When I tell people one of the reasons we're taking advantage of my dual nationality and emigrating is that my wife is a librarian, they think it's a joke.
It's not a fucking joke.
I will put money on SCOTUS reversing this and making it legal to arrest librarians for corrupting the youth.
Somer states give librarians the authority to issue arrest warrants if the value of overdue books is over a certain amount. Just saying.
So you're saying this is just fair play? Really?
FYI: My wife's library doesn't even have overdue fines. We're in Indiana where she can already be arrested for allowing minors to access certain information deemed unsuitable.
So its ok when there in porn in a google advert?
This is something they love to do. Pass a law they know is unconstitutional and then use the power of the state to fight for it. The Left has to waste money they could be spending on political campaigns while the taxpayers foot the legal expenses. And they get to crow about 'activist' judges undermining the will of the people.
It's worse than that. Their goal is to throw the legal equivalent to spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks. Sometimes they get lucky and then you have a brick to add to historical precedence.
Hell, the age verification porn law is seen as unconstitutional but it's held on.
Actually getting the law in place is gravy.
Look at overturning Roe V. Wade. That energized a lot of Dems.
Any reason the Dems are not doing the same?
Different mind sets. The Dems want government to work. They saw the New Deal raise millions out of poverty and want to bring it back. The GOP saw the New Deal bring millions out of poverty and it made them want to destroy government.
My completely unqualified answer would be a combination of two things.
The first is that it's often a lot easier to "say no" and be destructive/restrictive than it is to be constructive, thoughtful, intentional, and inclusive. The second is that the system of checks are out of balance and skewed towards Republicans even if the demographics of the US population as a whole don't reflect that.
The second is that Republicans control more of government at a state and local level in addition to having a majority in the highest branch of the judiciary. Therefore they not only have the ability to pump out more laws, they also have a higher probability of one of those bat shit laws being upheld.
I can provide a bit more of a qualified answer, backed up by my own observations and my research into running for office as well as my research in elections. It became an obsession after the 2020 election. With that in mind, take this with a grain of salt.
The TL;DR of the below: Democrats fall in love and Republicans Fall in Line
Broadly speaking, the people who consistently vote for Republicans and the people who vote for Democrats (i.e. their respective base) are very different. The Republican base favors control and order whereas the Democrat base favors cooperation and liberty.
Because of this, Republican politicians can get away with shit laws that are oppressive, that restrict rights, and basically allow people to be shitty to people who are different (read: white, cis, hetro people can be assholes to non-white, trans, non-hetro people). Even the most moderate Republican voter who is open-minded will still vote Republican because being "nice" is not a higher value than "order". So even though Marjorie Taylor Greene or Donald Fucking Trump are complete assholes, because they write laws that protect them, they don't have enough motivation to not vote for a Republican.
Contrast this with the Democratic base. For a moment, assume that Donald Trump, is just as disgusting, just as racist, just as misogynistic, but consistently voted progressively. You (assuming you are on the liberal side of the spectrum) would probably either not vote for him or actively vote against him. The Democrat base is also very large in that there are a lot of pockets of people who tend to vote Democrat, but only if you speak to their specific issue.
That's why Democratic candidates often have to run a very tight, very structured, and near perfect campaign whereas Republicans can literally take a candidate who's never been to a donut shop and have a gaff of him ordering a box of "whatever makes sense".
While Republicans have a consistent base that votes, Democrats do not. Democrats have to win the "middle", i.e. people who aren't politically engaged and these people often fall into three categories:
There is a common denominator of these people: they are often privileged and have never been on the sharp end of a government action and don't think it will happen to them. So campaigns have to spend time to try to convince them that it's worth voting for them.
So, to answer your question as to why Democrats can't just give zero fucks: they literally can't do that and win elections. Democrats can't keep their base if they do.
Also, the Left needs to convince diverse groups to work together. All the Right has to do is come up with a phrase like "Make America Great Again" and it can pull in lots of people. That's why Trump stole the phrase from Reagan.
Up the ladder it goes, then. Unfortunately, the ladder ends in a fascist-majority Supreme Court.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.