506
submitted 4 days ago by eran_morad@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

archive link

The country’s prime minister said the incident, the latest in a series of disruptions to undersea infrastructure, underscored the danger of a so-called Russian shadow fleet.

At least Finland is fighting for the good of humanity.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 155 points 4 days ago

The West must fucking find its balls and acknowledge that we are in a hybrid war against the blyats. It is high fucking time we fight back. Using every means short of direct military conflict.

[-] Bezier@suppo.fi 82 points 4 days ago

Unlike the previous ships, this one was immediately seized by armed forces, so I guess we're starting to wake up.

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 11 points 3 days ago

To my knowledge, it was escorted to Finland from international waters by the coast guard, after which the police quick-response task unit stormed the bridge via helicopter. Had the ship refused to leave international waters, there’s nothing they could have done. I applaud them for their boldness and aggression, but luck also played a role. As far as I’m aware, the previous ships never entered any country’s territorial waters.

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

The previous ships weren't seen with hard evidence. This one had a missing anchor.

Apparently there are also some actions available on international waters where also countering pirates lies

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

Short of? Eastern Europe is being invaded and Europe is standing by...

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Rbf, I think they're waiting for the real* Europe to be invaded.

  • subject to change.
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Why should we stop short?
Russia is actively in combat with an Eastern European nation and has been for 4 years. It's arguable that the rest of Europe and the West engaging with Russia on a battlefield would actually save more lives in the end by shortening the conflict.
They can't make war if you remove their means to make war.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Because it's far more effective to wage an asymmetric non-shooting war. We have far more resources than the blyats could muster. We could outcompete them 100-fold in every fucking dimension. we could gradually weaken them until their miserable state crumbles. All without the devastation of war.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I studier the west is fully aware of that, and is fighting it on multiple fonts

[-] bitwise@lemmy.ca 135 points 4 days ago

We need to stop pretending that nuclear armament is an excuse to trample other countries with this childish crap.

Cut their internet and declare their currency holdings forfeit. Ban all travel to Russia. Force all companies to divest their holdings in Russia. Eject them from the UN.

Force them to live alone and if China joins in, then start ramping up production and give 'em the same treatment.

[-] Shawdow194@fedia.io 40 points 4 days ago

Keeping it tense between them and China is so good, alone theyll never make it. Watching Putin the panty poisoner and Xi Pooh bear give each other crusty blowjobs and get nothing from it is top 👌

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

If Europe and the US refused to trade with anyone who trades with Russia, China would embargo Russia in about half a second.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago

China knows we can’t stop importing all the garbage they send us. They have the markets cornered in so many items and materials that we really can’t embargo them.

[-] Zementid@feddit.nl 11 points 3 days ago

We could, but we prefer comfort, so we don't. That seems to sum up where society is today.

Climate change? People who leave their car running while shopping so it stays cool don’t care about genocide or war as long as it’s far away. And honestly, I can’t entirely blame them—I probably grew up ignorant about some issues too.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

We can’t afford to furnish our houses without china. And our US big businesses know it. It’s how they were able to keep wages so stagnant for so long, they were leaning on cheap Chinese TVs and plastics.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yes we prefer checks notes having batteries

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

It's kinda interesting when you think about it. If the US politics had actually been pro worker/union for the past 60 years, we would've had protections and increased production/economical stability in the country by just giving it's own citizens power. Instead they've given china the power of production and influence while creating a hostile environment for competition and success state side.

I dance between some people being so ignorant they have no clue what they're doing and some are just hired CEO politicians selling the country off as much as they can squeeze before it goes under and they scurry away with their nest eggs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 122 points 4 days ago

You allow Russia to invade one country, you invite Russia to invade the next country.

You allow Russia to shoot down one passenger plane, you invite Russia to shoot down the next passenger plane.

You allow Russia to cut one undersea cable, you invite Russia to cut more undersea cables.

[-] bitwise@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago

Appeasement just means more lebensraum.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 65 points 3 days ago

Russian bingo card

  • Cut under sea cables
  • Shoot down passenger airplanes
  • Poison people in horrible ways on other countries
  • Having a large part of the population being unable to pass windows without falling out
  • Invade countries (and thereby violating the treaty you signed saying you would not, making you as trustworthy as a Ferengi)
  • Commit genocide
  • I'm sure im missing more but i already got Bingo, yay!
[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

Buy off incoming dementia riddled president.

[-] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

They bought off musk? I thought he was already a POS

[-] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Musk is ketamine-addled, his puppet is dementia-riddled.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think Russia would gladly not buy Putin

[-] yeh74fjic8e5we@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago
  • Deny / Discredit / Deflect Although those aren't uniquely Russian
[-] Erasmus@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago

Just start ‘accidentally’ sinking the fucking ships that ‘accidentally’ cut the cables and that will get the message across.

[-] mycelium_underground@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

That assumes Russia gives a shit about it's people.

Tap for spoilerRussia does not give a shit.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago

Best use of spoiler ever...

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 12 points 3 days ago

Let's not sink a tanker full of gasoline into an already polluted baltic sea.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

Then just do what Egypt did to some ships, seize them for an investigation and do it over 40 years while the crew is detained.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

We need to go a lot further than this, but yes.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 14 points 3 days ago

Thank God for Finland.

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

I'm just waiting for the moment when a country exposed to "accidental" cable cutting, or attacks using water jets from the Chinese coast guard or similar, just responds by shooting first and asking questions later.

Like: You cut our cables/blocked our atoll from getting resupply, etc... put a 50mm in their face and carry on. Let them do the responding.

"Oh no, they were conducting acts of war and were in our way, so we sank them. What are you gonna do about it? Maybe stop doing that?"

[-] magikmw@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

Oh but they crave escalation. Like any bully, they want the victim to respond violently, because that would justify their actions and let them respond in kind, saying they are just protecting their security.

Even those ship arrests are fodder for their internal propaganda - "They just started arresting innocent Chinese ships with russian crews! Barbarians AND Facists!"

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Trust me, bullies back down after escalation. Ever punch a bully in the lip?

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Do you think that they're not trying to provoke a reaction?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] knacht1@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago
[-] perestroika@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Don't be silly. The thing is full of perfectly good oil (that would contaminate everything of you sank it), but which can pay for part of cable repairs, once nobody pays up from the Cook Islands or the "owner" company.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
506 points (99.2% liked)

News

23684 readers
3966 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS