286
submitted 2 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Donald Trump criticized President Biden’s decision to commute the sentences of 37 federal death row inmates, calling them “violent criminals” and wishing them to go to hell.

Trump also took the opportunity to sarcastically wish a “Merry Christmas” to Chinese troops in the Panama Canal and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Trump’s post also included references to his previous attempts to purchase Greenland and his suggestion that Wayne Gretzky run for Canadian Prime Minister.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 16 hours ago

Would you be for a death penalty in cases where you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the person that is accused is the perpetrator? And by shadow of a doubt, I am not referring to the very loose standards that most law enforcement relies on. I mean that the person was caught in the act.

[-] Vraylle@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 16 hours ago

In my case, no...for two reasons.

First, you can never be 100% sure you have the right person (especially given a lengthy history of police falsifying evidence, etc., and there can always be other factors involved). If you incorrectly put someone in jail you can attempt to make amends later, but how do you make amends to a person you murdered?

Second, given how human beings have evolved and how their brains function, life in solitary would be a far worse punishment if the goal is to punish or make them suffer for their crime. If your goal isn't punishment or reform, but instead simple revenge, then I suppose this argument wouldn't carry much weight for you.

[-] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I feel you are misunderstanding me. I am not asking about hypotheticals where the police lie. I am saying that in a hypothetical where YOU can prove beyond the shadow of a doubt.

It's not about rehabilitation or punishment. It's about logistics. If there is a dog that repeatedly attacks other people, children and dogs and rehabilitation has failed. The only recourse would be to terminate that dog as it is unsafe for society for the dog to be allowed out. Sure, you could build a secure containment facility to house your inmate dog but at what cost. At that point you are then taking resources that could be better spent to help people in need to contain a problem that will not be solved. I am actually in agreement with you that it's a far crueler punishment to keep somebody alive in a non autonomous position that they would hate.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

He's got some real skill at expressing inarticulate, impotent rage.

And if there were a Hell, Trump would be headed for the least pleasant precinct in it.

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He's already there, and we're living in it with him. This is the bad place.

[-] Stitch0815@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah but I actually think he is one of the Demon actors

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure his hell would be serving in a soup kitchen for thousands of years. Volunteering.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 1 day ago

Trump is sad that he only gets execute one of the remaining three. The other two (Dylan Roof and Robert Bowers) are destined for bigger things in the Trump cabinet.

[-] Naich@lemmings.world 108 points 2 days ago

Why do we have to hang on every word this fucking arsehole says? He's an utter cretin.

[-] archonet@lemy.lol 18 points 2 days ago

Four years.

Four goddamn years I had to wake up every day and pay attention to what asinine shit the President of the United States tweeted.

Because, unfortunately, that utter cretin had the nuclear button.

And now we have to endure another four years of the same.

Shit, for all the bad things you can say about Biden, you can at least say that whenever you heard a story start with "Today, the president said..." in the news, you weren't immediately going "ah fuck here we go". Four years I dealt with that kind of reflexive dread.

God, I wish I could just slip into a coma until 2029.

Honestly, if we get out of this one without some sort of nuclear exchange, I’m going to be mildly shocked. Remember: this is the guy who had to be talked down from nuking a fucking hurricane, and apparently it took a while to convince him it wasn’t the sharpest idea.

[-] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 57 points 2 days ago

Well the media invested a lot of time and effort to get him elected and now they want to cash in on all that hard work.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Personally I'd like to keep up with the Canada comments considering he's threatening to annex our fucking country. Americans, fix your country

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He sure does talk a lot of shit about death penalty for someone who allegedly committed high treason, punishable by death.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 2 days ago
[-] Pechente@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago

Not to mention that no other OECD country except for Japan still has it.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Before I clicked this link, I already had visions of that kid with tears in his eyes as they put him in the electric chair... and hoped that it wasn't the same one.

I'm surprised to learn he's 14, he looks 9!

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have two reasons why I'm against it.

  1. Innocent people will get sentenced. There's no way around that. Sententing an innocent person to death is among the greatest injustices I can think of so I'll rather have someone guilty walk free. Granted that sentencing an innocent person to life in prison aint that much better but this is where the second reason comes in.

  2. I don't believe in free will. Punishing someone for something they did is not compatible with the way I see the word*. It's like punishing a grizzly bear for attacking a person. If you're danger to society you should be locked up one way or another but not as a punishment but to keep others safe. I think that even if you're a murderer you should be treated well and we should figure out a way for them to live relatively normal lives behind the bars. They can't help themselves. They didn't choose to be born that way and thus shouldn't be punished as if they could have acted otherwise.

* Risk of consequences still works as a deterrence and that "punishment" be it fine or jail time should still be carried out because otherwise it loses its credibility.

[-] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

In extreme cases sure, tho I feel the need to point out the context of the vats majority of criminals being conditioned into crime by their surrounding. Poverty and discrimination come to mind among others. I my opinion the best way to prevent anything is to hit it at its source, in this case making every day life more livable. Not only does that mean life must be comfortably affordable, but mental health should also be a top priority.

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

I don't disagree with any of that nor do I feel like it goes against anything I just said.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Doesn't point 2 kind of justify execution too? We're not chosing to execute that action it was pre-determined that we would execute that person from the moment the universe began.

[-] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Just because it happened doesn't mean it wasn't a mistake that we can learn from. In that regard, it was not justified.

Now if you are talking about taking the same action in a parallel universe, then that definitely depends on the perspective you're modelling.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

I feel like you're considering death penalty to be the default, but if the same logic is applied while considering lifetime in prison as the default, the result would be the opposite.

And considering that death of age looks to me more natural, I'm inclined to think no death penalty should be the default

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago

but he was the first "president" to march in the "pro life" rally 🙄

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 37 points 2 days ago

Reminder that about 1 in 25 people on death row are estimated to be innocent.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Reminder trumps been found very very guilty.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago

He should do that himself, he would be right at home.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago

We don't want him

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

Old man yells at clouds

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

In the great Christmas spirit.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago

Actually he said "Governor" Trudeau

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 days ago

were just given, incredibly, a pardon by Sleepy Joe Biden

dumfuk lying again. on purpose. trying to get the cult riled-up over 'pardons' that didn't happen.

a commuted sentence is not a pardon.

these 37 men are still guilty. they are still in jail.. for life.. without parole. they will remain there and never be released.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The best part is nobody fucken knows what that means and they just believe these dudes are instantly set upon the streets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 24 points 2 days ago

Who the fuck cares what this guy writes on Christmas. Dude just says the same ignorant shit over and over to rile up his supporters.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A tyrant's rage

A nation divide

Like toddlers tears

When rattles denied

"That was my thing!"

Now broken plans

As he wipes a tear

with little hands

Biden stole

His hateful thunder

Who's next in sight?

I mustn't wonder.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

"You first."

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He’s so damn embarrassing. What the heck did I just read

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
286 points (93.9% liked)

News

23669 readers
3313 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS