144
submitted 14 hours ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago

It's almost as if, hear me out here, the Norwegians are right....

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago

Considering how damn low their recidivism rates are, that's a hell yes

Unlike incarcerated residents with jobs in the kitchen or woodshop who earn just a few hundred dollars a month, remote workers make fair-market wages, allowing them to pay victim restitution fees and legal costs, provide child support, and contribute to Social Security and other retirement funds.

Interesting if that's really true, given how prison labor being slavery is pretty much how it works otherwise.

I'd love to know how fair-market the wages are, becuase I somehow suspect that:

  1. They're way lower than someone not in prison would get paid and
  2. The benefits don't exist (no PTO, no insurance, no 401k, etc.) and
  3. The coercive incentives of being able to report your employee to their guards would drive all sorts of abuses

This reads to me as a feel-good whitewashing piece so fragile white liberals can point to it and go 'See? Prison labor isn't that bad!', but perhaps I'm wrong.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You might want to read the whole article. It provides a lot of supporting evidence including names of inmates and how much money they're making per hour. No, they're not getting all of it. 10% of their pay is taken for "housing" them at the jail,which is BS, but whatever, that's small potatoes compared to having nothing at all.

From the end of the article:

Scott never thought much of herself, she said, and after being sentenced to 11 years in prison, she felt she would forever be labeled a “criminal.” But then she enrolled in college, got involved in MIT’s Educational Justice Institute, and in the spring of last year, landed a fellowship making $25 an hour as a project manager for the Alliance for Higher Education in Prison, where she helped develop a guide to remote work.

Being part of professional networks that valued her contributions has helped her redefine her place in the world, Scott said, and “see a better version of myself.”

In all, Scott has managed to save nearly $30,000. She applied for supervised community confinement and was able to rent an apartment after her father persuaded the landlord to drop the “no felonies” clause by showing him her résumé and bank statements.

Scott could be released soon. She has a place to live and another possible job on the horizon.

So this particular inmate, who is still incarcerated, is making $25 an hour and has been able to save $30,000 and potentially has an apartment lined up. There's other examples and evidence in the article, but I suggest you read the whole thing.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Well, you've got great points.

And, here in the US, they're points that require extra scrutiny of any such situation.

That being said, Norway has done this kind of thing with incredible success, and not just remote work either. So the idea itself is most definitely one that merits a real attempt here too

[-] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Maybe somebody should make the argument that random businesses benefiting from prison labor is not only unethical for the prisoner, but also for the people that they owe restitution to.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

fragile white liberals can point to it and go 'See? Prison labor isn't that bad!'

I just don't see any liberal type (I'm assuming you mean progressives -- just basically the opposite of trumpets) saying American prison labour is good. But they may say that if decent and meaningful labour at union-like wages has been shown to be beneficial for decreasing recidivism, then let's trust the science and get some oversight and assessment going to confirm or refute it.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Unlike incarcerated residents with jobs in the kitchen or woodshop who earn just a few hundred dollars a month, remote workers make fair-market wages, allowing them to pay victim restitution fees and legal costs, provide child support, and contribute to Social Security and other retirement funds. Like inmates in work-release programs who have jobs out in the community, 10 percent of remote workers’ wages go to the state to offset the cost of room and board. All Maine DOC residents get re-entry support for housing and job searches before they’re released, and remote workers leave with even more: up-to-date résumés, a nest egg — and the hope that they’re less likely to need food or housing assistance, or resort to crime to get by.

I went into this article skeptical. Allowing them to be paid fairly shouldn't be a big deal but it absolutely is. Getting inmates a nest-egg to go back to the world with is huge, because most inmates walk out with almost nothing, which often leads to chronic homelessness and ending up back in jail. This is huge. I'm glad to see it at least somewhere.

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

Having to pay only 10% of your income for room and board, sounds so good, people would kill for it.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 13 hours ago

because most inmates walk out with almost nothing, which often leads to chronic homelessness and ending up back in jail.

There is a reason the "former" slaves states like Alabama ensure that prisoners are destitute when they are released.

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 24 points 13 hours ago

Allowing them to be paid fairly shouldn't be a big deal but it absolutely is.

Not many people realize it but slavery is still legal in the US. Convicted inmates can be forced to work as part of their punishment.

[-] stinky@redlemmy.com 1 points 10 hours ago

I want every prison in my country emptied today, police abolished and for this humanitarian crisis to never happen again, no matter the cost.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 15 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Moral hazard, getting money/profit from prison labor creates a incentive to have more laborers contributing their tithe. Or find creative ways to keep high value laborers for longer.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago

We never made slavery illegal in the U.S. That's why we make various things a crime, send people to prison, and then bam, free labor for pennies on the dollar, and sometimes nothing. And the BEST PART, they aren't subject to labor laws, so they can treat them subhuman, and create working conditions that would make you want to puke. Yay capitalism, where everyone is just a number.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

free labor for pennies on the dollar, and sometimes nothing

🤔

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Maybe i should have called it forced labor. They don't exactly have a choice.

this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
144 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

60090 readers
2694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS