong or we can accept that Americans are what's wrong, because they don't care to inform themselves responsibly and are easily influenced by pretty blatant fear-based propaganda.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

Yes. Voter intimidation, fraud, help from foreign entities, lies, and subterfuge.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 weeks ago

Also any attempts to limit those things are met with bad faith "freedom of speech" arguments.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 weeks ago

I don’t disagree but this conclusion doesn’t seem very actionable. What can be done to solve this problem? Is it more useful to try to equip Americans with a better understanding of these issues or simply navigate around their ignorance better?

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Fight propaganda with propaganda. Dems need a “talking point memo” each week and everyone needs to drive home that simple weekly message across all media. They also need to send out direct mail during elections with SIMPLE scary messages. Things like “Trump wants to take away your Medicaid” and “Average grocery bill goes up $65 under Trump”.

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

American's inability to responsibly inform and engage themselves in our political affairs.

I don't agree, I still put the majority of the blame at the feet of the DNC. They wouldn't run on progressive policies, but also refused to compromise with the electorate on anything.

Almost 66 million people voted for Hillary in 2016. Over 81 million voted for Biden in 2020, the campaign where Biden's team worked with Bernie's team to bring some progressive-policy to his platform. Yes, four years of Trump and the pandemic helped that voter turnout, but I'd argue it was more the progressive platform.

And in 2024, just under 75 million voted for Harris, who ran a centrist, status quo campaign, and thought "We're not Trump" was enough to engage voters. Bernie was right, Americans want change, and being promised nothing more than a continuation of the status quo, people stayed home.

And before anyone says "The voters knew the price and their hubris cost all of us, I hope they're happy!" Why couldn't the DNC compromise? Harris lost Michigan by less numbers than protest voted in the primaries, so why couldn't the DNC change course on Gaza? They were the ones telling us the threat that Trump is, they were the ones urging us to give them money to fight (and as soon as they lost, stopped fighting), they were the ones telling us they know best and that they're going to shift right when we were asking them to move left.

I get it, 77 million people voted for Trump, and that is a problem. But, roughly 90 million Americans didn't vote, so instead of pushing the party right and parading around with Cheney in an attempt to win over Republicans, then demanding our vote anyway (I voted Harris, fyi) because "Trump fascist, Harris not fascist", maybe they could try... Popular, progressive policies that will resonate with all Americans? Policies that may actually make those in the "both sides are the same" camp to say, "Y'know what, they're actually not the same!"

It's a crazy thought, but it could work.

[-] buttfarts@lemy.lol 3 points 3 weeks ago

Idiots inhale lies like they're free ice cream and can never be dissuaded from believing in the most insane horseshit.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

The only thing that can change in this equation is the Democrats. A third party won’t happen. Republicans won’t change because they’re winning.

So unless the Democrats figure out how to jangle keys in front of people to get them to pay attention long enough to vote we’re fucked.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. People keep blaming Democrats and Kamala and Biden for all kinds of things, but they are up against a tidal wave of bullshit and dark money and foreign interference.

Yes, we had inflation, but there were all kinds of indicators that things were going well as far as the economy. But if the "liberal media" keeps saying how absolutely terrible everything is, some people fall for that. And they sure did a lot of that, probably to be "objective" and report "both sides", but really to run their horse race, and, most likely, do everything possible to tip things in favor of the qons.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Talk to an average American. They’re clueless.

You're blaming the victims when you should be blaming the indoctrination system, capitalist media, nationalist ideology, etc. These people (including myself) are literally born into a brainwashed cult. Blaming them only reinforces it. We need to break them out of it instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

He's not just trash, he's a degenerate gambler who doesn't even understand gambling as well as he thinks he does.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

"Risk-aversion"? It's cowardice or complicity or both.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

"there was also an unwillingness to ruffle feathers with other progressive constituencies who might have gotten upset by a bolder approach."

"bolder" than the strategy of campaigning with Liz cheney and telling progressives "Im talking"? And losing ground with every single group except college educated whites? She was too nice to progressives and thats why she lost, huh Nate.

Go eff yourself Nate Silver. what an utterly Idiotic analysis. I think we need to be done taking Nate Silver seriously.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world -2 points 4 weeks ago

Pretty sure Tim is not going to like the use of this image, and there will be a takedown request.

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 2 points 4 weeks ago
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world -4 points 4 weeks ago

The banner image from the post/site.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

That "banner image" in the link here comes from the embedded YouTube video in the post. It isn't actually a banner image.

So what, praytell, is Tim Robinson gonna ask him to take down? The fair use of a YouTube link?

You know, sometimes actually clicking on the link and looking at it before you post some dumb shit helps.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

pretty sure no one here cares about that image but you. Are you crowdsourcing meaningless copyright enforcement? Why are you wasting everyones time with this?

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
18 points (71.4% liked)

politics

19260 readers
1967 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS