173
submitted 21 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Donald Trump’s second inaugural fund is set to exceed $150 million, breaking the $107 million record from 2017.

Major companies like Amazon, Meta, Toyota, and Ford, along with executives like Sam Altman and Ken Griffin, are donating $1 million each.

Experts note the contributions aim to curry favor or avoid backlash from the incoming administration.

Some firms, despite earlier pledges to suspend political donations after the January 6 Capitol riot, are now participating.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 42 points 16 hours ago

Add this to the pile of reasons no one is outraged by a CEO being gunned down. We're tired of this bullshit and they're happy to buy power right in front of our eyes.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 45 points 17 hours ago

donations is a weird way to spell bribes.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago

Too small for bribes from these billionaires. It's a set token, a show of loyalty (at the last moment?) that they'd support him. I don't know how long this loyalty would last, but I'm sure that's the sum he asked from those who wanted to be close to him as a prove.

[-] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Kissing the ring

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 8 points 12 hours ago

What is that money used for? I dont get it.

Giving money for a campaign makes sense. Its expensive. Covers expenses of your campaign workers, travel, advertisement, etc.

But after you've won, your cabinet is paid by tax dollars. What the heck is an inauguration donation for??

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

It goes into Trump’s pocket.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 hours ago

Bribes for "please don't regulate us" "look the other way"

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

It's just so brazen at this point.

[-] thisnameisnottolong@aussie.zone 57 points 20 hours ago

Where I come from we call it bribery. And it's super illegal.

[-] 4grams@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago

we made it legal a while ago, just used to pretend it was a bad thing. This one uses it as their strategy.

hope this country enjoys the dictatorship of dunces we just voted in.

[-] narr1@lemmy.ml 44 points 19 hours ago

How many meals can this buy for those wanting? Shelters for the homeless? Treatment for the sick? Oh wait, I forgot. The US is a third world country with a Gucci belt. The fascists do what the fascists do.

[-] WeeSheep@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago

A third world country with a Gucci belt. I've never heard that before and I love it.

[-] narr1@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago

You are very welcome to use it, my friend. I think it's very apt, but I can't remember where I read it for the first time though.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago

And it's probably not even real Gucci

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 30 points 19 hours ago

Last time he tried to hide it. This time he is being completely open about the fact that he is for sale because he believes that he is untouchable.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

He is. Pandoras box is now open. God Emperor Trump has 4 years to lay the groundwork to never leave and have his family rule absolute.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

He is, until he isn't.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 15 hours ago

because he believes that he is untouchable.

And why wouldn't he?

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Uh duh? I mean did anyone expect these assholes to not suck on his toadstool once he was elected?

I guess it's expensive to hire people to show up.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Sadly presidents having corporations donate large sums of money to their inaugurations is not new, although Trump is definitely getting more.

U.S. President Joe Biden raised $61.8 million for his inauguration events, receiving large contributions from corporations, labor unions and wealthy individuals, according to a financial disclosure.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pfizer-unions-others-donated-618-mln-bidens-inaugural-2021-04-21/

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 19 hours ago

"Business leaders" my ass! They're oligarchs who will be first against the wall come the revolution!

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 6 points 20 hours ago

Repugnance abound

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

The business leaders themselves are calling this the Big Orange Cock Suck.

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
173 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2249 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS