395
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IAmLamp@fedia.io 68 points 2 weeks ago

Please come back when you can afford to make a purchase. Your kids are starving. Carl's Jr. believes no child should go hungry. You are an unfit mother. Your children will be placed in the custody of Carl's Jr. Carl's Jr... "Fuck You, I'm Eating."

[-] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago

I'm so sick of this timeline. I can't believe this isn't an Onion article.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 60 points 2 weeks ago

I am getting the feeling that being a women in America is kind of terrible.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

About to be worse.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is so fucked. Wow.

If you don't die due to our abortion laws, we're gonna steal your kid.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 33 points 2 weeks ago

DS9 "Past Tense" is a prescient episode in a lot of ways, but there's one line that I think doesn't get enough attention: it's not that people don't care, but that all the problems they face seem too big to handle.

Having a baby swiped away based on a drug test for drugs the hospital gave you is horrible. Yet, it seems to rate rather low compared to a huge list of other problems we face, and I really don't know how to deal with that.

[-] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 28 points 2 weeks ago

Here we go again more stories about hospitals and CPS services using faulty and/or cheap means of testing to "comply" with regulations at the expense of patient. Why am I not at all surprised. I used to do this testing and when the process is done correctly it works. Here's how it's supposed to be done. First off you get a urine from Mom on admissions BEFORE giving any medication. Then you get the meconium and urine from baby after birth. You screen all three and confirm any positive screen with a more stringent confirmation test. Then you compare the three results to get a full picture of any drug usage that may be going on. Mom's urine will tell you if she's using within the last 3-5 days depending on the drug with the exception of THC which can stick around longer. Meconium gives you a window of drug use that might have occurred from the second trimester and on. It's not great to test it on its own because it's suspectable to faulty specimen collection. (I can't tell you how many times I got a cup of baby shit instead of real meconium. Real meconium looks like plastic, has the consistency of a mallomar, and usually has a mucus plug attached.)Then you test the baby's first urine output to determine if they have active drug in their system now. Use all three results together to interpret the big picture. At NO point do you ever give providers the screen results before confirmation. Hospitals and legal entities should be sued into oblivion for prosecuting innocent people over bad procedure and screening results. This shit irritates me to no end.

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We can also blame the DEA for putting massive amounts of pressure on hospitals and drs for NOT doing these tests, even if circumstances didn't allow, or wasnt a priority(emergency c sections for example)

So the hospital breaks the protocol you laid out for us otherwise the DEA can come in and audit the hospital and if they don't like what they find, like missing drug tests, they can take doctors liscences to practice and drag that hospital through the dirt. It's fucked up how much power they have and how detrimental they've become to healthcare.

My doctor is forced to drug test me because of a medication I take. The last time she did it she apologized and said the DEA was auditing them this month and she had no choice. Those drug tests are like $500 if you don't have insurance, and a lot of private insurances won't cover it. If they won't I have to sign a paper saying I'll pay for it. If I don't do this I don't get life giving medications for a neurological disorder I was born with.

DEA mandated drug tests are unethical and provide very little benefit... if any at all. It just makes every patient feel like a criminal. Let doctors use their best judgment. It's better than the alternative... which is this.

[-] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

Oh I absolutely agree. Gabapentin being one of those "scheduled" and monitored drug about broke me in the lab. Like no one is purposely getting high off of that shit. The Sacklers ruined pain management for everyone and I hope they all burn in hell.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 2 weeks ago

That's incredible. Another headline I never would have imagined on my own.

Way to go, hospital staff. You're doing great. /s

[-] recentSloth43@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

"I've decided having black eye is illegal. Now hold still as i punch you in the eye" -the people making up those same laws probably

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago
[-] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What on earth could ever make anyone think this is ok?

Salinas

Villanueva

oh...

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
395 points (99.7% liked)

News

23655 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS