230

That doesn’t mean raising the minimum wage had no negative consequences. Reich and his co-author, Denis Sosinsky, found that the higher minimum wage caused menu prices in California fast-food chains to rise by about 3.7 percent. That number is far lower than the “$20 Big Macs” that critics of the law warned of, but it’s still significant at a time when many consumers are deeply upset over the post-pandemic spike in food prices. Even so, Reich points out that this number pales in comparison with the 18 percent raise that the average fast-food worker received because of the new law. (The authors calculated that about 62 percent of the wage increase was absorbed through higher prices, while the rest was likely absorbed by a mix of reduced turnover and, crucially, lower profits for franchisees—hence the massive industry resistance.)

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 77 points 3 days ago

It’s been declared a failure because the corporate overlords say so.

[-] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago

Yeah, the three percent rise likely would have happened either way. The prices are what the economy will tolerate not the cost of business. If the cost of business exceeds the price the economy will tolerate the business folds. This should make the businesses that are left over more efficient. The most efficient countries (highest GDP) tend to have higher wages.

[-] JBar2@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Another perspective is that a 3% increase in prices - even without non-labor inflation - to pay people closer to a living wage reflects a more accurate cost of that dining experience. It could be that the public is subsidizing those restaurants' labor through social programs that make up the difference vs a living wage

As you noted, with the real (or at least more realistic) cost of eating out reflected in the pricing, consumers will decide if that experience is worth it. And some businesses may close. And that's called capitalism

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People complaining about fast food prices come across as entitled to me. How are you going to complain about underpaid staff making you a meal as quickly as possible when it’s not even healthy or good for the environment?

I just don’t understand why this is a metric we measure things by. Are we that lazy that we can’t be bothered to make do without a burger sometimes?

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Are we that lazy that we can’t be bothered to make do without a burger sometimes?

Yes. 3/4 of America is fat to super fat.

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

From a purely consumer perspective, fast food prices increased to the price territory of superior fast casual and independent restaurants while being significantly lower quality.

How did this happen without the other options increasing prices at the same rate? McDonalds lost their value proposition and eaters adjusted.

People didn’t stop ordering burgers, but they can get a great one over McD’s for maybe 20% more cost.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's a good thing, though. They make shit food, pay people shit, charge nothing and do it fast. This is not really a business we need around. The only thing that benefits from McDonald's is people scratching their impatience.

I say let them learn to be a real restaurant that makes, you know, food, or fuck off. Keep cranking those wages up.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

Apparently for some people in food deserts, it's their only viable option. Fast food prices going up means cost of living increased.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

It obviously doesn't affect you, why are you bothering to care?

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Exactly, just don't eat there.

then McDonalds goes under and nobody has a job!

...but.

How are we winning, people?

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Apparently for some people in food deserts, it's their only viable option. Fast food prices going up means cost of living increased.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 37 points 3 days ago

Yup. Overwhelming success for the economy as it always is whenever you raise the minimum wage.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, there's probably some level that's too high, but $16 to $20 per hour is pretty clearly a long ways from it still.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
230 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1683 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS