336
submitted 3 weeks ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 119 points 3 weeks ago

Open letter to executive committees:

That feeling you're feeling right now? The one where you're scared, at every moment of every day, at least a little, sometimes a lot, but never not scared?

Yeah, the people you're scared of feel that from about age five until they die, for all manner of reasons. They know how to go on with that fear inside them. You don't. When - not if, when - shit goes sideways and you've got the resources that people need, they're going to come take that shit from you, and there's not a goddamned thing you'll be able to do about it.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago

It's the same feeling parents of children with cancer feel when you deny their child treatment. The combination of fear and rage. You've had years of getting comfortable with handing out the fear, now you're starting to learn what it means to have the rage come looking for you.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 2 weeks ago

The whole point of insurance is that a bunch of people pay a bit of money so that none of those people have to choose between tragedy and financial ruin. Ideally, it is a 100% socialist contract.

When the insurance company denies a claim, or otherwise stands in the way of someone receiving timely treatment, that contract is broken. It's only a matter of time before someone who has been wronged comes to extract their pound of flesh, and I'm franlky surprised it hasn't happened much sooner.

That's why this incident has generated so much indifference towards someone stalking and shooting someone else on the street in broad daylight. Because all of us have experienced that contract being broken. All of us are owed a pound of flesh, and we're vicariously receiving it.

Running insurance companies (again, insurance is ideally socialist) as capitalist endeavors (profit above everything, funneled to owners) is inherently abusive, and we all instinctively know this.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed.

Shareholders should never be part of the healthcare business.

It shouldn't be a business at all.

[-] Weslee@lemmy.world 80 points 3 weeks ago

Why do companies always forget that web archive exists?

[-] riverSpirit@thelemmy.club 62 points 3 weeks ago

The thing companies are trying to take down?

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 24 points 3 weeks ago

They don't forget it exists, they just haven't quite managed to destroy it yet.

[-] Darkard@lemmy.world 61 points 3 weeks ago

Here ya go. Just a little starter

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What about a deck of cards for healthcare CEOs like we did in the Iraq with the most wanted high ranking officials?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most-wanted_Iraqi_playing_cards

I like this one because anyone arguing this is wrong has to admit the US imperial war machine is far worse.

"As of 2024, all but four of the 52 most wanted have either died or been captured, eleven of whom have been released."

[-] SelfProgrammed@lemmy.world 53 points 3 weeks ago

To me, that's a sign that they know they're guilty.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not convinced that people, yes even the bad ones, wake up, get out of bed, and think to themselves "let's do evil today". Rather, I think people tell themselves lies about how their actions are morally justified for some greater good, or at least remain willfully ignorant (i.e. psychopaths), or just complicit in a rotten system (passive bystanders).

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Sometimes I jump on reddit and it wants me to checkout r/austrian_economics and its basically people doing just that.

[-] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 3 weeks ago

And yet most of them are public companies. Who file annual reports. Which names the top executives. /facepalm

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 24 points 2 weeks ago

And there's Wikipedia, archive.org and the Wall Street Journal. It's not exactly going to stop anyone.

[-] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 48 points 3 weeks ago

So they’re admitting that their companies are just as bad? Interesting.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago
[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

Good. Be afraid mfers. Live in constant fear.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

No way to find out who the CEO of a company is if they do not put it in the "about us" section of their website.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah if it's a publicly traded company doesn't this information need to be public?

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's kind of the definition of publicly traded. You don't get all the employees, but you get to know who is making you money.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 weeks ago

It's OK. Politicalmemes made a list with pictures, names and salaries.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not a legal / financial expert by any means. But I think info about the executives, board, etc., has to be published in things like the securities prospectus for the companies, etc.

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

You wouldn't be scared if you were innocent. Just sayin'.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Archive.org will bring them back if you just gotta know. Yay!

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Do they think we are stupid?

Oh wait... never mind.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
336 points (98.6% liked)

News

23664 readers
3571 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS