663
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by bbbhltz@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

An official FBI document dated January 2021, obtained by the American association "Property of People" through the Freedom of Information Act.

This document summarizes the possibilities for legal access to data from nine instant messaging services: iMessage, Line, Signal, Telegram, Threema, Viber, WeChat, WhatsApp and Wickr. For each software, different judicial methods are explored, such as subpoena, search warrant, active collection of communications metadata ("Pen Register") or connection data retention law ("18 USC§2703"). Here, in essence, is the information the FBI says it can retrieve:

  • Apple iMessage: basic subscriber data; in the case of an iPhone user, investigators may be able to get their hands on message content if the user uses iCloud to synchronize iMessage messages or to back up data on their phone.

  • Line: account data (image, username, e-mail address, phone number, Line ID, creation date, usage data, etc.); if the user has not activated end-to-end encryption, investigators can retrieve the texts of exchanges over a seven-day period, but not other data (audio, video, images, location).

  • Signal: date and time of account creation and date of last connection.

  • Telegram: IP address and phone number for investigations into confirmed terrorists, otherwise nothing.

  • Threema: cryptographic fingerprint of phone number and e-mail address, push service tokens if used, public key, account creation date, last connection date.

  • Viber: account data and IP address used to create the account; investigators can also access message history (date, time, source, destination).

  • WeChat: basic data such as name, phone number, e-mail and IP address, but only for non-Chinese users.

  • WhatsApp: the targeted person's basic data, address book and contacts who have the targeted person in their address book; it is possible to collect message metadata in real time ("Pen Register"); message content can be retrieved via iCloud backups.

  • Wickr: Date and time of account creation, types of terminal on which the application is installed, date of last connection, number of messages exchanged, external identifiers associated with the account (e-mail addresses, telephone numbers), avatar image, data linked to adding or deleting.

TL;DR Signal is the messaging system that provides the least information to investigators.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 110 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Takeaways:

  • End-to-end encryption works.
  • The only trustworthy computer is your computer. Don't use cloud storage.
  • The only trustworthy software is open-source software. Proprietary software serves the interests of the proprietor, not the user.

All of this was already well-known, of course, but it's always nice to get confirmation.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 62 points 2 years ago

So basically use signal because they can get the least amount of data.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 29 points 2 years ago

Matrix isn't on the list at all.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

I don’t think the list could have everything

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 9 points 2 years ago

Wasn't heavily used at the time probably.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] erre@feddit.win 15 points 2 years ago

Or Telegram, unless you're a confirmed terrorist.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 17 points 2 years ago

"I'm not a terrorist" - Subpoena DENIED

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 years ago

Terrorist can be a very broad term. In France the government is using anti terrorism laws against ecologist organisation.

They also incarcerated people from another organisation 3 years ago using the same antiterrorism law, they haven't found anything against them so now they are accusing them of using signal for their communication and encryption on their phone and laptop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Melpomene@kbin.social 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thanks for the great summary! Also a good reminder to people that storing your backups on a "as secure as we decide it is" service like iCloud isn't ideal if you want to protect your data from government snooping.

Edited to remove pre-coffee salt and lack of nuance.

[-] SemioticStandard@beehaw.org 39 points 2 years ago

This perspective lacks nuance.

a service like iCloud is a bad idea if you care about your privacy

Like all security and privacy measures, you have to consider your threat profile. From whom are you trying to maintain privacy from? If it’s other people or companies, then using a service like this is perfectly okay. If you’re worried about state actors or governmental agencies coming after you, then you have a very different set of requirements and considerations than most people, and you should plan accordingly.

But saying that services like this aren’t for people who care about their privacy is a little disingenuous. As with all things, it’s a matter of degrees.

[-] Melpomene@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago

Fair point... and I'll edit the comment to reflect that. Thanks for catching the lack of nuance... guess fasting for 24 hours has me both tired and salty.

[-] mobyduck648@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

I feel a lot of people get ‘dragnet surveillance against everyone on the internet’ mixed up with ‘being actively under pressure from a state-level actor’. If the likes of MI5 or the FBI were genuinely after someone they’d need a lot more than an encrypted messaging service and a VPN to avoid them.

I like my current setup but I’m under no illusion it would do much at all against the ‘electric cattle prod and water-boarding’ school of decryption exploits.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] xray@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

Generally agree, but this document is also from January 2021. Apple brought E2EE to almost all aspects of iCloud in December 2022 including iCloud Backups. It's opt-in, so theoretically, if you were having a conversation with a contact who didn't opt-in to E2EE but backed up their iMessages to iCloud, the government could still access your messages via that contact even if you opted-in to E2EE, but still.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] potsnpans@beehaw.org 42 points 2 years ago
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Also remember this is useless without complementary security measures:

  1. Encrypt the storage on any device where these are installed (including your desktop/laptop drives if you install e.g. the desktop version of Signal).
  2. Lock your devices with pin or password, and store that pin/password only in your head (there's no such thing as telepathy at this point in time so they can't physically force it out of you, unlike biometric data like your fingerprints).

If you are relying on "Legally they're not allowed to," instead of, "They simply can't, despite all they might try," then you're not doing it right.

[-] Sentinian@lemmy.one 25 points 2 years ago

Well this made me download signal, thanks fbi

[-] ozoned@beehaw.org 23 points 2 years ago

No mention of Matrix. Wonder if it's not on their radar, or they have nothing, or just wasn't important to put it on there?

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 21 points 2 years ago

iMessage is now fully secure like Signal and Telegram, if you’ve enabled advanced data protection in your Apple ID. This also protects your photos and other personal information from snooping and data breaches. Apple users should turn on this great feature in Settings -> iCloud.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Even if you turn that on, they're still scanning your content for, supposedly, child porn.

I very seriously doubt the their scanning is actually limited to child porn. And even if it is, if you take nude selfies and some AI thinks you look like a child, then some Apple employee will have to look at them to confirm…

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

They cancelled CSAM scanning as of last year. It never actually rolled out, due to backlash.

https://www.wired.com/story/apple-photo-scanning-csam-communication-safety-messages/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NotSteve_@beehaw.org 21 points 2 years ago

I'm actually surprised they can't get more WhatsApp data considering it's Facebook. I know WhatsApp's thing is encryption but... It's Facebook

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sculd@beehaw.org 19 points 2 years ago

As expected, Signal is still the best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vraylle@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's like a promotional flier for Signal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

This makes me suspicious though, surely if they've declassified this that means they want people to see it, so isn't there a very real chance it's intentionally misleading?

[-] bbbhltz@beehaw.org 22 points 2 years ago

I think that today, in 2023, some of the information here is outdated. We know that different messages can be intercepted and decrypted. It is labelled as unclassified, which I think might be different from declassified?

[-] SenorBolsa@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Correct it's labeled as unclassed sensitive info for law enforcement. That just means "don't share this shit on facebook if you want to keep your job"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ozoned@beehaw.org 14 points 2 years ago

Is there a link to this article or doc or anything?

[-] ozoned@beehaw.org 34 points 2 years ago

Found a PCMag article indicating this:

https://www.pcmag.com/news/fbi-document-shows-how-popular-secure-messaging-apps-stack-up

So OP did indicate it's from 2021. That's a long time though in tech. So while interesting to see, who knows if this has changed in 2+ years.

[-] arcticpiecitylights@beehaw.org 13 points 2 years ago

I'm curious what/if any info can be retrieved from Matrix servers?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Napain@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

i love how telegram isn't even encrypted or anything but they just ghost the authorities

[-] __forward__@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

To clarify because this is always a point of confusion whenever the topic comes up. Telegram is, of course, transport encrypted. Someone listening on the wire cannot read your data. It is not end-to-end encrypted, meaning Telegram can always read your messages and can, in principle, give anyone access.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Schedar@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago

Wonder what a difference it now makes with the iCloud “advanced Data protection” that provides end to end encryption for iCloud backups etc. in theory that should block the iCloud backup route.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago

Here's my foolproof method of not having any issue with the FBI: Don't do illegal stuff.

[-] wowbagger@lemm.ee 29 points 2 years ago

You'd be surprised at how many things you do today that has been illegal or will be illegal in the future. The last part is the real scary one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] flora_explora@beehaw.org 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is such a bad take lacking any solidarity with people that have no choice in doing illegal stuff or who are trying their best to make the world a better place. What is legal or illegal is solely defined by governments. In the context of the US, it is now illegal in some parts to have an abortion, to be transgender, to be an immigrant, to be black, etc. So "don't do illegal stuff" is a reminder of your privileged position to be able to lean back and have nothing to fear, while other people just by existing or by trying to survive automatically are considered illegal. And think of all the whistleblowers like Edward Snowden. We as peole are much better off because of them, yet they have to fear the state's repressions.

Your response makes me really angry just by how inconsiderate and insulting it is :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 21 points 2 years ago

While Don't break the law, asshole is solid advice for staying off the FBI's radar, it's not really a guarantee.

[-] DekkerNSFW@lemmy.fmhy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

And sometimes, justice requires breaking the law. Remember that the Holocaust was legal and Stonewall was not.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TeaEarlGrayHot@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago

"If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear!" 😉

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 16 points 2 years ago

Tell that to Fred Hampton.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] fsniper@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Telegram seem to provide the least info, not signal.

[-] LollerCorleone@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

But Telegram also have access to more info about its users, considering that messages are not end to end encrypted by default, than Signal does of its. This means that Telegram can share any data it wants, its users are just hoping that it won't. In the case of Signal, they don't have access to any meaningful data in the first place. Also leaving these here:
https://www.wired.com/story/the-kremlin-has-entered-the-chat/
https://tech.hindustantimes.com/tech/news/russian-court-directs-telegram-to-share-encryption-keys-to-access-users-messaging-data-story-1ZhjHvyTQJ89RhhNnp4bGL.html

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] tram1@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago

Telegram states at their site that: "To this day, we have disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments."

But according to Spiegel this is false. I don't know German, I read the article using google translate, correct me if I'm wrong.

Here is a quote from the article: "Contrary to what has been publicly stated so far, the operators of the messenger app Telegram have released user data to the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) in several cases."

If this is true, the fact that they are lying is very worrying...

load more comments (5 replies)

This is very useful information. People should be free to discuss ideas without the FBI glaring over their shoulder.

[-] hellequin67@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Whilst enlightening, it's kinda also useless. Let's be honest the majority of endusers use a particular app, in the main, because its most likely what everyone else in their friend group uses.

In my case WhatsApp, I'd struggle to get all my friends and family to change at this point.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
663 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37801 readers
204 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS