47

Hey! I am building Microservices framework with focus on simplicity and potentially targeted to dev environments, it's in veeeeeeery alfa stage, so only WIKI exists reflecting current design and use cases. However I'd like to get some feedback to see if see the whole thing make a sense. Thanks

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

How would explain what this is for to someone who doesn't know what this works as an alternative to?

[-] melezhik@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ok. Huge part of building microservices framework is infrastructure automation - like setup nginx load balancing in runtime, build and deploy apps from source code, configuring services, tcp ports, health checks, horizontal scaling (adding new worker nodes), setup logging and monitoring, etc, also this needs to be propagated to all cluster nodes, I am not going to do this from the scratch - Sparky is alike (rough comparison though) ansible but with UI and programmable on Raku, so as Sparky has already addressed the mentioned tasks, it's logical for me to carry on with it. If we take Sparky out of equation, Raku by itself is reach and super flexible language to automate infrastructure, I don't see why can't I use it for that ...

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Why did you decide to go with Rakulang?

[-] melezhik@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

The plan is to build the entire system on top of Sparky which is written on Raku and extended by Raku

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
47 points (98.0% liked)

Open Source

31759 readers
277 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS